#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Correction: Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: A retrospective validation study


Authors: Kevin ten Haaf;  Jihyoun Jeon;  Martin C. Tammemägi;  Summer S. Han;  Chung Yin Kong;  Sylvia K Plevritis;  Eric J. Feuer;  Harry J. de Koning;  Ewout W. Steyerberg;  Rafael Meza
Published in the journal: Correction: Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: A retrospective validation study. PLoS Med 17(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003403
Category: Correction
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003403

The authors discovered a typographical error in S1 Appendix, page 2, regarding the description of one of the risk-prediction models (the Bach model) used. Some mathematical operators (+/- signs) were inadvertently reversed in the description of the 1-year lung cancer probability.

The mathematical operators associated with the "SMK" terms of the equation should have read:

+ (0.11425297 * SMK 〖- (0.000080091477 * (SMK– 27.6577))〗^3 for all values SMK>27

instead of + (0.11425297 * SMK 〖+ (0.000080091477 * (SMK– 27.6577))〗^3 for all values SMK>27

,

+(0.00017069483* (SMK– 40)^3) for all values SMK>40

instead of–(0.00017069483* (SMK– 40)^3) for all values SMK>40

,

-(0.000090603358* (SMK-50.910335)^3) for all values SMK>50

instead of +(0.000090603358* (SMK-50.910335)^3) for all values SMK>50

While the operators associated with the "Age"terms of the equation should have read:

+ (0.070322812 * AGE〖 - (0.00009382122* (AGE– 53.459001))〗^3 for all values AGE>53

instead of + (0.070322812 * AGE〖 + (0.00009382122* (AGE– 53.459001))〗^3 for all values AGE>53

+(0.00018282661* (AGE– 61.954825)^3) for all values AGE>61

instead of–(0.00018282661* (AGE– 61.954825)^3) for all values AGE>61

-(0.000089005389* (AGE– 70.910335)^3) for all values AGE>70

instead of +(0.000089005389* (AGE– 70.910335)^3) for all values AGE>70

The typographical error was only present in the supplementary description, the equations were correctly specified in the code of the Bach model that was applied for the analyses demonstrated throughout the main paper and the supplementary material. Please see the corrected version of S1 Appendix.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix [docx]
Lung cancer risk prediction model descriptions.


Zdroje

1. ten Haaf K, Jeon J, Tammemägi MC, Han SS, Kong CY, Plevritis SK, et al. (2017) Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: A retrospective validation study. PLoS Med 14(4): e1002277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002277 28376113


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS Medicine


2020 Číslo 9
Nejčtenější tento týden
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

Důležitost adherence při depresivním onemocnění
nový kurz
Autoři: MUDr. Eliška Bartečková, Ph.D.

Koncepce osteologické péče pro gynekology a praktické lékaře
Autoři: MUDr. František Šenk

Sekvenční léčba schizofrenie
Autoři: MUDr. Jana Hořínková, Ph.D.

Hypertenze a hypercholesterolémie – synergický efekt léčby
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Hana Rosolová, DrSc.

Multidisciplinární zkušenosti u pacientů s diabetem
Autoři: Prof. MUDr. Martin Haluzík, DrSc., prof. MUDr. Vojtěch Melenovský, CSc., prof. MUDr. Vladimír Tesař, DrSc.

Všechny kurzy
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#