Control of Multicellular Development by the Physically Interacting Deneddylases DEN1/DenA and COP9 Signalosome
Deneddylases remove the ubiquitin-like protein Nedd8 from modified proteins. An increased deneddylase activity has been associated with various human cancers. In contrast, we show here that a mutant strain of the model fungus Aspergillus nidulans deficient in two deneddylases is viable but can only grow as a filament and is highly impaired for multicellular development. The DEN1/DenA and the COP9 signalosome (CSN) deneddylases physically interact in A. nidulans as well as in human cells, and CSN targets DEN1/DenA for protein degradation. Fungal development responds to light and requires both deneddylases for an appropriate light reaction. In contrast to CSN, which is necessary for sexual development, DEN1/DenA is required for asexual development. The CSN-DEN1/DenA interaction that affects DEN1/DenA protein levels presumably balances cellular deneddylase activity. A deneddylase disequilibrium impairs multicellular development and suggests that control of deneddylase activity is important for multicellular development.
Published in the journal:
. PLoS Genet 9(2): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003275
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003275
Summary
Deneddylases remove the ubiquitin-like protein Nedd8 from modified proteins. An increased deneddylase activity has been associated with various human cancers. In contrast, we show here that a mutant strain of the model fungus Aspergillus nidulans deficient in two deneddylases is viable but can only grow as a filament and is highly impaired for multicellular development. The DEN1/DenA and the COP9 signalosome (CSN) deneddylases physically interact in A. nidulans as well as in human cells, and CSN targets DEN1/DenA for protein degradation. Fungal development responds to light and requires both deneddylases for an appropriate light reaction. In contrast to CSN, which is necessary for sexual development, DEN1/DenA is required for asexual development. The CSN-DEN1/DenA interaction that affects DEN1/DenA protein levels presumably balances cellular deneddylase activity. A deneddylase disequilibrium impairs multicellular development and suggests that control of deneddylase activity is important for multicellular development.
Introduction
Conjugation and deconjugation of target proteins with ubiquitin (Ub) and related proteins is an important posttranslational regulatory principle to control the stability, activity or location of modified substrates. The neuronal precursor cell expressed developmentally down-regulated gene 8 (Nedd8) is a member of the ubiquitin family and represents the closest relative of ubiquitin (Ub) within the group of ubiquitin-like (Ubl) proteins [1]. Covalent attachment of Ubls as Nedd8 requires processing of a precursor peptide resulting in a free di-glycine motif at the C-terminus. All Ubls require in addition an ATP dependent activation cascade of an activating E1, a conjugating E2 enzyme and a substrate specific E3 ligase. Covalent attachment of Nedd8 is termed neddylation, whereas deneddylation is the reverse deconjugation reaction [2]. The major neddylation targets are the cullins which are scaffold proteins within the Cullin-RING ligases (CRL) which serve as ubiquitin ligases. Mammals have seven different cullins (CUL1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 5 and 7) [3] while orthologs of three of them (CulA, C and D) are conserved in Aspergillus nidulans [4]. Studies in mammalian cells showed that the Ub E3 CRL-RING component Rbx1 interacts with the Nedd8 E2 enzyme Ubc12 and acts as a Nedd8 E3 ligase for cullins [5]. Nedd8 induces a conformational change that allows the first Ub to bridge a gap between the Ub-E2 and the substrate to be ubiquitinated [6]. The CUL1 containing CRLs have more than 350 substrates which include a number of factors involved in human tumor formation [7].
Deneddylation of cullins inactivates CRLs and allows the disassembly of the enzyme complex and the binding of CAND1 (Cullin associated Nedd8 dissociated protein 1) [8], [9]. CAND1 is important for the reassembly of E3 complexes [10]. Thus, deneddylation of cullins has two functions: it blocks ubiquitination and prepares rearrangement of Ub E3 CRLs. The most prominent deneddylases in humans are the CSN (COP9 signalosome) complex and DEN1 (deneddylase 1) [11], [12]. In addition, there are Ub-specific proteases with dual specificity for Ub and Nedd8 such as USP21 and UCH-L3 (Ub-C-terminal hydrolase) [13].
The mammalian CSN consists of eight subunits (CSN1–CSN8) which are conserved in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans [14], [15]. CSN possesses the deneddylase activity as an intrinsic metalloprotease with a JAMM motif localized on CSN5 [16]. CSN forms functional super complexes with CRLs and removes Nedd8 from cullins via its metalloprotease [17]–[19]. CSN is more than a deneddylase, since it is associated with kinases [20] and the de-ubiquitinating protein USP15 [21]. In addition, it acts as an assembly platform for Ub E3 CRLs [19], [22]–[24]. In various organisms the CSN is also a key regulator for light dependent cellular processes [25]–[27]. Reduced CSN function results in embryonic lethality in plants [28], insects [29] or mammals [15], and an early block of sexual development in A. nidulans [14], [25] (Figure 1A). CSN up-regulation in various cancers suggests a function in human tumor formation [15], [30].
The mammalian DEN1 cysteine protease was initially classified as a SUMO specific protease [31]. Its high preference for Nedd8 is determined by a number of key residues responsible for the architecture of the enzyme [32]. Human DEN1 is a bifunctional enzyme which can process the C-terminus of Nedd8 producing the free di-glycine motif and deconjugates Nedd8 from cullins [33]. The developmental function of DEN1 is unclear. The two DEN1 homologs in the fission yeast S. pombe, NEP1 and NEP2 can deneddylate cullins in vitro, but no in vivo function is known [34]. Drosophila DEN1 deneddylates numerous non-cullin proteins which were highly neddylated in corresponding DEN1 mutants [35]. For example, DEN1 targets the regulator MDM2 for degradation by deneddylation, whereas MDM2 is stabilized by neddylation [36]. The Drosophila DEN1 mutation suppresses Nedd8 mutant lethality [35]. Mammalian DEN1 has been shown to be involved in the regulation of apoptosis. Activated caspases can be neddylated by inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs) leading to a block of caspase activity. DEN1 reactivates caspases by deneddylation [37].
In this study we describe the first developmental phenotypes of a denA/DEN1 deletion using the multicellular fungus A. nidulans. DenA/DEN1 and CSN are required for development and physically interact. CSN targets DEN1/DenA for protein degradation and this mechanism is conserved in A. nidulans and human cells.
Results
The fungal DEN1 homolog DenA is required for light-dependent development
Mutant strains defective in the DEN1 deneddylase displaying clear phenotypes have not yet been described. Aspergillus nidulans represents a multicellular eukaryotic model which grows as a filament, starting from a fungal spore (Figure 1A). After approximately 20 hours of growth this mold is able to respond to external signals to establish an asexual or a sexual developmental pathway for another round of spore formation [38]. Asexual development is promoted by light and results in mitotic spores (conidia) which are released into the air. The sexual pathway is inhibited by light and results in the formation of meiotic spores within closed complex fruiting bodies (cleistothecia) [25], [39]. Defects in the A. nidulans COP9 signalosome deneddylase result in mutant strains which are unresponsive to light and blocked in sexual development [14], [25]. This defect was compared to the deletion phenotype of the second deneddylase encoded by the DEN1 homolog denA (AN10456) of A. nidulans.
The respective 258 amino acid protein and the corresponding open reading frame were identified performing a BlastP search with the human DEN1 amino acid sequence (UniProt Acc.-No. Q96LD8) on the A. nidulans genome [40] applying the NCBI Blast tool (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The protein is predicted to be a member of the Ulp1 peptidase family with the characteristic catalytic triad histidine (H), aspartate (D) and cysteine (C). Close homologs were as well found in other Aspergilli. The human DEN1 protein is 32% identical with A. nidulans DenA (Figure S1). Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) [41] revealed a transcript with seven exons interrupted by six introns with a total length of 1469 base pairs (Figure 1B). Northern hybridization experiments were performed to monitor expression of denA during different stages of fungal development. The corresponding mRNA was present throughout all stages of fungal life with elevated levels during asexual and sexual development (Figure 1C). In order to figure out whether DenA protein abundance correlates with gene expression western blot experiments were performed for comparable time points. A. nidulans DenA was fused with GFP at the C-terminus (DenA-GFP) and the construct was introduced to the endogenous denA locus, expressed from the native denA promoter. The corresponding strain was indistinguishable from wild type indicating that the fusion construct can fulfill denA function (data not shown). The GFP tag applied for these experiments was stable towards protein degradation in fungal cells, whereas the DenA protein fused to it was not. We analyzed the quantitative relation between the DenA-GFP fusion and the remaining GFP tag and applied this as a measure for protein stability of DenA-GFP (Figure 1D). DenA-GFP was present during vegetative growth and early stages of development, but was no more detected at later stages of development (Figure 1D). During vegetative growth the fungal cell produced low amounts of stable DenA-GFP. During sexual and asexual development high amounts of unstable DenA were produced. This was represented by the increase of signal intensity for the remaining GFP tag which is a stable remnant from degradation of the DenA fusion protein (Figure 1D, GFP). Altogether the data showed that denA expression and protein abundance were not correlating. Observations made especially during asexual and sexual development suggest that some kind of post-translational stability control might exist. Additionally we performed fluorescence microscopy with the DenA-GFP which revealed several subpopulations of DenA in vegetative germlings of A. nidulans. Those were localized in the nucleus, at either site of the fungal septum within a ball shaped structure or in the cytoplasm (Figure 1E).
In order to explore the role of denA in the fungal cell we generated a knock-out strain. Deletion of the denA coding region resulted in a fungal strain with a significantly reduced growth rate compared to denA wild type (Figure 2A, 2B). Complementation of the ΔdenA strain by denA resulted in a strain indistinguishable from wild type (Figure 2). Asexual development was almost abolished upon denA deletion, even during constant white light, which normally favors wild type asexual development. Formation of asexual sporulation structures (conidiophores) took much longer in the ΔdenA strain and the overall number was marginal. Quantification revealed that spore production corresponds to only 4% of a denA wild type strain (Figure 2C). However, the few conidiophores produced by the denA mutant differentiated in a normal manner.
There was no significant difference between sexual development of wild type or the ΔdenA strain in the dark (Figure 2D, dark columns). However, the ΔdenA strain was unresponsive to light and could not inhibit sexual fruit body formation to 20% as wild type in a light-dependent process [42]. The ΔdenA strain formed similar numbers of cleistothecia with normal size and viable ascospores in light or darkness (Figure 2D, 2E).
Therefore, fungal DenA is important for light-inhibition of sexual development and is required for asexual spore formation (Figure 1A).
DenA deneddylates cullin in vivo and in vitro, whereas processed Nedd8 is insufficient to restore the developmental defect of a denA deletion
Human DEN1 is a dual functional protease in vitro, processing Nedd8 or cleaving the isopeptide bond between Nedd8 and a target protein [31], [33], [43]. Yeast-2-hybrid experiments revealed that A. nidulans DenA interacts with the precursor or the mature form of fungal Nedd8 (Figure 3A). We addressed if processing or deneddylation activity of DenA is responsible for the developmental phenotype. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains deleted for the UCH encoding gene yuh1 cannot produce the processed variant of yeast Nedd8 (Rub1). Such strains show no obvious growth phenotype but in western experiments neddylated cullins cannot be detected with appropriate antibodies (Figure 3, lane 2) [44]. We introduced a plasmid into the corresponding yeast deletion strain expressing A. nidulans denA from an inducible GAL1 promoter. After induction by growth on galactose containing medium we prepared crude extracts and performed western blot experiments to monitor protein neddylation. Neither the yeast cullin Cdc53 appeared in its neddylated form nor did the Rub1/Nedd8 antibody detect any other neddylated protein at the size of a cullin (Figure 3B). Thus, A. nidulans DenA was unable to complement the Nedd8 processing deficient yuh1 mutant of S. cerevisiae. To further discriminate between Nedd8 processing and deneddylation an A. nidulans strain was constructed expressing a mature Nedd8 variant (Nedd8m) that does not require processing. The resulting strain was viable and competent for asexual and sexual development. Therefore processed Nedd8 can fulfill the functions of the original unprocessed Nedd8 (Figure 3C) [4]. When the processed Nedd8 mutant was combined with ΔdenA, it was indistinguishable from the denA deletion phenotype (Figure 3D). Furthermore, in vitro activity tests with recombinant A. nidulans DenA and human DEN1 (Figure 3E and Figure S2) were performed. A linear substrate composed of processed human Nedd8, C-terminally fused with GFP was efficiently cleaved by the human DEN1 protease but the fungal DenA showed no detectable formation of cleavage product under the tested conditions (Figure 3E). These experiments support that the fungal denA deletion phenotype, which impairs A. nidulans development, does not depend on the Nedd8 processing function.
Deneddylation activity of fungal DenA was examined in more detail. GST-DenA purified from E. coli cleaved the isopeptide bond of human CUL1-Nedd8 as efficient as human DEN1 (Figure 4A and Figure S3) demonstrating deneddylase function of the fungal protein. To test DenA deneddylation in vivo we accomplished heterologous expression studies in S. cerevisiae. A yeast strain constitutively expressing A. nidulans culD, the fungal homologue of human CUL4, was additionally transformed with a plasmid containing a galactose inducible construct of A. nidulans denA. Following induction of denA expression by growth on galactose containing medium CulD neddylation was monitored by western experiments (Figure 4B). When DenA was present CulD could not be detected with the Rub1/Nedd8 antibody and also a LexA antibody generated only a signal for the non neddylated form of CulD (Figure 4B, right lanes). Furthermore, whole cell extracts of A. nidulans wild type, ΔcsnE and ΔdenA were probed with a CulA specific antibody to examine the neddylation state of the cullin. Upon denA deletion the portion of neddylated CulA increased compared to the wild type, corroborating DenA function in cullin deneddylation in vivo. Neddylated CulA species were increased in strains defective in DenA or in the COP9 signalosome deneddylase CsnE. However, the accumulation of neddylated cullin was less pronounced in ΔdenA (Figure 4C) indicating that CulA might not be the predominant target of DenA. Nevertheless, these data further support that DenA function in A. nidulans development is rather due to deneddylation than to a Nedd8 processing activity.
Double deletion of csnE and denA abolishes fungal development and accumulates neddylated proteins
An A. nidulans csnE/CSN5 deletion strain defective in the deneddylase subunit of CSN is unresponsive to light and blocked in sexual development. This is accompanied by an altered secondary metabolism represented by an aberrant red color accumulating within the hyphae and the surrounding medium [14], [45], [46]. The denA deletion strain was also unresponsive to light and impaired in asexual development. The developmental interplay between the two fungal deneddylases was analyzed by constructing a double mutant. The ΔdenA/ΔcsnE strain grew poorly but was viable. It combined the phenotypes of both single deletions including the red color phenotype observed in a ΔcsnE strain (Figure 5A) [14]. The A. nidulans double deletion strain was able to grow as vegetative filament. Asexual development was reduced to the marginal level observed in the ΔdenA strain and sexual development was completely abolished (Figure 5A). This corresponds to ΔdenA for asexual development, but goes even further than ΔcsnE which can still initiate but no more complete the sexual cycle [14], [25], [45] (Figure 1A). Western experiments revealed that fungal Nedd8 was detected in crude extracts of A. nidulans wild type, ΔdenA, ΔcsnE and ΔdenA/ΔcsnE. Deletion of either deneddylase alone already resulted in a recognizable increase of the Nedd8 signal compared to wild type. In the ΔdenA strain this was mainly caused by an intensification of multiple Nedd8 signals across a wide molecular weight range. The ΔcsnE strain showed a major increase of the Nedd8 signal around 100 kDa which corresponds to the size of neddylated A. nidulans cullins. The ΔdenA/ΔcsnE strain showed a drastic increase of neddylated proteins, not only compared to wild type, but also to the single deletion strains. This is due to an addition of the effects observed for each single deletion strain and accumulation of an additional band (∼116 kDa) in the ΔdenA/ΔcsnE strain, which might be due to multiple neddylation of a cullin (Figure 5B–5C). This correlated with reduction of free Nedd8 compared to wild type which was most pronounced in the ΔdenA/ΔcsnE strain and to a lower extend also visible in the denA and csnE single deletion mutants (Figure 5B).
The data suggest that A. nidulans without the deneddylases DenA and CSN has lost almost all developmental competence. The double deletion phenotype of only sporadic asexual sporulation and no sexual development is accompanied by an intensive accumulation of neddylated proteins. This suggests that deneddylation by DenA and CSN plays a prominent role in the regulation of fungal developmental programs beyond filamentous growth.
CSN interacts with DEN1/DenA in fungi and humans
We investigated whether the DenA and CSN deneddylases physically interact within the fungal cell. Yeast-2-hybrid analysis revealed a strong interaction of A. nidulans DenA with CsnG/CSN7 and weaker interactions with CsnA/CSN1, CsnE/CSN5 and CsnF/CSN6 of A. nidulans (Figure 6A). This suggests an interaction of DenA with the CSN complex. Bi-molecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) studies [9] were conducted to verify the major interaction of DenA with the CsnG/CSN7 subunit. DenA and CsnG/CSN7 were fused to one half of a split yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) at their N-termini. Expression of the fusion proteins resulted in a fluorescence signal accumulating in the nucleus (Figure 6B) confirming the yeast-2-hybrid result.
An interaction between the DenA deneddylase and the COP9 signalosome deneddylase had not yet been described. We investigated whether DEN1 and CSN also interact in human cells. Separation of HeLa cell lysates by density gradient centrifugation and subsequent western analysis revealed co-sedimentation of CSN and a portion of DEN1 (Figure 6C). This corroborates a physical interaction between the two deneddylases in eukaryotic cells. Flag-pull downs with Flag-CSN2-B8 cells verified the interaction. Flag-labeled CSN complex was pulled down and analyzed by western experiments. These pull downs contain all CSN subunits as well as additional associated proteins [18], [22]. Our analysis demonstrated that DEN1 was co-precipitated with the CSN (Figure 6D).
In order to figure out which CSN subunit mediates the interaction with DEN1 in human cells we performed far western experiments. Selected CSN subunits as shown in Figure 6E were produced recombinant, separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Immuno-blotting with the α-DEN1 antibody showed a strong signal with CSN1 and a weak interaction with CSN2 whereas the other CSN subunits included in the test showed no interaction (Figure 6E, right panel). In control experiments the membranes were stripped and probed again with the α-DEN1 antibody demonstrating that the detected interaction was specific. Additional far-western experiments were performed to specify the site of interaction in CSN1.Wild type human His-CSN1 (1–527), an N-terminal fragment of His-CSN1(1–221) and a C-terminal fragment of His-CSN1(222–527) [22] were applied to these experiments. The results demonstrate a specific binding of DEN1 to His-CSN1wt, as well as to the N-terminal His-CSN1 (1–221) fragment (Figure 6F). All these data indicate a physical interaction between DEN1/DenA and CSN which is conserved from fungi to man.
CSN targets DEN1/DenA for degradation in fungal and human cells
The functional impact of the CSN-DEN1/DenA interaction on the molecular level in fungal and human cells was determined. DenA protein levels were monitored in csn deficient A. nidulans strains during development and compared to wild type cells. Initial experiments revealed that wild type cells produced low amounts of stable DenA protein during vegetative growth but high levels of very unstable DenA during development (Figure 1D; unpublished data). This effect is most prominent during asexual development. We performed repeated western experiments to quantify the effect. Upon deletion of csnG, the DenA interacting CSN subunit, DenA-GFP protein stability occurred to be significantly increased along asexual development compared to wild type cells of the same developmental time points (Figure 7A). These results indicate a function of CSN for DenA degradation in A. nidulans.
We further investigated whether CSN also affects DEN1 stability in human cells as it had been shown for p27Kip1 [47]. DEN1 steady state levels were compared in siGFP and in siCSN1 cells. siGFP cells (control) possess normal levels of CSN and siCSN1 cells are characterized by permanently down regulated CSN amounts [48], [49]. We performed overexpression experiments with transfected constructs of DEN1 (Xpress-DEN1) and CSN1 to study the impact of CSN on DEN1 stability. Ectopically expressed Xpress-DEN1 was much higher in siCSN1 cells as compared to siGFP cells (Figure 7B). Additional overexpression of CSN1 in siCSN1 cells caused a reduction of DEN1 connected with an increase of CSN8 (Figure 7B). We performed inhibitor experiments in order to figure out whether this stability regulation requires proteasomal degradation. Adding the proteasome inhibitor MG132, in addition to cyclohexamide (CHX) treatment, led to a partial accumulation of DEN1 in siGFP cells indicating that DEN1 is degraded at least in part by the proteasome and that the CSN targets it for proteolysis (Figure 7C).
CSN1 is the major DEN1 interacting subunit in human cells, which elevates de novo CSN formation [49]. We analyzed whether CSN1 alone can increase DEN1 degradation in HeLa cells. Cells were co-transfected with CSN1wt, with the N-terminal part of CSN1 (1–221), the DEN1 binding fragment, and with the C-terminal fragment of CSN1 (222–527). As shown in Figure 7D overexpression of CSN1wt and of N-terminal CSN1 (1–221) but not of C-terminal CSN1 (222–527) were sufficient to reduce the DEN1 steady state level in HeLa cells significantly. The reduced steady state Xpress-DEN1 level can be restored by MG132 (Figure 7D, right panel) indicating proteasome dependence.
In summary, these data suggest that the COP9 signalosome supports proteasome-dependent protein degradation of DEN1/DenA in fungi and in human cells.
Discussion
We show here the interplay between the two deneddylases CSN and DEN1/DenA on a molecular and a developmental level of a multicellular organism. CSN and DEN1/DenA physically interact and CSN is involved in DEN1/DenA protein stability regulation. Therefore, CSN is required to control the balance between cellular amounts of the two deneddylases. The physical interaction of the two deneddylases CSN and DEN1 is conserved between different species. There are differences in the affinity of the CSN subunits to DEN1/DenA between organisms. The major DEN1/DenA binding CSN subunit has been changed from CSN2 in S. pombe (Figure S4) to CsnG/CSN7 in A. nidulans or CSN1 in human cells. This might reflect an evolutionary adaptation to the different complexity of developmental processes in these organisms. Down regulation of CSN results in high steady state concentrations of DEN1 in human cells and fungal cells are unable to reduce DenA protein levels during later phases of asexual development. Elevation of the CSN by overexpressing CSN1 [49] reduced the steady state level of DEN1 in human cells. Since the degradation can be blocked at least in part by MG132, the process is most likely proteasome-dependent (Figure 7D). It has been shown before that the CSN targets p53 for proteasomal degradation via phosphorylation by the CSN associated kinase CK2 [50]. In addition, p27Kip is phosphorylated by the CSN which accelerates its degradation by the UPS [51]. At the moment the exact mechanism of CSN mediated proteolysis of DEN1/DenA is not known.
The Drosophila DEN1 mutation genetically suppresses Nedd8 mutant lethality [35]. A developmental phenotype of a deletion of the DEN1/DenA encoding gene has not yet been described. The filamentous fungus A. nidulans allowed us to dissect the developmental functions of both deneddylases, CSN and DenA/DEN1. Fungal denA is crucial for asexual development. In addition, denA is required to reduce the sexual program in response to light as an external signal. A. nidulans strains deficient in CSN are also unresponsive to light, but are blocked in sexual development and disturbed in secondary metabolism [14], [25], [39], [46]. Defects in csn normally do not impair asexual development [14].
Our data suggest that fungal DenA is required to initiate asexual development. After the initial phase of asexual development DenA is normally degraded in a CSN-dependent manner. Defects in csn result in stabilized DenA which still allows asexual development. Sexual development and coordinated secondary metabolism require the CSN deneddylase [14], [25], [39].
Deletion of both deneddylase genes generates a strain which accumulates a red pigment indicating that the secondary metabolism of the fungus might be defective. The mutant strain growth predominantly vegetative and is highly impaired in multicellular development. The denA/csnE double mutant combines the phenotypes of a ΔdenA strain which forms only marginal amounts of asexual spores and of ΔcsnE which is unable to produce sexual fruit bodies. The closest phenotype, reminiscent to the ΔcsnE/ΔdenA strain, has been recently described for CandA [9], the fungal homolog of human Cullin-associated Nedd8-dissociated protein 1 (CAND1) [52]. In general, CAND1 interaction only occurs to non-neddylated cullins and requires deneddylation as prerequisite [52], [53]. Absence of deneddylation activity could stabilize CRL complexes, thereby altering stability, localization or activity of downstream substrates [54]. Given that CSN5 and DEN1/DenA affect various cullin-dependent and independent targets [35] this might result in developmental phenotypes. The CSN complex might function as a mediator between the two deneddylases and their cognate substrates since it also associates to CRLs [19] and other proteins, such as kinases [20] or USP15 [21]. Just like deneddylation, association of CAND1 is required to facilitate adaptor exchange in cullin complexes like the SCFs. Defects in CAND1 can lead to increased stability of certain types of SCF ligase complexes while the formation of others is abolished [10]. This might explain why, in A. nidulans, the defects in sexual differentiation and secondary metabolism of a csnE deletion mutant [14], [45], as well as the asexual phenotype of the denA deletion strain appear not only in the corresponding double deletion mutant, but also in the fungal candA mutants [9]. It is also an indication that both the CSN complex and DenA act in a similar pathway which might converge at the molecular level at the conserved physical interaction of both deneddylases. The CSN affects DenA/DEN1 stability in human and fungal cells. To what extend DenA/DEN1 supports or even substitutes the CsnE/CSN5 mediated deneddylase activity of the CSN complex needs to be resolved. However, only a small fraction of DenA/DEN1 seems to interact with the CSN complex in the living cell as indicated by glycerol gradient experiments from human cells (Figure 6C). Additionally this interaction seems to be very transient suggested from different, repeated pull-down experiments in A. nidulans which did not result in co-purification of DenA and CSN subunits with one another (unpublished data).
Our results imply that the DEN1/DenA enzyme is needed for cleaving a specific isopeptide bond between Nedd8 and target protein(s) required for asexual spore formation which cannot be substituted by CSN. Whether this is one of the three A. nidulans cullins, even a hyperneddylated cullin or a non-cullin protein needs to be elucidated. Only the double mutant strain shows accumulation of an additional band (Figure 5B) which does not correspond in size to any of the three fungal cullins modified with a single Nedd8 moiety, but would fit with hyperneddylated cullin species. Another possibility are non-cullin target proteins for DEN1 as it had been shown in Drosophila where MDM2 is a candidate for DEN1-mediated deneddylation [35]. In mammals DEN1 removes Nedd8 and accelerates MDM2 degradation concomitant with p53 activation [36]. Initially human DEN1 was described as SUMO isopeptidase SENP8 [55] but biochemical in vitro experiments showed only marginal activity towards ubiquitin and SUMO substrates [31], [43] whereas preliminary data suggest that a crosstalk between SUMO and Nedd8 might exist in A. nidulans (unpublished data).
We conclude that the significance of the CSN-DEN1 interaction consists in regulating the balance between the two deneddylases which have different developmental functions. In more complex organisms the readouts are presumably more complicated. While disruption of CSN is embryonic lethal in plants [28], insects [29] and mammals [15], elevated levels of CSN subunits are connected to certain types of cancer in humans [15], [30]. Furthermore, effector caspases can be neddylated and are thereby inactivated by inhibitors of apoptosis. DEN1 reverses the inactivation by neddylation and stimulates apoptosis [37]. DEN1 is presumably involved in the regulation of apoptosis as an important differentiation program, because protein levels were increased by chemotherapy [36]. These are exciting starting points to elucidate the interplay between CSN and DEN1 in other organisms and to elucidate the role of deneddylases in human tumor formation.
Materials and Methods
Cultivation of cells and organisms
Strains of A. nidulans used in this study (Table 1) were cultivated on minimal medium [56] and supplements were added as described earlier [57]. Vegetative mycelium was grown in liquid, submerged culture and development was allowed by growth on agar surface at 30°C or 37°C, respectively. Asexual development was induced by enduring white light and formation of sexual fruiting bodies by growth on oxygen limited, tape-sealed plates in the dark [58]. Induction of the nitrate promoter for BiFC was performed on London Medium [1% glucose, 2% salt solution (26 g/L KCl, 26 g/L MgSO4, 76 g/L KH2PO4, 5% (v/v) trace elements) pH 6.5] plus 70 mM NaNO3 for induction, or 5 mM NH4-tartrate for repression, respectively. Media were supplemented with 100 µM pyridoxine-HCl and/or 5 mM uridine. Selection of transformants carrying the respective resistance cassettes was performed by adding 10 µg/ml phleomycine, 100 ng/ml pyridthiamine or 100 ng/ml nourseothricine (ClonNAT).
Saccharomyces cerevisiae transformants were grown on synthetic complex medium [(0.15% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids and (NH4)2SO4, 0.5% (NH4)2SO4, 0.2 mM myo-inositol, 0.2% amino acid mix (2 g of each standard-l-amino acid except l-histidine, l-leucine, l-tryptophane plus 2 g l-adenine and 0.2 g p-aminobenzoate] at 30°C. Carbon sources were 2% glucose or 2% galactose/1% raffinose, respectively. Amino acids were supplemented as required.
Escherichia coli strain DH5α was employed for the preparation of plasmid DNA and Rosetta or BL21 cells for expression of recombinant GST::denA. Bacteria were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium [1% tryptophane, 0.5% yeast extract, 1% NaCl] in the presence of 100 µg/ml ampicillin, and additionally 50 µg/ml chloramphenicol for Rosetta strains. Solid media contained 2% agar.
HeLa cells were grown at standard conditions using RPMI1640 media supplemented by 10% (v/v) FCS and 2 mM glutamine (Biochrom). HeLa siCSN1 cells exhibiting permanently down regulated CSN and mouse B8 fibroblasts stably expressing Flag-tagged CSN2 were generated and cultured as described earlier [18], [48]. For transient overexpression cells were transfected using Lipofectamin LTX (Invitrogen) according to manufacture specifications. Cells were lyzed and examined as outlined previously [49], [50].
Plasmid construction
Plasmids constructed in this study, as well as primer sequences are given in supporting information Table S1 and Table S2. Details on plasmid construction are described in Text S1.
Aspergillus and yeast strain construction
Aspergillus nidulans strains constructed for this study are listed in Table 1. Details on A. nidulans strain construction and S. cerevisiae strains are given in Text S1.
Molecular methods
Transformation of E. coli and A. nidulans was described previously [59], [60]. Isolation of plasmid DNA from E. coli was performed using the Qiagen-tip 100 MIDI Kit or Qiagen-tip 20 Plasmid MINI Kit, referring to the producer's manual. Isolation of genomic DNA from A. nidulans was carried out as described earlier [61]. A. nidulans total RNA was isolated from 0.5 ml of ground mycelia with the Qiagen RNeasy Plant Mini Kit referring to the manufacturer's instructions. Southern hybridization was carried out with non-radioactive probes using the AlkPhos Direct labeling and detection system from GE Healthcare following the manufacturer's guidelines. Northern hybridization was performed according to standard techniques [62]. DNA fragments for hybridization probes, plasmid construction or sequencing were amplified by PCR with the Taq- (Fermentas), Pfu- (Promega), or Phusion- (Finzymes) polymerase, respectively. A. nidulans cDNA was generated from total RNA using the Omniscript RT Kit (Qiagen) following the user's manual. Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) [41] was achieved by using the GeneRacer Kit (Invitrogen) together with the SuperScriptII reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) following the protocol provided by the company. DNA sequencing was performed by the Göttingen Genomics Laboratory and Eurofins MWG Operon.
Quantification methods
Radial growth tests and quantification of conidiospores were described previously [45], [63]. Cleistothecia were quantified from 7 days sexually grown cultures. Surface pictures of plated cultures (150 fold magnification) were collected with an Olympus SZX12 binocular connected to a Kappa PS30 camera. Cleistothecia within a 4×4 field grid of 1 mm2 in size were counted and multiplied to obtain the number per cm2.
Pixel density values for western quantification were obtained from TIFF files directly generated with the Fusion-SL 4.2 MP detection system (Peqlab) or from digitized X-ray films (Kodak) and analyzed with the ImageJ software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/index.html). Before comparison, sample density values were adjusted according to an appropriate loading control. The ratio of GFP-DenA and the non-degradable GFP-tag was applied as a measure for steady state DenA stability. No loading control was performed for these experiments as the ratio is independent of the amount of total protein. For all other quantitative experiments means of adjusted density values were compared and observed differences between individual samples were verified by statistical analysis using GraphPad Prism 5.01 (www.graphpad.com) where indicated.
Computational methods
Blast searches were made at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Sequence analysis was conducted using the Dnastar Lasergene 8.0 software. Protein alignments by ClustalW were carried out at Network Protein Sequence Analysis (http://npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr). Protein motif identification was performed using InterProScan (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/InterProScan/).
Protein isolation
Preparation of whole cell extracts from S. cerevisiae was described previously [64]. Crude extracts from Aspergillus were obtained by grinding mycelia to a fine powder and extraction of soluble proteins with buffer containing 100 mM Tris-HCl, 200 mM NaCl, 20% glycerol, 5 mM EDTA, pH 8 freshly supplemented with Complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), 14 mM ß-mercaptoethanol at 4°C. Protein concentration was estimated using the Bio-Rad assay solution following the manufacturer's guidelines.
Western experiments
Proteins were denatured in SDS loading dye by heating at 95°C for 10 min and subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by transfer to a nitrocellulose membrane (Whatman). Detection was carried out using the Enhanced ChemiLuminescence (ECL) method described by Tesfaigzi et al. [65], or by using the Pierce detection kit (Thermo Scientific). Signals were recorded on X-ray films (Kodak), Hyperfilm ECL (GE Healthcare) or with a Fusion-SL 4.2 MP detection system (Peqlab).
Antibodies
Primary antibodies for yeast extracts were directed against Rub1 (N0580-05, US-Biological), Cdc53 (sc-6716, Santa Cruz), LexA (sc-1725, Santa Cruz) and the V5 epitope (R960-25, Invitrogen). GFP fusion proteins were detected using α-GFP antibody (sc-9996, Santa Cruz) and His tagged proteins by α-His-Tag antibody (70796-4, Novagen). For A. nidulans experiments α-Actin antibody was purchased from Novus Biochemicals (NB100-74340,) and for experiments with human cells α-Actin and α-γ-Tubulin were purchased from SantaCruz. A Polyclonal antibody directed against Nedd8 was obtained by rabbit immunization with an N-terminal peptide of A. nidulans Nedd8 (GenScript). α-DEN1, α-CSN1 and α-CSN8 antibodies were purchased from Enzo, anti-Express from Invitrogen, α-Flag from Stratagene. HRP labeled secondary antibodies were purchased from Jackson Immuno Research, Invitrogen or Seramun.
Purification of recombinant GST-DenA/DEN1 from E. coli
pGEX4T3 (Amersham) plasmids carrying the respective fusion construct were transformed into competent E. coli BL21 and transformants selected on LB medium containing ampicillin (100 µg/ml). 10 ml culture was inoculated with a single colony and grown overnight at 37°C on a rotary shaker. 10 ml of overnight-culture were applied to inoculate 250 ml of LB medium. After growth to an OD600 = 0.4–0.6 at 37°C on a rotary shaker protein expression was induced by adding 1 mM IPTG and further incubation for 2 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation resuspended in 10 ml of buffer 1 (20 mM Tris-HCl, 200 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT) and disintegrated by ultrasonification. The lysate was centrifuged for 15 min at 10.000×g and GST-DenA/DEN1 bound using Glutathione-agarose from Sigma. Beads and supernatant were incubated for 1 h at 4°C with slow rotation. The bead containing solution was transferred to a poly-propylene column (BioRad) and the flow through was discarded. Beads were washed 4 times with 10 ml buffer 1 and proteins were eluted with buffer 2 [50 mM Tris, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM reduced glutathione pH 8.0]. For further concentration of probes and buffer exchange to PBS pH 7.4, AMICON Ultra filter devices (10 K) were used following the manufacturer's guidelines.
Biochemical analysis and interaction studies
For glycerol gradient centrifugation cells were lyzed referring to Leppert et al. [49] and density gradient centrifugation was performed in 20 mM Tris; pH 7.2; 50 mM KCl; 1 mM β-mercaptoethanol using a glycerol gradient from 5% to 40% and a rotor TLA 100.3 (Beckman) at 70.000 RPM for 1 h. The gradient was calibrated with purified CSN (about 400 kDa) and with purified 20S proteasome (about 700 kDa). Flag pull downs were described before [18]. Anti-Flag beads and the Flag peptide were purchased from Sigma. Filter-binding assays (far-western experiments) were outlined in detail [66]. The Nedd8-GFP fusion plasmid was kindly provided by Michael Glickman. Protein purification of Nedd8-GFP was carried out under denaturing conditions using Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's specifications. Deneddylation of Nedd8-GFP was carried out for 30 min at 37°C in buffer containing 30 mM Tris, 10 mM KCl, 5 mM DTT (pH 7.8). The CUL1 plasmid was obtained from BA Schulman and purified according to [67]. In vitro neddylation of the construct consisting of CUL1 associated to RBX1 was performed as described elsewhere [6] and residual unconjugated Nedd8 removed by an additional GST-purification step. Deneddylation was performed in 20 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl and 5 mM DTT without prior elution of the Nedd8-CUL1-RBX1 (approximately 60 kDa) from GST-beads. Samples were taken after incubation at 37°C for 30 min, boiled at 95°C for 10 min. in sample buffer and analyzed by western experiments.
Yeast-2-hybrid
A. nidulans protein interactions were tested with the yeast-2-hybrid based interaction trap [68] following existing protocols [14], [69]. S. pombe yeast-2-hybrid was performed using the Matchmaker GAL4-based assay (Clontech).
Microscopy
A. nidulans colonies, hyphae and structures were visualized by photography with an Olympus CS30 digital camera combined with an Olympus SZX-ILLB2-200 binocular or a Zeiss Axiolab microscope. Pictures were edited and calibrated for magnification with the cellSens software (Olympus). Fluorescent microscopy was performed using a Zeiss Axio Observer Z.1 system with Zeiss PlanAPOCHROMAT 63×/1,4oil or Zeiss PlanAPOCHROMAT 100×/1,4oil objective, respectively. Pictures were obtained with a QuantEM:512SC (Photometrics) or a Coolsnap HQ2 (Photometrics) camera and the SlideBook 5.0 imaging software (Intelligent Imaging Innovations Inc.). Membranes were visualized by staining with 1 µm FM4-64 (Invitrogen). Nuclei were stained with 1 µm DAPI (4′,6-diamidin-2-phenylindol). For localization studies exposure times were GFP: 1500 ms, RFP: 25 ms, DIC: 100 ms and in BiFC experiments exposure times were YFP: 2000 ms, DAPI: 20 ms, DIC: 100 ms.
Supporting Information
Zdroje
1. KerscherO, FelberbaumR, HochstrasserM (2006) Modification of Proteins by Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-Like Proteins. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology
2. HershkoA, CiechanoverA (1998) The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem 67: 425–479.
3. PetroskiMD, DeshaiesRJ (2005) Function and regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 9–20.
4. von Zeska Kress MR, Harting R, Bayram O, Christmann M, Irmer H, et al.. (2012) The COP9 signalosome prevents the accumulation of cullin SCF ubiquitin E3 RING ligases during fungal development. Mol Microbiol, accepted for publication.
5. MorimotoM, NishidaT, NagayamaY, YasudaH (2003) Nedd8-modification of Cul1 is promoted by Roc1 as a Nedd8-E3 ligase and regulates its stability. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 301: 392–398.
6. DudaDM, BorgLA, ScottDC, HuntHW, HammelM, et al. (2008) Structural insights into NEDD8 activation of cullin-RING ligases: conformational control of conjugation. Cell 134: 995–1006.
7. WatsonIR, IrwinMS, OhhM (2011) NEDD8 pathways in cancer, Sine Quibus Non. Cancer Cell 19: 168–176.
8. LiuJ, FurukawaM, MatsumotoT, XiongY (2002) NEDD8 modification of CUL1 dissociates p120(CAND1), an inhibitor of CUL1-SKP1 binding and SCF ligases. Mol Cell 10: 1511–1518.
9. HelmstaedtK, SchwierEU, ChristmannM, NahlikK, WestermannM, et al. (2011) Recruitment of the inhibitor Cand1 to the cullin substrate adaptor site mediates interaction to the neddylation site. Mol Biol Cell 22: 153–164.
10. SchmidtMW, McQuaryPR, WeeS, HofmannK, WolfDA (2009) F-box-directed CRL complex assembly and regulation by the CSN and CAND1. Mol Cell 35: 586–597.
11. Schmaler T, Dubiel W (2010) Control of deneddylation by the COP9 signalosome; Groettrup M, editor. Austin, New York: Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media. 57–68 p.
12. ReverterD, WuK, ErdeneTG, PanZQ, WilkinsonKD, et al. (2005) Structure of a complex between Nedd8 and the Ulp/Senp protease family member Den1. Journal of Molecular Biology 345: 141–151.
13. WadaH, KitoK, CaskeyLS, YehET, KamitaniT (1998) Cleavage of the C-terminus of NEDD8 by UCH-L3. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 251: 688–692.
14. BuschS, SchwierEU, NahlikK, BayramO, HelmstaedtK, et al. (2007) An eight-subunit COP9 signalosome with an intact JAMM motif is required for fungal fruit body formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 8089–8094.
15. KatoJY, Yoneda-KatoN (2009) Mammalian COP9 signalosome. Genes to Cells 14: 1209–1225.
16. CopeGA, SuhGS, AravindL, SchwarzSE, ZipurskySL, et al. (2002) Role of predicted metalloprotease motif of Jab1/Csn5 in cleavage of Nedd8 from Cul1. Science 298: 608–611.
17. DeshaiesRJ, JoazeiroCA (2009) RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annual Review of Biochemistry 78: 399–434.
18. HuangX, HetfeldBK, SeifertU, KahneT, KloetzelPM, et al. (2005) Consequences of COP9 signalosome and 26S proteasome interaction. Febs J 272: 3909–3917.
19. EnchevRI, ScottDC, da FonsecaPC, SchreiberA, MondaJK, et al. (2012) Structural Basis for a Reciprocal Regulation between SCF and CSN. Cell Rep 2: 616–627.
20. UhleS, MedaliaO, WaldronR, DumdeyR, HenkleinP, et al. (2003) Protein kinase CK2 and protein kinase D are associated with the COP9 signalosome. EMBO Journal 22: 1302–1312.
21. HetfeldBK, HelfrichA, KapelariB, ScheelH, HofmannK, et al. (2005) The zinc finger of the CSN-associated deubiquitinating enzyme USP15 is essential to rescue the E3 ligase Rbx1. Current Biology 15: 1217–1221.
22. HuangX, LangelotzC, Hetfeld-PechocBK, SchwenkW, DubielW (2009) The COP9 signalosome mediates beta-catenin degradation by deneddylation and blocks adenomatous polyposis coli destruction via USP15. Journal of Molecular Biology 391: 691–702.
23. SchwechheimerC, SerinoG, CallisJ, CrosbyWL, LyapinaS, et al. (2001) Interactions of the COP9 signalosome with the E3 ubiquitin ligase SCFTIRI in mediating auxin response. Science 292: 1379–1382.
24. WolfDA, ZhouC, WeeS (2003) The COP9 signalosome: an assembly and maintenance platform for cullin ubiquitin ligases? Nat Cell Biol 5: 1029–1033.
25. BrausGH, IrnigerS, BayramO (2010) Fungal development and the COP9 signalosome. Curr Opin Microbiol 13: 672–676.
26. KnowlesA, KohK, WuJT, ChienCT, ChamovitzDA, et al. (2009) The COP9 signalosome is required for light-dependent timeless degradation and Drosophila clock resetting. J Neurosci 29: 1152–1162.
27. ZhouZ, WangY, CaiG, HeQ (2012) Neurospora COP9 signalosome integrity plays major roles for hyphal growth, conidial development, and circadian function. PLoS Genet 8: e1002712 doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002712.
28. WeiN, DengXW (1999) Making sense of the COP9 signalosome. A regulatory protein complex conserved from Arabidopsis to human. Trends Genet 15: 98–103.
29. FreilichS, OronE, KappY, Nevo-CaspiY, OrgadS, et al. (1999) The COP9 signalosome is essential for development of Drosophila melanogaster. Current Biology 9: 1187–1190.
30. FukumotoA, IkedaN, ShoM, TomodaK, KanehiroH, et al. (2004) Prognostic significance of localized p27Kip1 and potential role of Jab1/CSN5 in pancreatic cancer. Oncology Reports 11: 277–284.
31. Gan-ErdeneT, NagamalleswariK, YinL, WuK, PanZQ, et al. (2003) Identification and characterization of DEN1, a deneddylase of the ULP family. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278: 28892–28900.
32. ShenLN, LiuH, DongC, XirodimasD, NaismithJH, et al. (2005) Structural basis of NEDD8 ubiquitin discrimination by the deNEDDylating enzyme NEDP1. EMBO Journal 24: 1341–1351.
33. WuK, YamoahK, DoliosG, Gan-ErdeneT, TanP, et al. (2003) DEN1 is a dual function protease capable of processing the C terminus of Nedd8 and deconjugating hyper-neddylated CUL1. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278: 28882–28891.
34. ZhouL, WattsFZ (2005) Nep1, a Schizosaccharomyces pombe deneddylating enzyme. Biochemical Journal 389: 307–314.
35. ChanY, YoonJ, WuJT, KimHJ, PanKT, et al. (2008) DEN1 deneddylates non-cullin proteins in vivo. Journal of Cell Science 121: 3218–3223.
36. WatsonIR, LiBK, RocheO, BlanchA, OhhM, et al. (2010) Chemotherapy induces NEDP1-mediated destabilization of MDM2. Oncogene 29: 297–304.
37. BroemerM, TenevT, RigboltKT, HempelS, BlagoevB, et al. (2010) Systematic in vivo RNAi analysis identifies IAPs as NEDD8-E3 ligases. Molecular Cell 40: 810–822.
38. AxelrodDE, GealtM, PastushokM (1973) Gene control of developmental competence in Aspergillus nidulans. Dev Biol 34: 9–15.
39. BayramO, BrausGH (2011) Coordination of secondary metabolism and development in fungi: the velvet family of regulatory proteins. FEMS Microbiol Rev
40. GalaganJE, CalvoSE, CuomoC, MaLJ, WortmanJR, et al. (2005) Sequencing of Aspergillus nidulans and comparative analysis with A. fumigatus and A. oryzae. Nature 438: 1105–1115.
41. FrohmanMA, DushMK, MartinGR (1988) Rapid production of full-length cDNAs from rare transcripts: amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 85: 8998–9002.
42. BayramO, BrausGH, FischerR, Rodriguez-RomeroJ (2010) Spotlight on Aspergillus nidulans photosensory systems. Fungal Genet Biol 47: 900–908.
43. MendozaHM, ShenLN, BottingC, LewisA, ChenJ, et al. (2003) NEDP1, a highly conserved cysteine protease that deNEDDylates Cullins. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278: 25637–25643.
44. LinghuB, CallisJ, GoeblMG (2002) Rub1p processing by Yuh1p is required for wild-type levels of Rub1p conjugation to Cdc53p. Eukaryot Cell 1: 491–494.
45. BuschS, EckertSE, KrappmannS, BrausGH (2003) The COP9 signalosome is an essential regulator of development in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Molecular Microbiology 49: 717–730.
46. NahlikK, DumkowM, BayramO, HelmstaedtK, BuschS, et al. (2010) The COP9 signalosome mediates transcriptional and metabolic response to hormones, oxidative stress protection and cell wall rearrangement during fungal development. Mol Microbiol 78: 964–979.
47. TomodaK, KubotaY, ArataY, MoriS, MaedaM, et al. (2002) The cytoplasmic shuttling and subsequent degradation of p27Kip1 mediated by Jab1/CSN5 and the COP9 signalosome complex. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277: 2302–2310.
48. PethA, BerndtC, HenkeW, DubielW (2007) Downregulation of COP9 signalosome subunits differentially affects the CSN complex and target protein stability. BMC Biochem 8: 27.
49. LeppertU, HenkeW, HuangX, MullerJM, DubielW (2011) Post-transcriptional fine-tuning of COP9 signalosome subunit biosynthesis is regulated by the c-Myc/Lin28B/let-7 pathway. J Mol Biol 409: 710–721.
50. Bech-OtschirD, KraftR, HuangX, HenkleinP, KapelariB, et al. (2001) COP9 signalosome-specific phosphorylation targets p53 to degradation by the ubiquitin system. EMBO Journal 20: 1630–1639.
51. HuangX, WagnerE, DumdeyR, PethA, BerseM, et al. (2006) Phosphorylation by COP9 signalosome-associated CK2 promotes degradation of p27 during the G1 cell cycle phase. Israel Journal of Chemistry 46: 231–238.
52. ZhengJ, YangX, HarrellJM, RyzhikovS, ShimEH, et al. (2002) CAND1 binds to unneddylated CUL1 and regulates the formation of SCF ubiquitin E3 ligase complex. Mol Cell 10: 1519–1526.
53. HwangJW, MinKW, TamuraTA, YoonJB (2003) TIP120A associates with unneddylated cullin 1 and regulates its neddylation. FEBS Lett 541: 102–108.
54. WuJT, LinHC, HuYC, ChienCT (2005) Neddylation and deneddylation regulate Cul1 and Cul3 protein accumulation. Nat Cell Biol 7: 1014–1020.
55. MukhopadhyayD, DassoM (2007) Modification in reverse: the SUMO proteases. Trends Biochem Sci 32: 286–295.
56. Bennet JW, Lasure LL (1991) Growth media. In: Bennet JW, Lasure LL, editors. More Gene Manipulation in Fungi. San Diego: Academic Press Inc. pp. 441–457.
57. KäferE (1977) Meiotic and mitotic recombination in Aspergillus and its chromosomal aberrations. Adv Genet 19: 33–131.
58. Clutterbuck AJ (1974) Aspergillus nidulans. In: King RC, editor. Handbook of Genetics. New York: Plenum. pp. 447–510.
59. InoueH, NojimaH, OkayamaH (1990) High efficiency transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. Gene 96: 23–28.
60. EckertSE, KublerE, HoffmannB, BrausGH (2000) The tryptophan synthase-encoding trpB gene of Aspergillus nidulans is regulated by the cross-pathway control system. Mol Gen Genet 263: 867–876.
61. Lee BS, Taylor JW (1990) Isolation of DNA from fungal mycelia and single spores. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JS, White TJ, editors. PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications. San Diego: Academic Press Inc. pp. 282–287.
62. RaveN, CrkvenjakovR, BoedtkerH (1979) Identification of procollagen mRNAs transferred to diazobenzyloxymethyl paper from formaldehyde agarose gels. Nucleic Acids Res 6: 3559–3567.
63. BussinkHJ, OsmaniSA (1998) A cyclin-dependent kinase family member (PHOA) is required to link developmental fate to environmental conditions in Aspergillus nidulans. EMBO J 17: 3990–4003.
64. Streckfuss-BomekeK, SchulzeF, HerzogB, ScholzE, BrausGH (2009) Degradation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription factor Gcn4 requires a C-terminal nuclear localization signal in the cyclin Pcl5. Eukaryot Cell 8: 496–510.
65. TesfaigziJ, Smith-HarrisonW, CarlsonDM (1994) A simple method for reusing western blots on PVDF membranes. Biotechniques 17: 268–269.
66. KapelariB, Bech-OtschirD, HegerlR, SchadeR, DumdeyR, et al. (2000) Electron microscopy and subunit-subunit interaction studies reveal a first architecture of COP9 signalosome. Journal of Molecular Biology 300: 1169–1178.
67. LiT, PavletichNP, SchulmanBA, ZhengN (2005) High-level expression and purification of recombinant SCF ubiquitin ligases. Methods Enzymol 398: 125–142.
68. Golemis E, Serebriiskii I, Finley RJ, Kolonin M, Gyuris J, et al.. (1999) Interaction trap/two-hybrid system to identify interacting proteins. In: Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidmann JG et al.., editors. Current protocols in molecular biology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 20.21.21–20.21.40.
69. HelmstaedtK, LaubingerK, VosskuhlK, BayramO, BuschS, et al. (2008) The nuclear migration protein NUDF/LIS1 forms a complex with NUDC and BNFA at spindle pole bodies. Eukaryot Cell 7: 1041–1052.
70. JiangR, CarlsonM (1997) The Snf1 protein kinase and its activating subunit, Snf4, interact with distinct domains of the Sip1/Sip2/Gal83 component in the kinase complex. Mol Cell Biol 17: 2099–2106.
71. NayakT, SzewczykE, OakleyCE, OsmaniA, UkilL, et al. (2006) A versatile and efficient gene-targeting system for Aspergillus nidulans. Genetics 172: 1557–1566.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukční medicínaČlánek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2013 Číslo 2
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Complex Inheritance of Melanoma and Pigmentation of Coat and Skin in Grey Horses
- Coordination of Chromatid Separation and Spindle Elongation by Antagonistic Activities of Mitotic and S-Phase CDKs
- Autophagy Induction Is a Tor- and Tp53-Independent Cell Survival Response in a Zebrafish Model of Disrupted Ribosome Biogenesis
- Assembly of the Auditory Circuitry by a Genetic Network in the Mouse Brainstem