Elongator Complex Influences Telomeric Gene Silencing and DNA Damage Response by Its Role in Wobble Uridine tRNA Modification

Summary

Elongator complex is required for formation of the side chains at position 5 of modified nucleosides 5-carbamoylmethyluridine (ncm⁵U₃₄), 5-methoxycarbonylmethyluridine (mcm⁵U₃₄), and 5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-2-thiouridine (mcm⁵s²U₃₄) at wobble position in tRNA. These modified nucleosides are important for efficient decoding during translation. In a recent publication, Elongator complex was implicated to participate in telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response by interacting with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Here we show that elevated levels of tRNA^Lys_s²UUU, tRNA^Gln_s²UUG, and tRNA^Glu_s²UUC, which in a wild-type background contain the mcm⁵s²U nucleoside at position 34, suppress the defects in telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response observed in the Elongator mutants. We also found that the reported differences in telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response of various elp3 alleles correlated with the levels of modified nucleosides at U₃₄. Defects in telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response are also observed in strains with the tuc2Δ mutation, which abolish the formation of the 2-thio group of the mcm⁵s²U nucleoside in tRNA^Lys_mcm⁵s²UUU, tRNA^Gln_mcm⁵s²UUG, and tRNA^Glu_mcm⁵s²UUC. These observations show that Elongator complex does not directly participate in telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response, but rather that modified nucleosides at U₃₄ are important for efficient expression of gene products involved in these processes. Consistent with this notion, we found that expression of Sir4, a silent information regulator required for assembly of silent chromatin at telomeres, was decreased in the elp3Δ mutants.

Introduction

Elongator complex, first identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, consists of a core complex, Elp1–Elp3 and a sub-complex, Elp4–Elp6 [1]–[3]. Orthologs of Elp1 to Elp4 has been identified in higher eukaryotes and a six-subunit Elongator complex has been purified from humans [4]–[5]. In yeast, Elongator mutants display pleiotropic phenotypes in multiple cellular processes including RNA polymerase II transcription and exocytosis [1]–[3], [6]–[9]. A crucial observation in understanding the role of the yeast Elongator complex was the discovery of its requirement for formation of 5-carbamoylmethyl (ncm⁵) and 5-methoxycarbonylmethyl (mcm⁵) side chains of wobble uridines [10]. In yeast Elongator mutants, the formation of ncm⁵ and mcm⁵ side chains were abolished in the 11 tRNA species that normally contain one of these two side chains [10]–[12]. Elongator complex in C. elegans and A. thaliana is also required for formation of ncm⁵ and mcm⁵ side chains at wobble uridines [13]–[14]. When the ncm⁵ and mcm⁵ side chains were eliminated, the corresponding tRNA species acted less efficiently in translation [12]. Although lack of modifications at position 5 affects the decoding properties of many tRNAs, it appears that the pleiotropic phenotypes of Elongator mutants are predominantly due to decreased translational decoding by hypomodified and [15]. Simultaneous over-expression of hypomodified and , which both have the mcm⁵s²U modification at wobble position U₃₄ in wild type strains, compensated all phenotypes observed in Elongator mutants including those in RNA polymerase II transcription and exocytosis without restoring formation of ncm⁵ and mcm⁵ side chains in tRNA [15]. These observations not only argue against a direct involvement of Elongator complex in other cellular processes than tRNA modification, but they also suggest that the mcm⁵ side chain is important for efficient translation of mRNAs encoding gene products critical for the processes in which Elongator mutants generate phenotypes.

In eukaryotes, the whole genome is packed into a nucleoprotein complex known as chromatin through which the genetic material is processed to regulate cellular processes including transcription, cell division, DNA replication and DNA repair [16]–[17]. Chromatin properties can be altered by the posttranscriptional modifications of histones including acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation and ubiquitination [16]. The Elp3 protein of Elongator complex contains a tentative histone acetyltransferase (HAT) domain in the C-terminal region and the histone acetylation levels are decreased in elp3 mutants [7]. However, the reduced histone acetylation levels in the elp3 mutant were restored by increased expression of and , indicating that the involvement of Elongator complex in chromatin remodeling is indirect [15]. In addition to the HAT domain, Elp3 contains an N-terminal region with sequence similarity to the radical S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) enzymes [18]. A recent report showed that Elongator mutants have a partial loss of telomeric gene silencing and are sensitive to DNA damage agents [19]. It was also observed that strains with different point mutations in the ELP3 gene, resulting in amino acid substitutions in the radical SAM and HAT domains, displayed differences in telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response [19]. The participation of Elongator complex in telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response was linked to its interaction with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a protein involved in DNA replication and DNA repair [19].

In this report, we demonstrate that defects observed in DNA damage response and telomeric gene silencing of yeast Elongator mutants are caused by the absence of wobble uridine tRNA modifications. So far, all phenotypes observed in yeast Elongator mutants can be explained by their influence on tRNA modification. We conclude that the primary role of Elongator complex in yeast is in formation of ncm⁵ and mcm⁵ side chains at U₃₄ of tRNAs.

Results

Elevated levels of hypomodified tRNA^Lys_s²UUU, tRNA^Gln_s²UUG, and tRNA^Glu_s²UUC suppress defects in telomeric silencing and DNA damage response induced by Elongator mutants

In a recent report, Elongator mutants were shown to have decreased telomeric gene silencing, which was investigated by using an ura3-1 strain with a wild-type copy of the URA3 gene inserted near the left telomere of chromosome VII [19]. Cells with increased expression of Ura3 show reduced growth on plates containing 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) since the nontoxic 5-FOA is converted to the toxic 5-flurouracil by the URA3 gene product. In such a strain, 30–50% of the cell population are resistant to 5-FOA [20]. The URA3 gene was expressed in a population of cells in both wild type and elp3Δ strains (Figure 1A). However, the elp3Δ strain grew poorly on the 5-FOA containing plates compared to the wild type (Figure 1A), suggesting that telomeric gene silencing was decreased in the elp3Δ strain. Since we earlier showed that the primary function of Elongator complex is in formation of wobble uridine tRNA modifications, we investigated whether increased levels of hypomodified , and could suppress the defects in telomeric gene silencing of an elp3Δ strain. Over-expression of these tRNA species significantly improved the growth of the elp3Δ strain on 5-FOA plates (Figure 1B). The telomeric gene silencing defect of Elongator mutants was also investigated by using a color assay with the ADE2 marker inserted near the telomeric region. The elp3 mutant forms white color colonies due to loss of silencing of ADE2, which could be rescued by increased expression of , and (data not shown). This observation confirmed that Elongator mutants have a defect in telomeric gene silencing, which is caused by a translational dysfunction. The decreased telomeric silencing observed in other Elongator deletion mutants (elp1Δ, elp2Δ, elp4Δ, elp5Δ and elp6Δ) was also suppressed by elevated levels of , and (Figure 1C). Elongator mutants are also sensitive to DNA damaging agents, especially hydroxyurea (HU) [19] (Figure 2). Similar to the defect in telomeric gene silencing, the HU sensitivity of Elongator mutants was suppressed by elevated levels of , and (Figure 2). Collectively, these observations indicate that the reduced gene silencing in telomeric regions and the defect in DNA damage response of Elongator mutants is caused by inefficient translation due to lack of wobble uridine tRNA modifications.

To investigate which of the , and species most efficiently suppressed the defects in telomeric silencing and DNA damage response of the elp3Δ strain, we introduced plasmids encoding these tRNAs independently or in various combinations into the mutant. Increased expression of alone could efficiently suppress the telomeric silencing defect and the HU-sensitivity of an elp3Δ strain (Figure S1). Simultaneous over-expression of , and gave a minor improvement in suppression of the telomeric gene silencing defect compared to over-expression of alone (Figure S1A). In the HU sensitivity assay, increased expression of together with improved the suppression compared to that of and was as good as elevated levels of , and (Figure S1B). These results indicate that certain open reading frames, encoding gene products critical for telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response, might be enriched in AAA, CAA and GAA codons. Of these three codons, translation of AAA codons by seems to be most affected by lack of the mcm⁵ side chain.

Synergistic growth reduction and HU sensitivity of elp3Δ asf1Δ or elp3Δ rtt109Δ strains are compensated by increased expression of tRNA^Lys_s²UUU, tRNA^Gln_s²UUG, and tRNA^Glu_s²UUC

Asf1 functions as a histone chaperone to direct the histone acetyltransferase Rtt109 in substrate selection and stimulate its acetyltransferase activity [21]–[23]. The combination of elp3Δ asf1Δ or elp3Δ rtt109Δ mutations causes synergistic phenotypes to the strains, such as a more pronounced reduction in growth and increased sensitivity to HU (Figure 3 and Figure S2), which was suggested to be caused by loss of histone acetylation in the elp3Δ strain [19]. GCN5 encodes a histone acetyltransferase that acetylate H2B and H3 [24]–[25]. Previously it was shown that the elp3Δ gcn5Δ mutations generate a synergistic growth reduction [26]. However, increased levels of hypomodified tRNAs suppressed the synergistic growth reduction caused by the elp3Δ gcn5Δ mutations, and restore the histone acetylation levels in the elp3Δ mutant but not in the gcn5Δ strain [15]. When we over-expressed , and from a high copy vector in the elp3Δ asf1Δ or elp3Δ rtt109Δ double mutants, the growth reduction and HU sensitivity of the double mutants were similar to the defects observed in an asf1Δ or rtt109Δ strain, respectively (Figure 3 and Figure S2). These observations support the earlier conclusion that Elp3 is not directly required for histone acetylation [15].

Wobble uridine tRNA modification levels correlate to phenotypic variations generated by different mutant alleles of the ELP3 gene

Elp3 contains two conserved domains, a radical S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) domain in the N-terminal region and a putative histone acetyltransferase (HAT) domain located in C-terminal end (Figure 4A). Most strains expressing Elp3 proteins with amino acid substitutions in these two domains showed a reduction in telomeric gene silencing and HU resistance [19] (Figure 4). The elp3-C103A and elp3-G168R mutations did not influence telomeric gene silencing and HU sensitivity (Figure 4B and 4C) [19]. The elp3-Y540A and elp3-Y541A mutations partially reduced telomeric gene silencing and increased HU sensitivity but not as much as elp3Δ (Figure 4B and 4C) [19]. The remaining strains were similar as an elp3Δ null strain in telomeric gene silencing and HU sensitivity (Figure 4B and 4C) [19]. Moreover, all strains carrying individual mutations listed in Figure 4A except for elp3-C103A were resistant to Kluyveromyces lactis killer toxin (data not shown), indicating that these mutants have a defect in formation of wobble uridines tRNA modification [11].

To examine the status of wobble uridine tRNA modification in these elp3 mutants, total tRNAs from these mutants were isolated and analyzed by HPLC. The elp3-C103A and elp3-G168R mutants, which did not have defects in telomeric silencing and DNA damage response, had 96% and 51% mcm⁵s²U left, respectively (Figure 5, Table 1). Mutations in the HAT domain did not completely eliminate the formation of wobble uridine modifications, both elp3-Y540A and elp3-Y541A have 2 or 6% mcm⁵s²U left compared to the wild type (Figure 5, Table 1). In the rest of mutants, the mcm⁵ side chain formation was entirely abolished (Figure 5, Table 1). We conclude that phenotypes exhibited by elp3 mutants correlate with the levels of wobble uridine tRNA modification.

Different mcm⁵ modification levels correlate with ochre stop codon read through by a suppressor tRNA

Our observations suggest that phenotypes of Elongator mutants are caused by an inefficient translation due to lack of tRNA modification. If our model is correct, reduction in modification levels in elp3 mutants should result in decreased translation efficiency. To analyze whether the modification levels of different elp3 mutants listed in Table 1 influence translation efficiency, we used a dual-luciferase reporter system (Figure 6A) [27] to measure the ochre stop codon read through by a suppressor tRNA encoded by the SUP4 allele. The SUP4 allele encodes a suppressor with a G₃₄ to U₃₄ substitution in its anticodon. The U₃₄ of this suppressor tRNA is modified at position 5 with a mcm side chain [10]. Presence of this modification improves the ability of the suppressor tRNA to read UAA ochre stop codons [10], [12].

In the dual-luciferase construct, the Renilla and firefly luciferase genes are separated by an UAA ochre stop codon [27]. Read through of the ochre stop codon was determined by calculating the ratio of firefly luciferase activity to Renilla luciferase activity. This ratio was compared to the value obtained from a control construct in which a CAA codon replaces the UAA stop codon (Figure 6A). Due to lack of mcm⁵ side chain in the SUP4 tRNA, the stop codon read through in the elp3Δ strain is reduced to 46% of wild type (t-test, p = 0.001), supporting that the mcm⁵ side chain is important for efficient decoding (Figure 6B). In the elp3-G168R mutant, in which the mcm⁵ side chain is reduced to 51%, the level of read through was significantly decreased compared to that in wild type (t-test, p = 0.008), but is higher than that observed in strains carrying the elp3-Y540A, elp3-Y541A or elp3Δ alleles (t-test, p = 0.04 and 0.03 respectively) (Figure 6B). In the elp3-Y540A and elp3-Y541A mutants, a small fraction of total tRNA was modified (2–6%) (Figure 5, Table 1), which contributed to an improvement of stop codon read through by the SUP4 suppressor tRNA compared to the elp3Δ strain (t-test, p = 0.004 and 0.006 respectively) (Figure 6B). In mutant alleles eliminating formation of the mcm⁵ side chain, no differences were observed in stop codon read through by the SUP4-encoded suppressor tRNA compared to the elp3 null mutant (Figure S3). These data show that reduced mcm⁵ modification levels correlate with decreased translational efficiency.

Defects in telomeric silencing and DNA damage response are also observed in strains unable to form the s² group of mcm⁵s²U

Our findings that the defects in telomeric silencing and DNA damage response in Elongator mutants were bypassed by elevated levels of , and indicated that the mcm⁵ side chain in tRNA is critical for the expression of gene products in these two processes (Figure 1 and Figure 2). In addition to the mcm side chain at position 5 of U₃₄, these three tRNAs also contain a 2-thio group forming mcm⁵s²U. Since the s² group is also important for decoding [12], [15], [28], we hypothesized that strains deficient in formation of the 2-thio group might also display defects in telomeric silencing and DNA damage response as Elongator mutants. Tuc2 in yeast is required for the formation of the 2-thio group of the mcm⁵s²U nucleoside [15]. In a tuc2Δ strain, the formation of s² group is abolished. As expected, telomeric gene silencing was decreased in the tuc2Δ strain (Figure 7A). This strain was also sensitive to 50 mM HU nearly to the same extent as observed in Elongator mutants (Figure 2 and Figure 7B). The defects in telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response were completely suppressed by increased levels of , and (Figure 7). The phenotypes of Elongator and tuc2Δ mutants demonstrates that a translational dysfunction due to lack of U₃₄ modifications in , and causes the defects in telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response.

Sir4 expression is decreased in an elp3Δ strain

Among the three tRNA species responsible for the suppression of elp3Δ induced phenotypes, increased expression of gives the best suppression of the defect in telomeric gene silencing (Figure S1). Since decodes AAA codons, elimination of the mcm⁵ side chain from in the elp3Δ strain could influence the decoding efficiency of AAA codons. Therefore, we searched for open reading frames highly enriched in AAA codons (unpublished results). This analysis lead to the identification of SIR4, encoding a silent information regulator in yeast. Based on this observation, we hypothesized that the telomeric gene silencing defect of the elp3Δ mutant might be caused by decreased Sir4 expression. Accordingly, the Sir4 protein levels in the elp3Δ mutant were decreased to 34% of wild type (Figure 8A). The decreased Sir4 levels were restored to 80% of wild-type by increased expression of , and , and to 74% of wild-type by elevated levels of alone (Figure 8A and data not shown). We also observed that SIR4 mRNA levels were reduced to 76% of wild-type (Figure 8B), which cannot account for the decreased Sir4 protein levels. In addition, introducing the SIR4 gene on a high copy vector significantly suppressed the telomeric gene silencing defect of the elp3Δ strain, confirming that this defect seems to be caused by decreased Sir4 expression (Figure 8C). However, we do not exclude the possibility that there might be other open reading frames enriched in AAA codons whose translation is also affected and which might weaken silencing, directly or indirectly.

Discussion

Elongator complex was initially identified by its apparent association with the elongating form of RNA polymerase II, implicating a role in PolII transcription [1]. However, its requirement in transcription was controversial based on its cytoplasmic localization and failure to detect this complex on actively transcribed genes [8], [29]–[30]. We discovered that Elongator complex was required for formation of mcm⁵ and ncm⁵ side chains at wobble uridines of tRNA [10]. The participation of Elongator complex in PolII transcription and exocytosis was indirect as elevated expression of hypomodified and could suppress previously reported phenotypes of Elongator mutants without restoring tRNA modification [15]. Recently, it was reported that Elongator complex modulates telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response by its interaction with PCNA and its requirement for histone acetylation [19]. Since the histone acetylation defect of the elp3Δ mutant could be completely suppressed by increased expression of and [15], we assumed that Elongator complex indirectly participated in telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response.

In this report, we show that the defects in telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response in Elongator mutants were also suppressed by increased expression of hypomodified , and (Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure S1). Thus, all phenotypes exhibited by Elongator mutants except the tRNA modification defect are overcome by elevated tRNA levels, indicating that the major function of this complex, at least in yeast, is in the formation of mcm⁵ and ncm⁵ side chains of wobble uridines. When , and were over-expressed in Elongator mutants, the HU sensitivity phenotype, but not the defect in telomeric gene silencing, was fully suppressed (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Since Elongator mutants affect the mcm⁵ and ncm⁵ side chain formation in 11 tRNA species, it is possible that poor translation of codons decoded by any of the other 8 hypo-modified tRNA species contributes to the defect in telomeric gene silencing, but not the HU sensitivity. In addition to the mcm side chain at position 5, U₃₄ of , and are also thiolated at position 2. If our model is correct that the phenotypes observed in Elongator mutants are a consequence of inefficient translation, strains lacking the 2-thio group in , and will have similar phenotypes as Elongator mutants. We observed that the failure to form the 2-thio group in the tuc2Δ mutant resulted in defects in telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response (Figure 7). These defects of the tuc2Δ mutant were completely suppressed by increased expression of , and . In addition, lack of the methyl ester in mcm⁵ side chain at wobble uridines in a trm9Δ strain has been linked to the defect of DNA damage response [31]. Thus, both mcm⁵ and s² side chains of mcm⁵s²U containing tRNAs are important for efficient expression of gene products required for telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response. These observations strongly suggest that Elongator complex influence these two processes by promoting efficient translation. Since increased expression of gives the best suppression of the telomeric gene silencing defect in Elongator mutants, we assumed genes encoding products important for this process are enriched in AAA codons. One such gene is SIR4. We demonstrate that Elongator mutants influence telomeric gene silencing by impairing efficient expression of SIR4. Even though we observed a slight reduction in SIR4 mRNA levels in the elp3Δ mutant, it cannot fully explain the decrease in Sir4 protein levels, and it is unclear if this reduction is caused by reduced transcription or increased decay of the poorly translated mRNA.

Recently, it was discovered that Elongator complex in C. elegans and A. thaliana is also required for formation of mcm⁵ and ncm⁵ side chains at wobble uridines of tRNA [13]–[14], indicating that this function of Elongator complex might be conserved in eukaryotes. In multicellular organisms, Elongator complex has also been linked to multiple processes including transcription, cytoplasmic kinase signaling and development [32]–[34]. Two recent articles suggested that Elongator complex was also required for α-tubulin acetylation and played a role in neurological processes in both mice and C. elegans [35]–[36]. In early developmental stages, C. elegans Elongator mutants have a decreased α-tubulin acetylation [36]. However, in adult Elongator mutant worms, normal levels of α-tubulin acetylation were observed, suggesting that Elongator complex is not absolutely required for acetylation of α-tubulin [13], [36]. Elongator mutants in C. elegans were also resistant to the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor aldicarb, indicating a reduced efficiency of synaptic exocytosis [13], [36]. However, a mutant allele of mec-12, which is completely missing α-tubulin acetylation, was not resistant to aldicarb, suggesting that the defect in synaptic exocytosis of Elongator mutants was not caused by reduced levels of α-tubulin acetylation [13]. Furthermore, mec-17 was discovered to be the α-tubulin acetylase in in Tetrahymena cells, C. elegans, zebrafish and mammalian cells, suggesting that Elongator might indirectly influence α-tubulin acetylation by modulating the expression of α-tubulin acetylase [37]. Based on these observations, it is tempting to speculate that the primary function of Elongator complex in multicellular organism is, as in yeast, in formation of wobble uridine tRNA modifications.

The Elp3 subunit in yeast has an N-terminal radical S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) domain and a C-terminal histone acetyltransferase (HAT) domain. In Methanocaldococcus jannaschii, the radical SAM domain of mjElp3 contains an iron sulfur cluster region and a region that binds SAM [38]. Cysteine residues at positions 96, 101 and 104 are critical for the FeS cluster formation in M. jannaschii [38]. When these corresponding cysteines at position 108, 118 and 121 in the yeast Elp3 were substituted with alanines, it eliminated the activity of yeast Elongator in formation of modified nucleosides at U₃₄. In vitro, SAM can bind to M. jannaschii Elp3, but the binding of SAM to Elp3 from S. cerevisiae has not been detected [38]–[39]. However, when the conserved SAM binding sites (G180R G181R) in the radical SAM domain were mutated in yeast ELP3, a defect in formation of modified nucleosides was observed (Figure 5, Table 1). This observation shows that the FeS cluster and the SAM binding regions of the radical SAM domain of Elp3 are critical for the tRNA modification reaction. Substitution of glycine at position 168 to arginine, another conserved site located in the SAM binding region, reduced the wobble uridine tRNA modification to 51% of wild type (Figure 5, Table 1). In telomeric gene silencing and HU sensitivity assays, the elp3-G168R mutant displays the same phenotypes as a wild type strain suggesting that a 49% reduction in the levels of modified nucleosides do not cause phenotypes in telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response. Two mutations in the HAT domain (Y540A and Y541A) of Elp3 did not entirely eliminate the formation of modified nucleosides at U₃₄; 2 and 6% of mcm⁵s²U was detected in each mutant (Table 1). The residual level of modified nucleosides significantly improves the decoding capacity of the SUP4 encoded suppressor tRNA compared to the unmodified tRNA in the elp3 null mutant (Figure 6). This observation explains why the elp3-Y540A and elp3-Y541A mutants had increased telomeric silencing and reduced HU sensitivity compared to the elp3Δ strain (Figure 4).

Among the elp3 mutants described in Table 1, the elp3-G168R mutant, having 51% of modified nucleoside left (Figure 5 and Table 1), has the same phenotype as a wild type strain with respect to phenotypes in telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response (Figure 4). However, this strain is resistant to killer toxin (data not shown), a phenotype tightly connected to wobble uridine tRNA modification [11]. The γ subunit of killer toxin is a tRNA endonuclease which cleaves tRNA at the anticodon region [11]. The mcm⁵ side chain at U₃₄ of tRNA is important for the substrate recognition by γ toxin. In the elp3-G168R mutant, a fraction of the U₃₄ tRNAs are missing the mcm⁵ side chain and the mutant is resistant to γ toxin (data not shown). However, the modified tRNAs in the elp3-G168R support the efficient expression of gene products required for telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response. Thus, strains with tRNAs partially modified at U₃₄ show weaker or no phenotypes compared to Elongator deficient strains.

In summary, the major function of Elongator complex in yeast is in formation of wobble uridine tRNA modifications and this function is probably conserved in eukaryotes. We suggest that when new phenotypes of Elongator mutants are discovered in yeast, an important first step is to investigate whether the phenotypes can be suppressed by over-expressing , and .

Materials and Methods

Yeast strains, media, and genetic procedures

All yeast strains used in this study are listed in Table S1. Yeast transformation, media, and genetic procedures have been described previously [40]. To generate elp null mutants in different strain backgrounds, chromosomal DNA from KanMX deleted elp mutants UMY2911 (elp1::KanMX4), UMY2913 (elp2::KanMX4), UMY2915 (elp3::KanMX4), UMY2917 (elp4::KanMX4), UMY2919 (elp5::KanMX6) and UMY2921 (elp6::KanMX4) served as templates. Primers were designed to amplify DNA fragments containing the KanMX cassette and 300–500 nt flanking sequences of each ELP gene. PCR products were transformed into either W303-1A or UMY2584, and the transformants were selected by using YEPD plates containing 200 µg/ml G418. The deletion mutants were verified by PCR. To introduce asf1::KanMX4 and rtt109::KanMX4 into W303 background, chromosomal DNAs from the corresponding mutants in the deletion collection (Open biosystems) were used as templates. Primers were designed to amplify the KanMX4 cassette and 500 nt flanking sequences. PCR products were transformed into diploid strain UMY3104 and transformants were selected on G418 containing plates. The asf1::KanMX4 and rtt109::KanMX4 strains were obtained by tetrad dissection after sporulation. To construct asf1::KanMX4 elp3::KanMX4 and rtt109::KanMX4 elp3::KanMX4, the elp3::KanMX4 strain was crossed with asf1::KanMX4 or rtt109::KanMX4 to generate the diploid and double mutants were obtained by tetrad dissection. To generate elp3::KanMX4 SIR4-13Myc-KanMX6 strain, the elp3::KanMX4 strain was crossed with SIR4-13Myc-KanMX6 strain. The diploid was sporulated and the elp3::KanMX4 SIR4-13Myc-KanMX6 strain was obtained by tetrad dissection.

A two-step gene replacement procedure was used to obtain strains with different mutant alleles of ELP3. Plasmids pABY1672 (elp3-C103A), pABY1673 (elp3-C108A), pABY1676 (elp3-C118A), pABY1677 (elp3-C121A), pABY1984 (elp3-G168R) and pABY1985 (elp3-G180R G181R) were digested with EcoRI and the linearized fragments were transformed into the UMY2894. Transformants were selected on SC-Ura plates and streaked on YEPD plates. Eight independent colonies on YEPD plates were picked and streaked on 5-FOA containing plates. The strains with elp3 mutant alleles except for elp3-C103A were identified by their resistance to killer toxin and confirmed by sequencing. In order to identify the elp3-C103A mutant, DNA isolated from several candidates were sequenced.

Plasmid constructions

Plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S2. The pRS306-ELP3 (pABY1554) was constructed previously [10] and used as DNA template for mutagenesis. Plasmids pABY1672 (elp3-C103A), pABY1673 (elp3-C108A), pABY1676 (elp3-C118A), pABY1677 (elp3-C121A), pABY1984 (elp3-G168R) and pABY1985 (elp3-G180R G181R) were generated by using Quickchange Lightning Multi Site-Directed mutagenesis kit according to the instruction manual (Agilent Technologies). Site-specific primers were designed by Agilent online service. To move mutant alleles of ELP3 to pRS315, pRS306-elp3 derivatives were digested using restriction enzymes BamHI and XhoI, and the excised fragments were cloned into the corresponding sites of pRS315. To generate pRS424-SIR4, SIR4 gene was amplified by PCR using W303-1A genomic DNA as template with oligos AAAA GAATTC TGTGA GTACATATAT CCGCAG and AAAA CTCGAG TTG GTATTTGATG GGTTGCTC. The PCR product was digested with EcoRI and XhoI, and cloned to the corresponding sites on pRS424.

tRNA isolation and HPLC analysis

Cells were grown at 30°C in 100 ml YEPD and harvested at OD600 = 1.5∼2. The cell pellet was resuspended in 3 ml 0.9% NaCl. The cell suspension was vortexed at room temperature for 30 minutes in the presence of 8 ml water-saturated phenol and vortexed for another 15 minutes after adding 0.4 ml chloroform. Centrifugation was carried out at 12000 g for 20 minutes. The water phase was collected and re-extracted with phenol. The final water phase was collected, mixed with 2.5 volume 99.5% ethanol and kept at −20°C for at least 3 hours. Total RNA was pelleted at 12000 g for 20 minutes. The RNA pellet was dissolved in 5 ml DE52 binding buffer (0.1 M Tris.HCl pH 7.4 and 0.1 M NaCl) and loaded onto the DE52 cellulose column. The column was washed twice with 7 ml DE52 binding buffer and the tRNA was eluted with 7 ml elution buffer (0.1 M Tris.HCl pH 7.4 and 1 M NaCl). The tRNA was precipitated with 0.7 volume of isopropanol at −20°C for at least 3 hours and pelleted by centrifugation at 12000 g for 20 minutes. The pellet was washed once with 70% ethanol and dissolved in 50 µl MQ. Purified tRNA was digested with Nuclease P1 for 16 hrs at 37°C and treated with bacterial alkaline phosphatase for 2 hours at 37°C. The hydrolysate was analyzed by high pressure liquid chromatography with a Develosil C-30 reverse-phase column as described [41].

Telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response assays

To investigate the defect in telomeric gene silencing of Elongator mutants, 10-fold dilutions of freshly cultivated yeast cells were spotted on 5-FOA containing plates and control plates. Plates were incubated at 30°C for 2 days. To analyze the DNA damage response, 10 fold dilutions of freshly cultivated yeast cells were spotted on the plates containing 50 mM HU and control plates. The results were scored after 2 days of incubation at 30°C.

Dual-luciferase reporter assay

The luciferase activities were measured by GloMax 20/20 luminometer (Promega) and the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega). Cells were grown to 0.5 OD₆₀₀ and diluted 10 fold before use. 20 µl of diluted cell culture was mixed with 100 µl passive lysis buffer, vortexed for 12 seconds and 20 µl of cell lysate was used to determine the luciferase activity. Each culture was measured 3 times and 3 independent experiments were performed.

Western and Northern blotting

To determine the Sir4 protein levels, cells were grown at 30°C to OD₆₀₀ = 0.5 before harvest. Cells were broken in breaking buffer (40 mM Hepes pH 7.3, 50 mM NH₄Ac, 10 mM MgCl₂ and 1 mM DTT) containing Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Tablets (Roche Applied Science) by using FastPrep-24 homogenizer (MP biomedicals). 60 µg proteins were loaded in each lane. Mouse anti-Myc antibody (9E10) with a dilution 1∶1000 was used to detect recombinant proteins. The actin levels, used as an internal control, were detected using mouse anti-Act1 antibody (Thermo Scientific) at a 1∶2000 dilution. RNA levels were determined as previously described [42].

Supporting Information

Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Attachment 3

Attachment 4

Attachment 5