#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Chronic pain diagnosis in refugee torture survivors: A prospective, blinded diagnostic accuracy study


Autoři: Gunisha Kaur aff001;  Roniel Weinberg aff001;  Andrew Robert Milewski aff001;  Samantha Huynh aff001;  Elizabeth Mauer aff002;  Hugh Carroll Hemmings, Jr. aff001;  Kane Owen Pryor aff001
Působiště autorů: Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America aff001;  Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: Chronic pain diagnosis in refugee torture survivors: A prospective, blinded diagnostic accuracy study. PLoS Med 17(6): e1003108. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003108
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003108

Souhrn

Background

An estimated 87% of torture survivors experience chronic pain such as brachial plexopathy from upper extremity suspension or lumbosacral plexus injury from leg hyperextension. However, a vast majority of pain is undetected by evaluators due to a lack of diagnostic tools and confounding psychiatric illness. This diagnostic gap results in exclusive psychological treatment rather than multimodal therapies, substantially limiting rehabilitation. We hypothesized that the United Nations Istanbul Protocol (UNIP) would have a sensitivity of approximately 15% for pain detection, and that the use of a validated pain screen would improve its sensitivity by at least 29%, as compared to the reference standard (pain specialist evaluation).

Methods and findings

This prospective blind-comparison-to-gold-standard study of survivors of torture, as defined by the World Medical Association, took place at Weill Cornell Medicine between February 1, 2017, and June 21, 2019. 11 women and 9 men, for a total of 20 participants, were included in the analysis. Five participants received 2 UNIP evaluations, for a total of 25 unique evaluations included in the analysis. Participants were representative of a global population, with home countries in Africa, Central America, South Asia, the Caribbean, and the Middle East. Methods of torture experienced were homogeneous, following the predictable pattern of systematic torture. Participants first received the standard evaluation protocol for torture survivors (UNIP) by a trained evaluator, and subsequently received a validated pain screen (Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form [BPISF]) followed by a noninvasive examination by a pain specialist physician (reference standard). The primary outcome was the diagnostic and treatment capability of the standard protocol (index test) versus the validated pain screen (BPISF), as compared to the reference standard. Trained evaluators performing the initial assessment with the UNIP (index test) were blinded to the study, and the pain specialist physician (reference standard) was blinded to the outcome of the initial UNIP evaluation and the BPISF; data from the initial UNIP assessment were not gathered by the principal investigator until all other study procedures were completed. Providers using only the UNIP captured pain in a maximum of 16% of evaluations, as compared to 85% of participants being diagnosed with pain by the reference standard. When employed, the validated pain screen had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 72%–100%) and a negative predictive value of 100%, as compared to a sensitivity of 24% (95% CI 8%–50%) and a negative predictive value of 19% (95% CI 5%–46%) for the index test. The difference in the sensitivity of the UNIP as compared to the BPISF was significant, with p < 0.001. No adverse events owing to participation in the study were reported by participants. Limitations of the study include small sample size, its single-site nature, and the exclusion of individuals who did not speak 1 of the 5 study languages.

Conclusions

These data indicate that a validated pain screen can supplement the current global standard assessment of torture survivors, the UNIP, to increase the accuracy of pain diagnosis.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03018782.

Klíčová slova:

Diagnostic medicine – Myalgia – Neuropathic pain – Pain sensation – Physicians – Psychometrics – Rape and sexual assault – United Nations


Zdroje

1. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Global trends: forced displacement in 2018. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees; 2019 [cited 2020 May 6]. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/5d08d7ee7.pdf.

2. Higson-Smith C. Updating the estimate of refugees resettled in the United States who have suffered torture. St. Paul (MN): Center for Victims of Torture; 2015 [cited 2020 May 6]. Available from: https://www.cvt.org/sites/default/files/SurvivorNumberMetaAnalysis_Sept2015_0.pdf.

3. Mollica RF. Surviving torture. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:5–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048141 15229300

4. Rosenfeld B, Keller AS. Evaluation of litigants pertaining to writ petition (Crl.) no. 447/95 Committee for Information and Initiative on Punjab v. State of Punjab. Pleasanton (CA): Ensaaf; 2005 [cited 2020 May 13] Available from: https://ensaaf.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/PHR-Bellevue.pdf.

5. Williams ACDC, Peña CR, Rice AS. Persistent pain in survivors of torture: a cohort study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;40(5):715–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.02.018 20678891

6. Goldfeld AE, Mollica RF, Pesavento BH, Faraone SV. The physical and psychological sequelae of torture: symptomatology and diagnosis. JAMA. 1988;259(18):2725–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1988.03720180051032 3282086

7. Modvig J, Pagaduan-Lopez J, Rodenburg J, Salud C, Cabigon R, Panelo C. Torture and trauma in postconflict East Timor. Lancet. 2000;356(9243):1763. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03218-9 11095275

8. Steel Z, Chey T, Silove D, Marnane C, Bryant RA, van Ommeren M. Association of torture and other potentially traumatic events with mental health outcomes among populations exposed to mass conflict and displacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;302:537–49. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1132 19654388

9. Williams AC, Amris K. Pain from torture. Pain. 2007;133:5–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.001 18006232

10. Jensen TS, Genefke IK, Hyldebrandt N, Pedersen H, Petersen HD, Weile B. Cerebral atrophy in young torture victims. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:1341. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198211183072112 7133074

11. Moreno A, Grodin M. Torture and its neurological sequelae. Spinal Cord. 2002;40:213–23. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101284 11987003

12. Kaur G. Chronic pain in refugee torture survivors. J Glob Health. 2017;7(2):010303. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.020303 29423174

13. Nice DS, Garland CF, Hilton SM, Baggett JC, Mitchell RE. Long-term health outcomes and medical effects of torture among US Navy prisoners of war in Vietnam. JAMA. 1996;276:375–81. doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03540050035020 8683815

14. Crosby SS. Primary care management of non-English speaking refugees who have experienced trauma: a clinical review. JAMA. 2013;310:519–28. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.8788 23925622

15. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Istanbul protocol: manual on effective investigation and documentation of torture and other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment. Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights; 2004 [cited 2020 May 6]. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/training8Rev1en.pdf.

16. Iacopino V, Ozkalipci O, Schlar C. The Istanbul Protocol: international standards for the effective investigation and documentation of torture and ill treatment. Lancet. 1999;354:1117. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)08381-6 10509518

17. Mollica RF, McInnes K, Lavelle J, Sarajlić I, Massagli MP. Disability associated with psychiatric comorbidity and health status in Bosnian refugees living in Croatia. JAMA. 1999;282(5):433. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.5.433 10442658

18. Silove D, Steel Z, Mollica RF. Detention of asylum seekers: assault on health, human rights, and social development. Lancet. 2001;357(9266):1436–7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04575-x 11356469

19. Bozorgmehr K, Razum O. Effect of restricting access to health care on health expenditures among asylum-seekers and refugees: a quasi-experimental study in Germany, 1994–2013. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0131483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131483 26201017

20. Declaration of Tokyo. JAMA. 1986;255:2800. doi: 10.1001/jama.1986.03370200102038

21. Sharp MB, Milewski AR, Lamneck C, Mckenzie K. Evaluating the impact of student-run asylum clinics in the US from 2016–2018. Health Hum Rights. 2019;21:309–23. 31885459

22. Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2004;5:133–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005 15042521

23. MD Anderson Cancer Center. The Brief Pain Inventory. Houston (TX): MD Anderson Cancer Center [cited 2020 May 6]. Available: https://www.mdanderson.org/research/departments-labs-institutes/departments-divisions/symptom-research/symptom-assessment-tools/brief-pain-inventory.html.

24. Poundja J, Fikretoglu D, Guay S, Brunet A. Validation of the French version of the Brief Pain Inventory in Canadian veterans suffering from traumatic stress. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;33:720–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.09.031 17531912

25. Serlin RC, Mendoza TR, Nakamura Y, Edwards KR, Cleeland CS. When is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function. Pain. 1995;61:277–84. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00178-h 7659438

26. Lunde I, Ortmann J. Prevalence and sequelae of sexual torture. Lancet. 1990;336:289–91. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91814-q 1973980

27. Kalt A, Hossain M, Kiss L, Zimmerman C. Asylum seekers, violence and health: a systematic review of research in high-income host countries. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:e30–42. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301136 23327250

28. Jaranson JM, Butcher J, Halcon L, Johnson DR, Robertson C, Savik K, et al. Somali and Oromo refugees: correlates of torture and trauma history. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:591–8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.4.591 15054011

29. Gallagher RM, Sandbrink F. The socioeconomic burden of pain from war. Am J Public Health. 2018:e1–5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304744 30495989

30. Moreno A, Piwowarczyk L, Grodin MA. Human rights violations and refugee health. JAMA. 2001;285:1215. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.9.1215-JMS0307-5-1 11231757

31. Bloche MG, Marks JH. Doctors and interrogators at Guantanamo Bay. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:6–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058145 15972858

32. Porter M, Haslam N. Predisplacement and postdisplacement factors associated with mental health of refugees and internally displaced persons: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005;294:602–12. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.5.602 16077055

33. Amris K, Williams AC. Managing chronic pain in survivors of torture. Pain Manag. 2015;5:5–12. doi: 10.2217/pmt.14.50 25537694

34. Kim HJ, Yu SH. Effects of complex manual therapy on PTSD, pain, function, and balance of male torture survivors with chronic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:2763–6. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.2763 26504288

35. Defrin R, Ginzburg K, Mikulincer M, Solomon Z. The long-term impact of tissue injury on pain processing and modulation: a study on ex-prisoners of war who underwent torture. Eur J Pain. 2014;18:548–58. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00394.x 24019242

36. Shrestha NM, Sharma B, van Ommeren M, Regmi S, Makaju R, Komproe I, et al. Impact of torture on refugees displaced within the developing world. JAMA. 1998;280:443–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.5.443 9701080

37. Lin EH, Carter WB, Kleinman AM. An exploration of somatization among Asian refugees and immigrants in primary care. Am J Public Health. 1985;75:1080–4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.9.1080 4025659

38. Masmas TN, Møller E, Buhmannr C, et al. Asylum seekers in Denmark: a study of health status and grade of traumatization of newly arrived asylum seekers. Torture. 2008;18(2):77–86. 19289884

39. Gellhorn A. Sounding board violations of human rights: torture and the medical profession. N Engl J Med. 1978;299:358–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197808172990710 683270

40. Rasmussen A, Crager M, Keatley E, Keller A, Rosenfeld B. Screening for torture: a narrative checklist comparing legal definitions in a torture treatment clinic. Z Psychol. 2011;219:143–9. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000061 22737654


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS Medicine


2020 Číslo 6
Nejčtenější tento týden
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autoři: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Střevní příprava před kolonoskopií
Autoři: MUDr. Klára Kmochová, Ph.D.

Závislosti moderní doby – digitální závislosti a hypnotika
Autoři: MUDr. Vladimír Kmoch

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby AML a MDS nízkého rizika
Autoři: MUDr. Natália Podstavková

Jak diagnostikovat a efektivně léčit CHOPN v roce 2024
Autoři: doc. MUDr. Vladimír Koblížek, Ph.D.

Všechny kurzy
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#