#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Precision medicine in cats—The right biomedical model may not be the mouse!


Authors: Leslie A. Lyons aff001
Authors place of work: Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America aff001
Published in the journal: Precision medicine in cats—The right biomedical model may not be the mouse!. PLoS Genet 16(12): e1009177. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009177
Category: Perspective
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009177

On the best of days, using state-of-the-art genetic approaches involving whole genome and whole exome sequencing (WGS/WES), geneticist have only approximately a 50:50 chance of rapidly identifying variants causal for health and developmental abnormalities in humans [1]. Variants of unknown significance (VUS) now plaque WGS/WES studies, and a plethora of bioinformatic approaches have been developed to predict VUS pathogenicity [2]. One common approach to define the function of a VUS is to create the animal model, hence produce a genetically modified organism focused on the VUS of interest. For mammalian biology, rodents are the most easily genetically modified species, with porcine models developing quickly [3,4]. Genome editing of induced pluripotent stems cells supports VUS studies by creating the “disease in a dish” [5,6]; however, information from other species, comparative genetics, remains an invaluable tool to decipher VUS physiological effects, thereby influencing their priority for investigation. The research by Graff and colleagues, “PEA15 loss of function and defective cerebral development in the domestic cat, is a strong example of when the murine model just does not rise to the challenge [7], and the value of other species models is recognized.

Based on the analysis of primary astrocyte cultures from knockout mice, phosphoprotein expressed in astrocytes-15 (Pea15) has been known for decades to be expressed in astrocytes and normally functions to suppress tumor necrosis factor alpha (Tnfα)-induced apoptosis in these cells [8]. However, mice with Pea15-targeted mutations have normal brain size and morphology, contrary to a newly defined neurological model in domestic cats [7,9]. Thus, PEA15 was not strongly implicated in brain development. The Graff and colleagues study is an outstanding example of the continued importance of spontaneous conditions in large animal models, specifically the domestic cat. Hundreds of companion animals have been identified with DNA variants in genes that also cause similar human diseases (Table 1) [10]. Recent WGS studies in domestic cats have implicated causal variants in novel genes, including KIF3B variants causing retinal degeneration (OMIA 002267-9685), UGDH causing disproportionate dwarfism (OMIA 000187-9685), and GDF7 associated with another brain dysmorphology (OMIA 000478-9685), all diseases with undiagnosed human patients [1113]. New models for neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (OMIA 001962-9685; OMIA 001443-9685) have further utilized WGS and now WES in domestic cats [14,15]. Intergenic structural variation (SV) and genome organization variation are becoming more recognized as keys to gene function. The importance of SVs in the cat is demonstrated by common hypomelanistic and amelaninistic phenotypes. White cats are one of the historical models for neurological studies, as a high percentage of all white cats have congenital deafness. White is a dominant trait in domestic cats caused by an approximately 700-bp insertion in intron 1 of KIT, which is a gene known to cause various white spotting phenotypes in different species and known in the development and migration of melanocytes from the neural crest [16,17]. Interestingly, a larger insertion of approximately 7 kb at the same intronic position causes a phenotype with a lesser degree of white, the phenotype known as Spotting. A large 20-kb duplication of the lysosomal traffic enzyme (LYST) is another SV in cats, causing yet another lysosomal storage disease associated with neurological deficits [18]. The increased vigilance of feline health by cat owners and the maturation of genetic resources are supporting the reemergence of cats as biomedical models, particularly for neurological studies.

Tab. 1. Online Mendelian inheritance in animals: Biomedical models for human disease in non-rodent mammals.
Online Mendelian inheritance in animals: Biomedical models for human disease in non-rodent mammals.

Historically, the cat has been a favored model for neurological studies. Since rodents lack gyri and sulci, abnormalities in cerebral cortical proliferation and folding are challenging to study in laboratory mice. Lysosomal storages diseases often lead to neurological deficits, in which cats are highly valued models and are used in therapeutic trials [19]. In Graff and colleagues, ironically, cats with an autosomal recessive cerebral dysgenesis phenotype were identified within an Auburn cat colony established for lysosomal disease investigations. The affected cats had a 45% decrease in overall brain weight, defective gyrification, expansion of astrocytes, and a loss of mature oligodendrocytes and white matter; however, their gross appearance and behavior are not significantly abnormal. Thus, the cat is the right biomedical model for the right disease, suggesting an underlying pathophysiology and a developmental process that is unique to animals with gyrencephalic brains.

The Graff and colleagues research also demonstrates the maturity of WGS in domestic cats and the utility of the cat variant database [20]. The 99 Lives Cat Genome Sequencing Consortium now encompasses the genetic variation from over 300 domestic cats, and its use for precision medicine is maturing [20]. In the cerebral dysgenesis study, WGS of eight affected and six obligate carrier cats identified an area enriched for candidate variants in a distal 5-Mb region on cat chromosome F1q. Genotype by sequencing reduced the region to a 1.3-Mb haplotype with 337 variants that were private and not present in the 99 Lives dataset. The PEA15 coding sequence variant (XM_023247767.1:c.176delA, XP_023103535.1:p.(Asn59fs)) had the highest Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) score, predicted a frameshift and early truncation likely leading to nonsense-mediated decay, and the gene is highly expressed in the brain. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and immunohistochemical analysis revealed astrocytosis. Expression levels of PEA15 as assessed by RNA-seq from the cerebral cortex of adult cats revealed a 59% reduction in homozygous affected animals, consistent with nonsense-mediated decay. Western blot analysis with a polyclonal antibody against the carboxyl-terminal amino acids of human PEA15 indicated that a 15-kDa band present in normal brain extracts was absent in brains from affected cats. Together, these studies strongly implicate the PEA15 variant as causal for the autosomal recessive cerebral dysgenesis, causing the death of neurons accompanied by increased proliferation of astrocytes, leading to abnormal organization of neuronal layers and loss of white matter.

A vast majority of the genes in the human body have direct homologs in all mammals, including domestic cats [21]. PEA15 is highly conserved across mammalian species; however, no gene-specific pathogenic variants are defined that are associated with brain malformations. Compared to humans, cats have higher sequence identity across their exome and higher protein homology than mice, suggesting many antibodies developed for human protein studies may be suitable for use in the cat, as demonstrated by the PEA15 Western blot analyses in the cerebral dysgenesis study. Since cats have high genetic similarity and conserved genomic organization with humans, when physiological and developmental biology are also conserved, perhaps they can better decipher VUS for human studies than more traditional mammalian disease models.

How can researchers be more efficient in developing the right biomedical model for the right disease? Similarities and differences across species will define the biological effects due to perturbations in gene order, distance between genes, and the role of distant regulatory elements. Overall, genomic organization similarities and differences have not been strongly considered as important factors for biomedical models, perhaps it’s time to reconsider gene synteny across species when exploring SV and gene regulation? Assisted reproduction is well developed in the domestic cat and has been used to resurrect neurological disease models [18]. More focus and support for genome editing in cats will help produce cat models when rodents and porcine are not appropriate. Different animal models have various costs and benefits; the advances in WGS/WES in companion animals will lead to additional novel discoveries useful as biomedical models for human diseases. Additional support for cat genomics and genome editing could lead to effective, feline-based biomedical models that fill an important void for VUS interpretation, targeted therapeutics, and translation medicine.


Zdroje

1. Kingsmore SF, Cakici JA, Clark MM, Gaughran M, Feddock M, Batalov S, et al. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Analytic and Diagnostic Performance of Singleton and Trio, Rapid Genome and Exome Sequencing in Ill Infants. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105(4):719–733. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.08.009 31564432

2. Ranganathan Ganakammal S, Alexov E. An Ensemble Approach to Predict the Pathogenicity of Synonymous Variants. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(9):E1102. doi: 10.3390/genes11091102 32967157.

3. Jacinto FV, Link W, Ferreira BI. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing: From basic research to translational medicine. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(7):3766–3778. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14916 Epub 2020 Feb 25. 32096600; PMCID: PMC7171402.

4. Lee K, Farrell K, Uh K. Application of genome-editing systems to enhance available pig resources for agriculture and biomedicine. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2019;32(2):40–49. doi: 10.1071/RD19273 32188556.

5. Ma N, Zhang JZ, Itzhaki I, Zhang SL, Chen H, Haddad F, et al. Determining the Pathogenicity of a Genomic Variant of Uncertain Significance Using CRISPR/Cas9 and Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Circulation. 138;23(2018):2666–2681. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032273 29914921

6. Hendriks WT, Warren CR, Cowan CA. Genome editing in human pluripotent stem cells: approaches, pitfalls, and solutions. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.12.002 26748756

7. Graff EC, Cochran JN, Kaelin CB, Day K, Gray-Edwards HL, Watanabe R, et al. PEA15 loss of function and defective cerebral development in the domestic cat. PLoS Genet. 2020.

8. Renault F, Formstecher E, Callebaut I, Junier M-P, Chneiweiss H. The multifunctional protein PEA-15 is involved in the control of apoptosis and cell cycle in astrocytes. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;66(8):1581–8. Epub 2003 Oct 14. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(03)00514-8 14555237.

9. Kitsberg D, Formstecher E, Fauquet M, Kubes M, Cordier J, Canton B, et al. Knock-out of the neural death effector domain protein PEA-15 demonstrates that its expression protects astrocytes from TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis. J Neurosci. 1999;19:8244–8251. 10493725

10. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals, OMIA. Sydney School of Veterinary Science. [cited 2020 Sep 4]. Available from: https://www.omia.org/.

11. Cogné B, Latypova X, Dona L, Senaratne S, Martin L, Koboldt DC, et al. Mutations in the Kinesin-2 Motor KIF3B Cause an Autosomal-Dominant Ciliopathy. Am J Hum Genet. 2020;106(6):893–904. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.04.005 Epub 2020 May 7. 32386558; PMCID: PMC7273529.

12. Buckley RM, Davis BW, Brashear WA, FHG F, Kuroki K, Graves T, et al. A new domestic cat genome assembly based on long sequence reads empowers feline genomic medicine and identifies a novel gene for dwarfism. PLoS Genet. 2020;16(10):e1008926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008926 33090996

13. Yu Y, Creighton EK, Buckley RM, Lyons LA, 99 Lives Consortium. A Deletion in GDF7 is Associated with a Heritable Forebrain Commissural Malformation Concurrent with Ventriculomegaly and Interhemispheric Cysts in Cats. Genes. 2020;11(6):672. doi: 10.3390/genes11060672 32575532; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7349246.

14. Guevar J, Hug P, Giebels F, Durand A, Jagannathan V, Leeb T. A major facilitator superfamily domain 8 frameshift variant in a cat with suspected neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. J Vet Intern Med. 2020;34(1):289–293. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15663 Epub 2019 Dec 20. 31860737; PMCID: PMC6979099.

15. Katz ML, Buckley RM, Biegen V, O’Brien DP, Johnson GC, Warren WC, et al. Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis in a Domestic Cat Associated with a DNA Sequence Variant That Creates a Premature Stop Codon in CLN6. G3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(8):2741–2751. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401407 32518081; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7407459.

16. David VA, David VA, Menotti-Raymond M, Wallace AC, Roelke M, Kehler J, et al. Endogenous retrovirus insertion in the KIT oncogene determines white and white spotting in domestic cats. G3 (Bethesda). 2014;4(10):1881–1891. doi: 10.1534/g3.114.013425 25085922; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4199695.

17. Frischknecht M, Jagannathan V, Leeb T. Whole genome sequencing confirms KIT insertions in a white cat. Anim Genet. 2015;46(1):98. doi: 10.1111/age.12246 Epub 2014 Dec 16. 25515300.

18. Buckley RM, Grahn RA, Gandolfi B, Herrick JR, Kittleson MD, Bateman HL, et al. Assisted reproduction mediated resurrection of a feline model for Chediak-Higashi syndrome caused by a large duplication in LYST. Sci Rep. 2020;10:64. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56896-9 31919397; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6952417.

19. Gurda BL, Vite CH. Large animal models contribute to the development of therapies for central and peripheral nervous system dysfunction in patients with lysosomal storage diseases. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(R1):R119–R131. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddz127 31384936.

20. Buckley RM, Lyons LA. Precision/Genomic Medicine for Domestic Cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2020;50(5):983–990. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2020.05.005 Epub 2020 Jul 8. 32653264.

21. Montague MJ, Li G, Gandolfi B, Khan R, Aken BL, Searle SMJ, et al. Comparative analysis of the domestic cat genome reveals genetic signatures underlying feline biology and domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(48):17230–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1410083111 Epub 2014 Nov 10. 25385592; PMCID: PMC4260561.


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2020 Číslo 12
Nejčtenější tento týden
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

Důležitost adherence při depresivním onemocnění
nový kurz
Autoři: MUDr. Eliška Bartečková, Ph.D.

Koncepce osteologické péče pro gynekology a praktické lékaře
Autoři: MUDr. František Šenk

Sekvenční léčba schizofrenie
Autoři: MUDr. Jana Hořínková, Ph.D.

Hypertenze a hypercholesterolémie – synergický efekt léčby
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Hana Rosolová, DrSc.

Multidisciplinární zkušenosti u pacientů s diabetem
Autoři: Prof. MUDr. Martin Haluzík, DrSc., prof. MUDr. Vojtěch Melenovský, CSc., prof. MUDr. Vladimír Tesař, DrSc.

Všechny kurzy
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#