Physician Emigration from Sub-Saharan Africa to the United States: Analysis of the 2011 AMA Physician Masterfile

Summary

Background:
The large-scale emigration of physicians from sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to high-income nations is a serious development concern. Our objective was to determine current emigration trends of SSA physicians found in the physician workforce of the United States.

Methods and Findings:
We analyzed physician data from the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Health Workforce Statistics along with graduation and residency data from the 2011 American Medical Association Physician Masterfile (AMA-PM) on physicians trained or born in SSA countries who currently practice in the US. We estimated emigration proportions, year of US entry, years of practice before emigration, and length of time in the US. According to the 2011 AMA-PM, 10,819 physicians were born or trained in 28 SSA countries. Sixty-eight percent (n = 7,370) were SSA-trained, 20% (n = 2,126) were US-trained, and 12% (n = 1,323) were trained outside both SSA and the US. We estimated active physicians (age ≤70 years) to represent 96% (n = 10,377) of the total. Migration trends among SSA-trained physicians increased from 2002 to 2011 for all but one principal source country; the exception was South Africa whose physician migration to the US decreased by 8% (−156). The increase in last-decade migration was >50% in Nigeria (+1,113) and Ghana (+243), >100% in Ethiopia (+274), and >200% (+244) in Sudan. Liberia was the most affected by migration to the US with 77% (n = 175) of its estimated physicians in the 2011 AMA-PM. On average, SSA-trained physicians have been in the US for 18 years. They practiced for 6.5 years before US entry, and nearly half emigrated during the implementation years (1984–1999) of the structural adjustment programs.

Conclusion:
Physician emigration from SSA to the US is increasing for most SSA source countries. Unless far-reaching policies are implemented by the US and SSA countries, the current emigration trends will persist, and the US will remain a leading destination for SSA physicians emigrating from the continent of greatest need.

Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary

Introduction

The large-scale emigration of physicians from sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to high income countries undermines the quality and delivery of health services in the resource-constrained origin countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) has emphasized the importance of an adequate number of qualified health care personnel for the effective delivery of health services [1]–[3]. As the late former WHO Director-General LEE Jong-Wook noted, “it takes a considerable investment of time and money to train health workers,” and when the latter emigrate, “there is a loss of hope and a loss of years of investment” [4].

Since 1970, the growth in physician density has been negligible or even negative in a significant number of SSA countries (Table 1) [5]–[11]. Liberia is one of the most dramatic examples. With only 51 physicians in 2008 for a largely rural population of almost 4 million people [5], Liberia has had one of the lowest physician-to-patient ratios in the world (1.37 physician per 100,000 people). Yet, 35 y earlier in 1973, there were 132 physicians in Liberia when the population was 1.7 million people [6], a 6-fold proportionate loss of coverage. Since its independence over 160 y ago, there has been only one medical school in Liberia [7]–[9]. Moreover, the long and ruinous civil wars that wreaked havoc in Liberia in the late 1980s and early 2000 destroyed scarce human resources and physical infrastructures, triggering a major brain drain from Africa's oldest republic [12].

However, civil war does not explain the negative growth of physician density in relatively peaceful, politically stable, and steadily growing countries like Tanzania or Zambia, both of which were listed in 2011 among the world's ten fastest-growing economies by The Economist [13]. Yet, they have experienced, respectively, a 59% and 83% proportionate loss of physician coverage between the early 1970s and mid-2010s (Table 1). The extremely low physician densities in most SSA countries are exacerbated by limited medical education capacity [7],[14],[15], as well as large-scale emigration of physicians [16]–[28] in the midst of widespread communicable disease transmission and the rapid growth of non-communicable diseases [29]–[31]. Data from Clemens and Pettersson [16] suggest that Tanzania and Zambia, respectively, had 52% and 57% of their physicians living abroad between 1995 and 2001. The authors reported 1,264 physicians to be living in Tanzania in 1995 [16]. In their 2004 publication [19], Hagopian et al. reported 1,384 physicians in Tanzania for a population of nearly 38 million. If the latest WHO estimate of the Tanzanian active physician workforce (n = 300 physicians in 2006) is credible, this implies that Tanzania's health system has lost 1,084 (78.3%) active physicians in <10 y. Thus, Tanzania's physician density has effectively decreased from 4.1 physicians per 100,000 population to 0.69 physician per 100,000 population, amounting to a 5-fold loss of physician coverage in Tanzania between 1995 and 2004.

While the international migration choices of health care workers from SSA are becoming increasingly diverse, the two most prominent destinations are the United Kingdom and the United States [16]–[28]. Using the 2002 American Medical Association Physician Masterfile (AMA-PM), Hagopian et al. identified 5,334 US-based international medical graduates (IMGs) who received their medical degrees from SSA-based medical schools (hereafter SSA-IMGs). The leading countries were Nigeria, South Africa, Ghana, and Ethiopia. They further recorded 2,151 SSA-IMGs in Canada and estimated the combined figure of SSA-IMGs practicing in North America to represent over 9% of the stock of physicians available in SSA at the time [19]. Similarly, Mullan computed “The Metrics of the Physician Brain Drain” [20] by using the 2004 AMA-PM, identifying an aggregate total of 13,272 SSA-IMGs in the AMA-PM (US), the National Health Service (UK), the Southam Medical Database of the Canadian Institute for Health Information, the Canadian Post-MD Education Registry of the Association of Faculties of Medicine, and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. In this analysis, the SSA region had the highest rate of emigration, though absolute numbers of physician émigrés are higher from Asia and Latin America where there are much higher physician populations (notably from India, Pakistan, Philippines, and the Caribbean).

It is necessary to account for all SSA émigré physicians, including those educated outside SSA, to get an accurate picture of their migration profiles. The studies by Hagopian et al. [19] and Mullan [20] did not include the substantial number of African-born physicians trained internationally but now practicing in the US. This omission, typical also in other analyses [21],[22], does not permit an assessment of how many African physicians trained overseas are now unavailable to their home countries. In contrast, Western-educated physicians who practice, teach, and conduct research in medical schools across Africa are an integral part of the national physician counts reported by WHO [5], and are included in denominator data for physician emigration rates.

Clemens and Pettersson attempted to address the above limitation in their “New Data on African Health Professionals Abroad” [16]. Contrary to previous studies, which used location of medical education as a proxy for country of origin, Clemens and Pettersson identified the country of origin of medical expatriates by their place of birth. They observed that almost 65,000 African-born émigré physicians and nearly 70,000 African-born émigré professional nurses were practicing in eight Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) high-income countries and in South Africa. Interestingly, while South Africa has been losing its own physicians and nurses to wealthier OECD countries, South Africa has also served as the main destination for African physicians who migrated regionally, that is, from one SSA country to another. Excluding SSA physicians and nurses who immigrated to South Africa, there were 35,000 SSA-born physicians and 53,000 SSA-born professional nurses identified by Clemens and Pettersson in eight OECD countries, representing one-fifth of SSA-born physicians and one-tenth of SSA-born professional nurses. SSA harbors about 14% of the world's population, but has only 3% of the world's health professionals [2], of whom 17.5% had emigrated by 2005. Clemens and Pettersson's findings indicated that the UK was the destination for the largest proportion of SSA medical emigrants, representing 10% (n = 13,350) of SSA-born physicians and 4% (n = 20,372) of SSA-born nurses. They further identified 6.4% (n = 8,558) physicians and 4% (n = 19,545) nurses from the SSA region in the US [16].

Clemens and Pettersson captured larger numbers of SSA émigré health professionals than reported in previous studies using the AMA-PM data. However, their analysis conflated émigré physicians trained by origin African countries and those trained internationally. They provided no information on the percentage comprising each group. Also, the use of the 2000 US Census data suggests that almost 9 y had elapsed from the time of data collection to the time the authors published their study. Since US census data are self-reported, IMGs who did not gain admission into US residency may or may not identify as medical doctors when completing US census surveys. Indeed, a cross-section of IMGs hoping to obtain a license to practice in the US do not pass the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) certification, a requirement for IMGs' admission into US graduate medical education, the pathway through which one becomes licensed to practice medicine in the US [32]. A number of SSA-trained physicians currently living in the US are probably among these unsuccessful applicants. However, no known study has estimated their number nor examined their migration profile or encore/alternative careers in the US.

The US consistently reports significantly more African physicians than the UK when the “country of medical education” is used to define SSA physicians. For example, Mullan [20] counted 2,392 Nigerian-trained physicians in the US compared to 1,529 in the UK. Likewise, Hagopian et al. [19] reported 5,334 SSA-trained physicians in the US as opposed to 3,451 SSA-trained physicians in the UK. But when “country of birth” is used as the selection criterion, the UK has higher numbers as evidenced by Clemens and Pettersson [16]. We speculate that many African physicians may enter the UK at younger ages, often as students, and then decide to stay and practice in the UK. In contrast, African migrant physicians typically come to the US at comparatively older ages, to work or seek additional training after initial training and work in their home countries. Hence, despite the relatively larger population of SSA physicians and nurses in the UK, the transfer of medical skills from SSA to the US may be more significant than to the UK due to the increased level of education and professional experience that would-be migrants to the US possess at time of emigration.

Medical skill transfers from SSA result in remittances sent to the home countries by migrant physicians. In 2008, officially recorded remittances from all émigrés to Africa totaled US$41.1 billion, compared to US$39.4 billion of official development aid [33]. Also, a proportion of remittances unaccounted for, but believed to be significant, is sent through informal channels such as hand-delivery during short-term home visits [33]. In addition to remittances, some SSA medical migrants have reported sending medications, medical supplies, and diagnostic equipment to their home communities [34]. Nonetheless, while acknowledging the potential for remittances to support the livelihood of émigrés' relatives in origin countries, the large-scale emigration of medical professionals from poor to rich countries remains a serious drain on the health care workforce with both financial and human consequences. We state this assuming that émigré remittances are rarely invested in health care worker education, nor do they pay for physician salaries.

Mills and colleagues [35] estimated that nine SSA countries with HIV prevalence ≥5% have lost about US$2.2 billion of returns from the investment made on the medical education of their physicians who migrated to the UK, the US, Canada, and Australia. They also estimated that UK and the US have saved US$2.7 billion and US$846 million, respectively, from the services provided by these émigré physicians. The World Health Report 2006 states: “Financial loss is not the most damaging outcome, however. When a country has a fragile health system, the loss of its workforce can bring the whole system close to collapse and the consequences can be measured in lives lost. In these circumstances, the calculus of international migration shifts from brain drain or gain to ‘fatal flows’” [2].

To characterize the magnitude of the SSA physician “brain drain” to the US, we examined a cross-section of SSA émigré physicians who successfully completed or were currently completing graduate medical education and specialty certification in the US (i.e., licensed and resident physicians; a resident is a physician training in a specialty, analogous to a registrar in the UK system). We use the phrase “SSA physician” to define any medical doctor born or trained in any countries located within the SSA sub-continent. We sought a rigorous recent count of émigré physicians trained in SSA and sub-Saharan African natives trained outside SSA who are now part of the physician workforce in the US, assessing both historical patterns and recent emigration trends.

Methods

Ethical Statement

An earlier draft of this paper was part of the first author's doctoral dissertation [34]. The work was approved by the Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board. Prior to purchasing the dataset for the study, the first author also obtained approval from the American Medical Association for non-commercial use of physicians' data.

Study Data

The American Medical Association Physician Masterfile (AMA-PM) was begun in 1906 to provide comprehensive biographic data on all US-based physicians. The AMA collects demographic, academic, and professional data on all residents and licensed physicians who practice in the US, including US medical graduates (USMGs) and IMGs. The annual data collection involves the voluntary cooperation of several health-related agencies, institutions, and organizations, including US medical schools, post-graduate medical training programs, state licensing agencies, the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME), the ECFMG, and the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) [36]. Quality issues in the AMA-PM records have been documented, namely undercounting, overcounting, and inaccurate addresses [37],[38]. For instance, the conflation of mailing/domicile and office addresses in the AMA-PM has yielded spatial errors in geocoding physician locations, resulting in overestimation of physician supply in certain affluent suburban neighborhoods where physicians reside but may not practice, and underestimation of supply in some inner city locations where physicians may practice but do not live [37]. These limitations notwithstanding, the AMA data are presently the best available representation of the US physician workforce, and are accessible to external users through AMA database licensees [39].

We obtained AMA data lists for all IMGs who received their education in medical schools located in SSA and all medical graduates who were born in SSA, but trained outside Africa. The records obtained included name, sex, medical school attended and year of graduation, year of birth, birth country, professional address, telephone number, primary specialty, residency program attended, and date of residency completion. The AMA does not collect information on residency admission date. We examined all records to identify and exclude potential outliers. Such outliers included 205 IMGs from three schools with uncertain location and/or legitimate existence: Kigezi International Medical School of Kabale (KIMSOK), St. Christopher's College of Medicine (SCCOM), and St. Luke School of Medicine (SLSOM). In our AMA dataset, these three schools were listed as located in Uganda, Senegal, and Liberia respectively.

However, KIMSOK (n = 51 IMGs) was actually located in the UK although accredited in Uganda until 2005, when its accreditation was revoked by Uganda's National Council for Higher Education [40]. SCCOM (n = 153 IMGs) claimed accreditation from Senegal's government, but had locations in Dakar, Senegal, and Luton, UK [41]. Side-by-side comparison of the surnames of all SCCOM graduates in our dataset with 263 popular surnames from 12 main Senegalese ethnic groups [42] produced no surname matches between the two groups; we believe that these SCCOM graduates were US nationals who trained in the Luton-based campus in the UK [43],[44]. Despite a report of multiple international locations in Liberia, Ghana, and California for SLSOM [41], we could merely identify a webpage for the school [45], suggesting that SLSOM may be essentially an internet-based training program. In 2005, SLSOM was disowned by Liberia's government as a ghost medical school, and removed from the International Medical Education Directory (IMED) at the request of Liberian authorities [41],[46],[47]. Only three IMGs in our data subset were trained in SLSOM. Birth countries of graduates from all three medical schools were missing for all but 21 IMGs in our dataset, only two of whom were born in SSA countries. We included these two IMGs in our analysis.

Since many older physicians are likely to have retired, we excluded those physicians >70 y (n = 442) for most analyses. We also excluded the five North African countries (Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia) since they have significantly different health care burdens, higher life expectancies, and higher physician-population ratios [5]. Information on country of birth and residency completion dates was incomplete. More specifically, there were 70.2% missing birth country and 10.5% missing residency completion dates among IMGs who graduated from SSA-based medical schools. Absence of birth country data especially limits our ability to analyze the extent of emigration among SSA-born but Western/overseas-trained physicians.

Statistical Analysis

We used available data on residency completion dates to construct a proxy for year of immigration to the US by subtracting 5 y from SSA-IMGs' year of residency completion. Boulet et al. [48] analyzed trends in certification and residency training among IMGs and found that between 1995 and 2003, internal medicine, family practice, and pediatrics accounted for about 70% of IMGs specializations. Since residency training in the above primary care specializations is on average 3 y, we used 3 y as the minimum time spent in residency. We added 2 more years to the 3-y residency length in order to account for possible time spent in the US before the beginning of residency. The 2-y pre-residency length of stay in the US was estimated from primary data collected for a qualitative study of SSA-IMGs residing in the US [34].

From the comprehensive analysis of all SSA-IMGs appearing in the 2002 AMA-PM [19], we derived baseline metrics for our analysis, enabling calculation of the size of recent migration cohorts and the overall percentage increase of SSA-IMGs in the US during the last decade. We defined medical migration proportion (p) by the following formula: p = M÷(N+M) * 100, where M represents the number of SSA migrant physicians in the US, and N the stock of SSA physicians in the source country as reported by the WHO Global Health Workforce Statistics [5]. Likewise, we defined emigration percentage growth rate (r) as follows:

where M_year2011 represents the number of SSA physicians in the 2011 AMA-PM, and M_year2002 the number of SSA physicians in the 2002 AMA-PM. To estimate the length of service provided before immigration to the US among SSA-IMGs, we subtracted year of medical school graduation from the estimated year of entry in the US. Likewise, we subtracted the estimated age at entry in the US from migrant physicians' current age to estimate the length of time spent in the US. We used year of graduation as the chronological marker for the migration of SSA-born physicians trained outside SSA. We operationalized recent migrants as physicians who graduated or emigrated in 2000 or later. No SSA-IMGs from Cameroon, Tanzania, or Sudan were reported by Hagopian et al. [19], but appear in relatively significant numbers in our 2011 AMA-PM data subset. We used pre-and-post 2002 residency completion dates to estimate the emigration growth rate of Cameroonian, Tanzanian, and Sudanese émigré physicians.

To ascertain whether or not birth country information was missing completely at random, we used the Student's t-test to compare physicians with missing and complete birth country data on three variables: age, graduation age, and graduation year. We also used a series of scatter plots to highlight the linear relationship between the numerical distributions of variables among the main subgroups of migrant physicians identified in our analysis. We visualized temporal trends in physician graduation and emigration using histograms and smoothed lines. We used both Excel and the statistical package of social sciences (SPSS) to analyze the data.

Results

In the 2011 AMA-PM, 17,376 physicians were born or trained in Africa (Table 2). Physicians who were trained or born in the SSA subcontinent represent 62% (n = 10,819) of the total, with the remainder from North Africa (n = 6,557). Of the 10,819 SSA-origin physicians, 68% (n = 7,370) were trained in medical schools located in SSA (SSA-IMGs), 19.7% (n = 2,126) in US-based medical schools (SSA-USMGs), and 12.2% (n = 1,323) in medical schools located outside the SSA region and the US (Figure 1). About 18% (n = 1,929) of these émigrés can be considered early-career physicians or recent immigrants as they graduated in 2000 or later (Figure 2). As shown in both Figures 1 and 2, the proportional representation of women has consistently increased over time and across all three subgroups (SSA-IMGs, SSA-USMGs, and other IMGs).

SSA-Trained International Medical Graduates

SSA-IMGs (n = 7,370) appearing in the 2011 AMA-PM were trained in 28 SSA countries, with over two-third coming from medical schools in Nigeria and South Africa (Figure 3). The top 12 SSA countries of medical schools featured in our analysis represented 99% of SSA-IMGs in the US physician workforce (Table 3). The number of SSA-IMGs in the 2011 AMA-PM increased by over 38% (n = 2,036) since 2002, and over 50% (n = 1,113) of this increase came from Nigerian-trained IMGs (Table 4). However, Cameroon, Sudan, Ethiopia, and Kenya had the largest percentage increases of SSA-IMGs in the US physician workforce (AMA-PM) since 2002: 350% (n = 49), 287% (n = 244), 107% (n = 274), and 86% (n = 174), respectively. The number of IMGs from South Africa decreased by 8% (n = −157). In addition, of the 240 (3.3%) SSA-IMGs age >70 y excluded from most of our analysis, 87% (n = 209) were from South Africa, reflecting the seniority and early migration history of South African IMGs. Relative to the size of the physician workforce reported in the source countries, Liberian, Ghanaian, and Ethiopian-trained IMGs experienced the largest physician losses to the US, with 52.3% (n = 59), 26.2% (n = 721), and 22.7% (n = 531) of physicians emigrating respectively. This emigration proportion is based solely on the number of SSA-IMGs found in the 2011 AMA-PM. It would likely increase if one includes the sizeable numbers of SSA-born physicians trained in the US and SSA-born physicians trained in medical schools located outside the US and outside SSA. It will certainly be much higher if one includes all SSA migrant physicians in other main destination countries (e.g., the UK, Canada, or Australia).

Demographic Characteristics of SSA-IMGs

Of the 7,130 potentially active migrant physicians (age ≤70) in our SSA-IMG data subset, 26% (n = 1,857) were women. The representation of women has consistently increased over time. From 10% in the earliest graduation cohort (1969 and earlier), women represent a little over 40% of all SSA-IMGs who graduated and emigrated during the last decade (Figures 1 and 2). As shown in Table 5, the mean year of birth of SSA-IMGs appearing in the 2011 AMA-PM is 1963 (standard deviation [SD] = 9.4), for a mean age of 50. On average, they completed medical school in 1988 (SD = 9.6) at age 25 (SD = 2.2), and then moved to the US about 6.5 y later. But, as reflected in the large standard deviations reported for each mean, these average figures vary substantially within and between source countries. With a mean age of 57 (SD = 9.4), South African SSA-IMGs are the oldest, and have been living in the US for over 26 y (SD = 10.3), the longest length of time of any groups. Sudanese migrants are the youngest (mean age = 45.1, SD = 8.0) and have been living in the US for about 13 y. Their age demographics and rapid migration are comparable to Cameroonian SSA-IMGs, the second youngest group from the nation with the fastest growing physician emigration rate.

SSA-Based Medical Schools

SSA-IMGs appearing in the 2011 AMA-PM graduated from 66 SSA medical schools, with over 70% (n = 5,098) coming from only ten medical schools. Eighteen of 25 Nigerian medical schools are represented in the 2011 AMA-PM, with seven of them figuring in the top 20 (Figure 3). These seven Nigerian medical schools accounted for ≈39% (n = 2,883) of all SSA-IMGs and ≈90% of all Nigerian IMGs practicing in the US in 2011. Five of these schools are located in Southern Nigeria (Igboland and Yorubaland), and have >100 SSA-IMGs in the US each. Émigrés from medical schools located in Northern Nigeria (Hausaland), the largest geographic region of Nigeria, are comparatively underrepresented within the US-based Nigerian physician workforce. This may be due in part to Northern Nigeria having fewer medical schools (n = 6), and thus training fewer physicians than Southern Nigeria (n = 19 medical schools) [7].

Graduates from the University of Witwatersrand and the University of Cape Town make up >87% of all South African SSA-IMGs, but South African-trained migrant physicians represent fewer than 4% (n = 54) of recent SSA-IMGs (Table 3). Recent SSA-IMGs graduated between 2000 and 2008, the last year for which graduation records appear among SSA-IMGs in the 2011 AMA-PM, and they attended 56 SSA-based medical schools. Respectively, 46.5% (n = 433), 18% (n = 166), and 9% (n = 80) of these recent graduates come from Nigerian, Ghanaian, and Sudanese institutions. As shown in Figure 3, the University of Ibadan (n = 107; Nigeria), the University of Accra (n = 90; Ghana), the University of Nigeria in Enugu (n = 82; Nigeria), the University of Kumasi (n = 76; Ghana), and the University of Lagos (n = 66; Nigeria) are the top five medical schools with the largest numbers of recent SSA-IMGs in the 2011 AMA-PM.

With 28 medical schools, Sudan has the largest number of medical schools on the African continent [7]. While the 2000–2008 Sudanese graduates account for only 24.3% (n = 80) of the total Sudanese SSA-IMGs in the 2011 AMA-PM, 244 Sudanese SSA-IMGs have actually been added to the AMA-PM since 2002. Nearly 80% (n = 258) of all Sudanese SSA-IMGs present in the 2011 AMA-PM graduated from the University of Khartoum. Post-2002 residency completions among graduates from the University of Khartoum represent 75% (n = 163) of 216 Sudanese SSA-IMGs completing residency after 2002.

Residency Institutions and Primary Specialty

Over 600 US-based residency programs provided post-graduate training to 6,517 SSA-IMGs with complete residency records in the 2011 AMA-PM. Howard University Hospital was the most popular of these residency institutions, and trained ≈5% (n = 314) of those SSA-IMGs with complete residency training information. Four of five residency programs that recruited ≥100 SSA-IMGs are located in New York City and its suburbs (Table 6). With 3,347 SSA-IMGs, the primary care specialties of internal medicine, pediatrics, and family practice represent ≈50% of all identified medical and surgical specialties (Table 7). This percentage would be higher if we included the various subspecialties within these primary specialties. While women represented less than one-third of the overall SSA-IMG population, they outnumbered men in pediatrics. Surgical specializations were uncommon among SSA-IMGs, representing <2% (n = 143) of all SSA-IMGs with identified specialties (n = 7,298).

Migration Cohorts

Available residency data on SSA-IMGs indicate that the earliest cohort of SSA-IMGs entering the US (cohort 1) was composed primarily of graduates of South African medical schools, Makerere University in Uganda, and the University of Ibadan in Nigeria. These first émigrés came to the US prior to the 1970s, when African medical schools were smaller, fewer in number, and heavily reliant on the expertise of expatriates from former colonial powers [49],[50]. The second cohort (cohort 2) reflects SSA-IMGs who emigrated in the 1970s and early 1980s, a time when most SSA countries opened at least one medical school and graduated at least the first domestic batch of MD-equivalent Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (MBChB or MBBS) graduates [8],[9]. Except in apartheid-plagued South Africa, opportunities for further medical specialization were largely unavailable to SSA-IMGs graduating in this period. Cohorts 1 and 2 are smaller than subsequent cohorts and represent 14.8% (n = 965) of SSA-IMGs with available residency information in the 2011 AMA-PM (Figure 4); physician retirements and deaths are to be expected in these older cohorts. Interestingly, South African IMGs, most of whom are white, represent 60% (n = 578) of these early SSA migrants. By and large, they were escaping apartheid [51], the legally sanctioned racist policy governing South Africa from the late 1940s to early 1990s.

The third migration cohort (cohort 3) represents 47.7% (n = 3,112) of SSA-IMGs. They came to the US between the mid-1980s and late 1990s. The surge in medical migration unfolding in the mid-1980s and sharply increasing throughout the following decade (1991–2000) coincided with the implementation of austere economic measures in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), resulting in shrinkage of the public sector in African countries, termed structural adjustment programs (SAPs) [52]–[54]. The last migration cohort (cohort 4) comprises SSA-IMGs who came to the US during the new millennium, representing 37.5% (n = 2,451) of the US-based SSA-IMGs population; 31% (n = 758) among them were still in residency or had just completed their residency training in 2011. Of note, the emigration trend line in Figure 4 has the feature of an exponential growth curve, and the drop in the number of émigrés observed between 2005 and 2011 is likely to be an artifact of incomplete residency data, given lags in entry of recent data.

Proxy for Years of Service Provided by SSA-IMGs Prior to Emigration

Figure 5 illustrates the differences between the average year of entry in the US and the average year of graduation in SSA for each 5-y graduation cohort of SSA-IMGs. The plotted differences are proxies for the average number of years of service provided to the home countries by each cohort prior to emigration; this assumes that émigrés did not spend time in a third country prior to coming to the US. The steady decline observed among graduating cohorts beginning in the mid 1980s suggests that since the onset of the SAPs, SSA-IMGs have provided fewer years of service over time to their native countries before emigrating. SSA-IMGs who graduated between 2000 and 2008 may have practiced on average for 2.4 y before leaving. This suggests that many among them may have stayed in their native countries just long enough to complete the compulsory work for full graduation/licensure (typically a 1-y housemanship/internship and 1-y national service).

SSA-IMGs with Birth Country Data

While physicians reporting to the AMA are required to report the schools where they obtained their training, the reporting of country of birth is not deemed mandatory; birth country information among SSA-trained IMGs was available for only 29.8% (n = 2,199) in the 2011 AMA-PM. Mean differences between SSA-IMGs with complete and missing birth country data were statistically significant at the 0.05 level for migrants' current age and graduation age, but not for graduation year, suggesting that an assumption that data are missing completely at random is not tenable (Tables S1 and S2). However, while we cannot confirm that the birth country data were missing completely at random, we found very high or near perfect correlations between both groups on the distribution of several variables of interest: age (R² = 0.84), graduating age (R² = 0.99), emigration age (R² = 0.97), and primary specialty choice (R² = 0.98) (Figures S1, S2, S3, S4). Thus, whatever statistical difference may exist between the two groups is not likely to affect inferences.

Of SSA-trained physicians in the US with complete birth country data, 21% (n = 467) attended medical schools outside their birth countries, and 15.6% (n = 342) were born in 34 non-African countries, led by the US, UK, India, and South Korea (Table S3). Nigeria and South Africa trained many students from other neighboring African countries who then migrated to the west, including the US. Of 752 Nigerian-trained IMGs, 26.5% (n = 199) reported a birth country other than Nigeria. Likewise, 41.5% (n = 156) of South African-trained IMGs were born outside of South Africa. This fraction is the highest for Zambia (65.2%, n = 30); the majority of Zambian-trained IMGs practicing in the US were born in India. In contrast, the vast majority of IMGs trained in Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, and Sudan are natives of those countries. Further, 24% (n = 510) of SSA-IMGs with complete birth country data are women. Of those with residency completion information (n = 1,651), over 70% (n = 1,183) immigrated to the US during the implementation years of the SAPs, and they represent 38% of all SSA-IMGs who moved to the US during that time-period (Figure 6). The trend in specialty choices among these émigrés with complete birth country data is quite similar to that of their counterparts with missing birth country data, with 49.6% (n = 1,038) specializing in primary care (internal medicine, pediatrics, and family medicine), and women outnumbering men in pediatrics (Figure 7). In sum, the 30% of physicians with complete birth country data among SSA-IMGs appear to be a fairly representative sample of the entire SSA-trained physician population in the 2011 AMA-PM.

SSA-Born US Medical Graduates

In addition to SSA-trained physicians, there are 2,126 SSA-born migrant physicians who graduated from US-based medical schools in the 2011 AMA-PM. A small number of them (n = 73, 3.4%) are older than 70 y old and may likely be retired. When excluding the latter, the average SSA-born USMG is 46.3 y old (SD = 10.5), and graduated from medical school at age 29.3 (SD = 3.9), or 4 y later than the average SSA-IMG (Table 8). This graduation age gap between the two groups is intuitively understandable given that USMGs typically complete a 4-y undergraduate degree program before admission to medical school, whereas their counterparts in SSA enter medical school directly from high school. Cameroonian-born SSA-USMGs are the youngest, with a mean age of 40.7 y (SD = 10.7), while Tanzanian-born are the oldest (mean age = 56.3, SD = 7.7). With a mean age of 42.2 y (SD = 8.6) and a mean graduation age of 28.5 y (SD = 3.4), women SSA-USMGs are 6 y younger than men (mean age = 48.8; SD = 10.7), and they graduated 1.2 y earlier than their male counterparts. Overall, women represent 36% (n = 762) of this subgroup of SSA-born physicians educated in the US. However, if the current trends persist, their number will proportionately increase as suggested by current trends and their majority status among African physician graduates between 2005 and 2010 (Figure 8).

Among SSA countries with US-based physicians ≤70 y old, Ghana, a country with 27 times fewer medical doctors than Nigeria (see e.g., Table 1), has the highest absolute number of US-trained physicians in the US (Table 8). As was the case with SSA-trained migrant physicians, most of the same leading countries appear in the top five for SSA-USMGs: Ghana (n = 398), Nigeria (n = 383), Kenya (n = 292), Ethiopia (n = 235), and South Africa (n = 174). Ghanaian and Kenyan-born USMGs represent, respectively, 27.9% (n = 216) and 21.3% (n = 162) of all SSA-USMGs who obtained their medical degrees in the US between 2000 and 2010. The number of SSA-USMGs in the AMA-PM appears to determine in part the number of SSA-trained IMGs and the number of SSA-born IMGs trained outside SSA found in the AMA-PM. The scatter plots (Figures S5, S6, S7) of the bivariate relationships between the numbers of USMGs and IMGs yielded the following determination coefficients: R² = 0.5 (for SSA-USMGs and SSA-IMGs), R² = 0.49 (for SSA-USMGs and SSA-born IMGs trained outside SSA), and R² = 0.08 (for SSA-IMGs and SSA-born IMGs trained outside SSA). While the last value is low and reflects the weak influence of both groups of IMGs on each other, the first two coefficients are quite high, and suggest a strong influence of the number of SSA-USMGs on both the number of SSA-IMGs and the number of other SSA-born IMGs trained outside SSA in the AMA-PM.

The graduation trend among SSA-USMGs (Figure 8) is strikingly similar to the emigration pattern observed among SSA-IMGs (Figure 4). Overall, the number of migrants in both groups has increased fairly consistently over time, except in the first half of 2000–2010, when one can observe a sharp decrease in the number of SSA-USMGs. After this post-September 11, 2001 (the date of the World Trade Center terrorism attack) downward trend, a surge in graduation is seen, with the greatest increase (51%, n = 255) occurring among women SSA-USMGs. The graduation trend line among SSA-USMGs also approaches an exponential growth curve. This may reflect a recent fast pace of emigration among SSA natives pursuing medical education in the US. This may equally reflect the increasing gain over time realized by the US physician workforce as the immigrant children of SSA-IMGs who are raised in the US are increasingly entering, and graduating from, US medical schools.

US-Based Medical Schools, Residency Programs, and Primary Specialties

The 2,126 SSA-USMGs identified in the 2011 AMA-PM attended 139 US-based medical schools. The ten medical schools that graduated the highest numbers of SSA-USMGs are highlighted in Figure 9. Howard University, arguably the most famous historically black college and university, is the most popular medical school among SSA-USMGs, and the only medical school to graduate >100 SSA-USMGs. Meharry Medical College is another historically black college, and it ranked second in graduation of SSA-USMGs (Figure 9). Likewise, 2068 SSA-USMGs attended >400 US residency programs, and Howard University Hospital trained the highest number (n = 51), with Harlem Hospital Center ranked second (Table 6). Fewer than one-quarter of the SSA-USMGs that Howard University trained in both its medical school (n = 28) and its residency program (n = 6) were women. Among physicians age ≤70 y, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine has trained over three times more SSA-USMG women (n = 21) in its residency program than has Howard University Hospital.

Internal medicine is the most popular specialty choice among SSA migrant physicians, including SSA-USMGs (Table 7). Among the latter, it represents 18% (n = 362 physicians) of all primary specialty choices (n>90). Among the top 20 specialties reported in Table 7, SSA-USMG women outnumber men in pediatrics (75%, n = 79), obstetrics and gynecology (50.2%, n = 104), infectious disease (66.7%, n = 20), neonatal-perinatal medicine (66.7%, n = 6), and endocrinology diabetes and metabolism (57.1%, n = 8). Of the top 20 specialties reported, emergency medicine and ophthalmology are the only two fields of specialization with more SSA-USMGs than SSA-IMGs, with respectively 102 and 50 SSA-USMGs, compared to 50 and 41 SSA-IMGs.

SSA-Born IMGs Trained outside SSA

In the 2011 AMA-PM, there are 1,323 SSA-born physicians who were trained in medical schools located outside both SSA and the US (Figure 10). When excluding the nearly 10% (n = 129) of all senior and potentially retired physicians age >70, these SSA-origin IMGs are still the oldest group (mean age = 53.1; SD = 11.1), and the most heterogeneous, having been trained in >200 medical schools located in 69 foreign countries outside the SSA subcontinent and the US. While Nigeria (n = 127) and Ghana (n = 107) still appear among the leading countries in this group, 47% (n = 560) of these IMGs were born in the Southeastern region of Africa, namely in Kenya (n = 365), Uganda (n = 113), and Tanzania (n = 82) (Table 9). Many among them are likely of Indian ancestry. A little over 31% (n = 380) of these émigrés were educated in India, 21.2% (n = 253) in the Caribbean, and 11% (n = 132) in the UK. As illustrated in Figure 11, between the mid-1970s and the late 1990s the residency completion trend among IMGs is relatively flat, while graduations decrease gradually from early 1980s to mid-2000. Starting in 2005, both graduation and residency records are on the increase with a significant surge in residency admissions and completions. This latest increase in residents may be due in part to the growing number of US-based immigrants from SSA who do not gain entrée into US medical schools, but complete their medical educations in the Caribbean. Upon completion of medical school overseas, they typically return to the US to complete their residency and practice. As revealed by Figure 12, these Caribbean-trained IMGs represent >75% of all SSA-born IMGs trained outside SSA admitted into residency in the US after 2004.

The mean graduation age (29.9 y, SD = 5.1) among IMGs in the 2000–2010 cohort is comparable to that of USMGs (29.3 y, SD = 3.9), and suggests that many of these IMGs may have completed a 4-y undergraduate program of studies, possibly in the US, before entering medical school overseas. The distribution of primary specialty choices and residency matriculations among these IMGs is consistent with SSA-IMGs and SSA-USMGs (Figures S8, S9, S10). The three most popular specialty choices in this group are internal medicine (n = 255), family practice (n = 161), and pediatrics (n = 82), with the number of women pediatricians equaling that of men. Together, these three specialties represent 42.3% (n = 498) of all IMGs age ≤70 y. These IMGs have completed their residency training in over 400 US residency programs with Howard University Hospital training the highest number (n = 22).

Discussion

We have characterized three groups of SSA émigré physicians in the 2011 AMA-PM: (1) SSA-IMGs, i.e., physicians who graduated from medical schools located in SSA (68%, n = 7,130); (2) SSA-USMGs, i.e., physicians who were born in SSA but went to medical school in the US (20%, n = 2,053); and (3) physicians who were born in SSA but graduated from foreign medical schools outside the US and SSA (12%, n = 1,194). Together, these 10,377 SSA émigrés represent <1.2% of physicians in the AMA-PM (n = 924,139, excluding inactive, retired, and semi-retired physicians), and <5% of IMGs reported in the AMA-PM (n = 248,008) [10]. However, 10,377 SSA physicians in the US is a significant brain drain for SSA; the number exceeds the total number of physicians in Ethiopia, Ghana, Liberia, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe combined (estimated at 9,560 from 2005–2010) [5]. These seven countries have significant fractions of their physicians in the US and a combined population exceeding 210 million people, equivalent to 0.05 physician for 1,000 people compared to 2.5/1,000 in the US in 2009, a 50-fold ratio [55].

Another striking example is that of Liberia. If only half of the Liberian physicians identified in the 2011 AMA-PM were to return to Liberia, their presence would more than double the Liberian physician workforce (Table 10). Likewise, if half of Ghanaian-trained physicians identified in the 2011 AMA-PM and Ghanaian-born émigrés who graduated from US medical schools were to return to Ghana, their presence would increase Ghana's physician workforce by >30%. Such hypotheticals are instructive to illustrate the magnitude of the brain drain burden, though we do not suggest that such a reverse migration would occur in the absence of improved facilities, drugs, supplies, support staff, financial conditions, and, perhaps, political reform. In some cases, IMGs returning home may face regulatory obstacles to have their US credentials recognized and obtain a license to practice [56].

A near doubling from the 5,336 SSA émigré physicians since 2002 [19] to 10,819 in 2011, using the same AMA source with its incomplete and missing data, suggests: (a) a probable underestimation of the actual number of SSA migrant physicians integrated into the US physician workforce; and (b) a serious continuing depletion of scarce human resources from SSA if current patterns were to continue. SSA has only 2% of the global physician workforce [57], yet bears 24% of the global burden of diseases including 69% of the world's HIV/AIDS infections [58]. The SSA region needs an estimated 420,000 additional physicians by 2015 in order to meet health-related targets for the millennium development goals [57]. As US medical schools awarded 29,775 medical degrees from 1978 to 2008 to Blacks/African Americans [59], we roughly estimate the population of SSA physicians age ≤70 identified in the 2011 AMA-PM to represent between 22.4% (n = 8,588 when excluding South African physicians) and 27.3% (n = 10,377 when including South African physicians) of the “black” physician workforce in the US. While we are unaware of any specific study of SSA physicians' clientele and outcomes in the US, studies of IMGs in general suggest they are more likely to practice in underserved communities than are USMGs [60]–[63]. Similarly, black physicians are more likely to practice in underserved communities than are whites [64]–[71], so one can speculate that SSA doctors are disproportionately valuable to a US health system plagued with geographic maldistributions. This may be a motivation for US institutions, notably historically black colleges and universities like Howard University and Meharry Medical College (Figure 9), or Harlem Hospital Center to recruit Africans for their medical schools and/or training programs.

Certification data reported by the ECFMG on IMGs seeking residency admission in the US suggest that only 57% of applicants succeeded in obtaining ECFMG certification between 1986 and 2005 [32]. Thus, there is a sizable but unknown number of SSA-trained physicians who may be in the US but are not practicing medicine, having not passed ECFMG certification (such SSA physicians would not be captured in the AMA-PM). Hence, even if the migration of SSA-trained physicians to the US may be interpreted as a loss from the perspective of the African countries, it cannot automatically be interpreted to be an addition to the US health care system. The failure in the destination country to practice within the profession for which they were trained implies “brain waste” for many migrant physicians according to Mattoo et al. [72]. They further find that skilled émigrés from developing countries where English is not the language of education suffer the most from “under-placement” or low transferability of skills following their entry into the US labor market. This implies that SSA physicians from non-English speaking countries (i.e., Angola, Benin, French-speaking Cameroon, DRC, Mali, Mozambique, Senegal, etc) may be at greater risk of failing ECFMG certification and experiencing brain waste upon immigrating to the US. However, this was beyond the scope of our investigation, as was any information about the skills of IMGs [73],[74], their issues of adjustment to US culture [75],[76], and the competing claims on the evolving shortage of the US physician workforce and the need for IMGs [77]–[79].

Structural Adjustment Programs and the SSA Physician Brain Drain

Our study suggests that the physician brain drain from SSA to the US began in earnest in the mid-1980s and accelerated in the 1990s during the implementation years of the SAPs. Briefly, the SAPs were a set of conditionalities for refinancing (i.e., taking new loans to service outstanding debts) imposed by international financial institutions, principally the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, to debt-burdened developing countries at the outset of the Third World debt crisis in the early 1980s [52]–[54]. Grounded in the free market ethos of the Washington Consensus [80], these macro-economic conditionalities included among other things, local currency devaluation, desubsidization of public sector services (e.g., education, transportation, public works, health), privatization of state-owned industries, and deregulation or market liberalization to facilitate the free flow of commerce and promote more competition within the private sector [81]–[86]. In Africa, this translated into deep cuts to basic public sector health care services; imposition of fees for health care provision and education; near obliteration of health research budgets; extended freezes in public sector hiring, including public education and public health sectors; unprecedented pauperization of academic and public health sector staff; increases of social inequalities and economic vulnerability; and the mushrooming of international non-governmental organizations, often with minimal accountability to the local authorities [53],[54],[81]–[85].

The human cost and socio-economic consequences of the SAPs have been discussed extensively and widely criticized on both political and moral grounds [86]–[95]. In Zimbabwe, the reductions in public spending on health care in the 1990s triggered high health worker attrition and expatriation, resulting in a 30% drop in the quality of health care provision when compared to the achievements from the post-independence period [92]. In the seminal Adjustment with a Human Face, the UNICEF office in Ghana reported that Ghana “lost more than 50 per cent of its physicians between 1981 and April 1984, and about 8.5 per cent of nurses in 1982 alone” [94].

In sum, most SAPs failed because of poverty and the inability of patients to pay, with a consequent deterioration of the public sector health system due to poor financing and loss of personnel. While the implementation of the SAPs may have ended officially in the late 1999 with the adoption by international financial institutions of a new Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper approach [95], their effects, of which large-scale skilled migration is one, have been pervasive.

Shortened Service and Heightened Emigration Trends among Recent Graduates

While migrant physicians who graduated in the 1980s and the 1990s may have left their native SSA countries in response to the low salaries and poor working conditions exacerbated by dysfunctional SAPs, emigration trends observed among SSA physicians who graduated in the new millennium reflect different dynamics. We found that earlier émigrés arrived in the US 8 y after graduation, on average, compared to 2.4 y for the later émigrés. The sharp decline in the number of years served prior to emigration reflects the increasingly fast pace of medical migration among newly graduated SSA-IMGs and foretells the challenges of stemming the medical brain drain in an era of increased globalization.

Using 1985–1994 University of Ghana graduation records, Dovlo and Nyonator [96] estimated that on average 50% of their medical graduates emigrated within 4.5 y and 75% within 9.5 y. In a 2009 study of the financial consequences of African medical migration, Clemens [97] surveyed a sample of 1,159 migrant physicians from Africa located in Canada and the US, and estimated that, on average, African-trained physicians immigrated to North America 7.2 y after receiving their medical degrees. However, the author conflated arrival data of North African IMGs with those of SSA-IMGs, thus making it difficult to determine SSA-IMGs' mean year of service prior to emigration. Nevertheless, Clemens' and Dovlo's studies further underscore the importance of the length of service by physicians in their home countries before emigration.

Our estimations suggest that, on average, SSA-IMGs graduate from medical school at age 25 and immigrate to the US at age 31.5, suggesting a potential length of service of 6.5 y prior to emigration. However, if current trends from West Africa and East Africa are sustained, it is expected that migrant physicians' mean year of graduation and mean year of emigration will continue to converge, portending an even grimmer health worker crisis in SSA in the near future. In fact, this trend of shortened service and heightened immigration is likely to be extended to other technical experts (e.g., engineers and scientists) if the arguments in the US for visa liberalization for highly educated persons are translated into law as fervently advocated in a new book [98] and in a recent testimony in front of the US House Committee Judiciary [99]. These arguments are epitomized by the US-centric views of a columnist for The New York Times: “Right now we have thousands of foreign students in America and one million engineers, scientists and other highly skilled workers here on H-1B temporary visas, which require them to return home when the visas expire. That's nuts” [100].

The view that the US should expand immigration to address its shortages of highly trained professionals and innovators is already codified in the current ease with which foreign physicians can secure visas and permanent residency if they pass ECFMG examinations and agree to provide care in a US physician-shortage area. Such initiatives as the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), a global treaty within the World Trade Organization, have viewed the service sector much as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) views merchandise trade, breaking down visa barriers (as with tariffs on goods) to smooth globalization and cross-border economic integration [101]–[103]. With continued globalization, we expect increased SSA physician emigration unless we can improve SSA physician numbers and job satisfaction substantially in their home countries. Such programs as the PEPFAR and NIH-supported Medical Education Partnership Initiative (MEPI) [14], and the smaller Consortium of New Southern African Medical Schools [104], are designed to do both and should be sustained and expanded.

However, in allocating funds to support medical education in SSA, close attention should be paid not only to medical schools with the institutional capability to manage scarce resources efficiently, but also with the commitment to serve the local community. To that end, it is critical to identify SSA-based medical schools that may have an institutional incentive to promote the emigration of their graduates. Hagopian et al. [105] observed a “culture” of medical migration in several Nigerian and Ghanaian university campuses. In these institutions, which included the University of Ibadan, a major recipient of MEPI funds and the top SSA doctor-exporting institution to the US (see Figure 3), medical faculty members did not only fail to discourage migration, they actively encouraged it, using their personal stories of emigration and return to exemplify the potential benefits of medical migration.

Given the implacability of human migration, and the fine line between immigration restrictions and potential violations of health workers' freedom of movement, “circular migration” has been recommended by the Institute of Medicine's Committee on the US Commitment to Global Health [106], and reiterated by the recent WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel [3] as a means to facilitate the temporary return of émigré physicians to their homelands without losing re-entry privileges in the medical workforce of their host countries. A similar concept advocating the extended deployment of émigré medical staff to their home countries as well as specialists from the host countries via “health exchange programs” funded by the foreign entities benefiting from émigré physicians' services has been suggested [107]. However, the high institutional cost associated with such health exchange programs may be a major disincentive. This is equally the case for the Global Health Service Partnership, launched in 2013 as a diplomacy-influenced deployment of US health care professionals in Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda [108],[109].

Effect of September 11, 2001 on the US Immigration of SSA-IMGs

Our study provides some evidence of the resiliency of medical migration against restrictive US immigration policies in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Among SSA countries with large stocks of migrant physicians in the US, only the number of South African physicians has decreased in the last decade, and there is no evidence that this decrease is associated with post-9/11 immigration restrictions. For several African countries such as Ghana, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Sudan, physician emigration rate and migrant physician stocks in the US have increased significantly in the last decade. Indeed, the steep drop of medical graduation observed among SSA natives attending medical schools in the US during the first half of 2000–2010 is offset by a swift increase in medical graduations during the second half, and both trends appear consistent with post 9/11 enrollment decreases and increases reported among foreign students attending US universities [110]–[113].

Strengths, Limitations, and Implications

Our study helps expand and update previous studies on this important and controversial issue [16],[19]–[22]. Our study sought to filter possible “outliers,” that is, potential retirees or inactive physicians, unlike these earlier studies. Our study further complements recent findings from Tankwanchi [34] who reports a critical physician age when migration is most likely among SSA-IMGs. If the number of SSA-IMGs immigrating to the US peaks between ages 28–31, that is, 3–6 y after SSA medical school graduation, and wanes at age 38, at which time >90% of SSA-IMGs have already settled in the US, then policies aimed at incentivizing SSA physicians to stay in their home countries should put a particular focus on early-career physicians age ≤38 y [34].

Our study has limitations. First, the >10,000 SSA born or trained physicians whom we identified in the 2011 AMA-PM do not represent the entire universe of SSA physicians who migrated to the US. It is reasonable to believe that a significant number of SSA physicians are present in the US, but they are employed in other occupations aside from medicine because of not qualifying for a US residency position. Thus, our emigration data are minimum estimates of the true magnitude of the physician “brain drain” from SSA to the US; if future research can include these “wasted brains” [72] in the calculation of the physician brain drain, the true burden on SSA can be better assessed. Second, we cannot fully account for physicians who are born in SSA but were trained outside Africa since only a fraction of this group actually reports their country of birth. In other words, the full size of SSA-born physicians in the US physician workforce is likely to be larger. Of course, this group includes many physicians who might have immigrated to the US as children with their parents, or came to the US to go to medical school. So, these numbers must be treated with more attention when included in the overall medical brain drain from Africa. Nevertheless, it is part of the calculus and the debate and requires further research.

Third, we cannot truly determine the mean length of stay in the US of SSA physicians as we do not have access to exit data on SSA physicians who return home. While the records from the AMA-PM are extensive enough to capture nearly all African physicians who formally practice medicine in the US, they do not inform us on the cross-section of foreign-born or foreign-trained doctors who permanently leave the US after their residency training or some years of practice in the US, but may still represent themselves in the AMA-PM. Hence, two methodological questions are worthy of future investigation: How can we accurately estimate the number of SSA émigré physicians present in the US, but not licensed to practice medicine? How can we collect exit data on SSA émigré physicians who ultimately leave the US in order to properly determine return migration rates and patterns among émigré physicians from specific SSA countries?

We believe that triangulation of physician data from diverse sources can begin to address questions that are outstanding. The ECFMG database contains demographic data on all foreign medical graduates who have attempted to establish their readiness for US graduate medical education through completion of the required ECFMG certification [48]. Despite multiple attempts, our efforts to access the ECFMG database in order to compare data on SSA physicians with those from the AMA-PM were unsuccessful. The WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Professionals [3] explicitly recommends the ongoing tracking of migrant health professional data. Thus, future investigations must overcome ECFMG reluctance to share data in order to triangulate AMA, ECFMG, and the US Census data to yield more comprehensive and accurate figures on SSA physicians in the US.

The emigration of physicians from human-capital constrained African countries to the US is the result of complexities in the labor markets for health care professionals in both the origin and destination countries. In the US and many other high income countries, rapidly aging populations and escalating medical expenses [114] are creating increased demand pressures in the labor markets of physicians that their own health systems seem unable to meet in the short term. This internal structural imbalance has resulted in the US providing generous professional incentives and favorable immigration policies to physicians (and nurses) from all over the world, luring them to emigrate. This process starts with the surfeit of primary care residency positions that are vacant due a dearth of USMGs, and continues with further career opportunities to practice in the US without visa troubles.

Despite the complexities of the international migration regimes, the movement of physicians from poor countries with limited training facilities to rich countries is a modern form of primary resource transfer and may be seen as the lower income nations subsidizing the education of higher nation physicians. International migration is increasingly likely in the face of globalized and integrated economies. Thus, policy proposals to address the inequities of global physician distribution will depend not only on credible data to influence the US and other doctor-importing high-income OECD countries to train larger number of physicians to meet their own workforce needs, but also on a social justice agenda and global health initiatives that promote the creation of opportunity structures necessary to enhance career development, improve workplace conditions, and encourage the recruitment, training, and retention of resources, talents, and skills in SSA and other LMIC source countries.

Supporting Information

Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Attachment 3

Attachment 4

Attachment 5

Attachment 6

Attachment 7

Attachment 8

Attachment 9

Attachment 10

Attachment 11

Attachment 12

Attachment 13

Attachment 14

Attachment 15

Attachment 16

Attachment 17