Loss of endocytosis-associated RabGEF1 causes aberrant morphogenesis and altered autophagy in photoreceptors leading to retinal degeneration
Authors:
Passley Hargrove-Grimes aff001; Anupam K. Mondal aff001; Jessica Gumerson aff001; Jacob Nellissery aff001; Angel M. Aponte aff003; Linn Gieser aff001; Haohua Qian aff004; Robert N. Fariss aff005; Juan S. Bonifacino aff006; Tiansen Li aff001; Anand Swaroop aff001
Authors place of work:
Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration & Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
aff001; Institute of Biomedical Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
aff002; Proteomics Core, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
aff003; Visual Function Core, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
aff004; Biological Imaging Core, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
aff005; Neurosciences and Cellular and Structural Biology Division, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
aff006
Published in the journal:
Loss of endocytosis-associated RabGEF1 causes aberrant morphogenesis and altered autophagy in photoreceptors leading to retinal degeneration. PLoS Genet 16(12): e1009259. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009259
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009259
Summary
Rab-GTPases and associated effectors mediate cargo transport through the endomembrane system of eukaryotic cells, regulating key processes such as membrane turnover, signal transduction, protein recycling and degradation. Using developmental transcriptome data, we identified Rabgef1 (encoding the protein RabGEF1 or Rabex-5) as the only gene associated with Rab GTPases that exhibited strong concordance with retinal photoreceptor differentiation. Loss of Rabgef1 in mice (Rabgef1-/-) resulted in defects specifically of photoreceptor morphology and almost complete loss of both rod and cone function as early as eye opening; however, aberrant outer segment formation could only partly account for visual function deficits. RabGEF1 protein in retinal photoreceptors interacts with Rabaptin-5, and RabGEF1 absence leads to reduction of early endosomes consistent with studies in other mammalian cells and tissues. Electron microscopy analyses reveal abnormal accumulation of macromolecular aggregates in autophagosome-like vacuoles and enhanced immunostaining for LC3A/B and p62 in Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors, consistent with compromised autophagy. Transcriptome analysis of the developing Rabgef1-/- retina reveals altered expression of 2469 genes related to multiple pathways including phototransduction, mitochondria, oxidative stress and endocytosis, suggesting an early trajectory of photoreceptor cell death. Our results implicate an essential role of the RabGEF1-modulated endocytic and autophagic pathways in photoreceptor differentiation and homeostasis. We propose that RabGEF1 and associated components are potential candidates for syndromic traits that include a retinopathy phenotype.
Keywords:
Autophagic cell death – Endocytosis – Eyes – Immunostaining – Photoreceptors – Phototransduction – Retina – Vision
Introduction
Despite extensive phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity, functional defects and/or death of photoreceptors are the primary cause of vision impairment in retinal and macular degenerative diseases [1–3] (https://sph.uth.edu/retnet/). The retinal photoreceptors, rods and cones, are highly metabolically active sensory neurons that are responsible for dim and daylight vision, respectively. Rod and cone photoreceptors initiate vision by photon capture in morphologically distinct modified primary cilia (called outer segments) containing stacks of membranous discs with embedded opsin visual pigment(s) and transmit visual information to inner retina neurons through ribbon synapses [4,5]. Differentiation of these structurally and functionally unique cells in the developing mammalian retina spans a long period (3–4 weeks in mice and several months in humans) and is dictated by a select subset of transcriptional regulatory proteins [6,7]. Circadian-controlled shedding and subsequent renewal of outer segment discs are critical for functional maintenance of photoreceptors and involve extensive membrane turnover, polarized protein transport and stringent control of all facets of intracellular trafficking [8]. Not surprisingly, genetic defects affecting outer segment biogenesis and ciliary transport processes constitute almost one-third of all inherited retinal diseases [9–12].
Endocytosis is an essential evolutionarily conserved process for internalization of extracellular molecules, signal transduction and turnover of plasma membrane components, which are critical for maintaining cellular functions and homeostasis [13–16]. Distinct steps of the endocytic pathway occur in specific subcellular compartments and involve a number of small GTPases and associated proteins; of these, Rab (Ras-Related Proteins in the Brain) proteins and their effectors are implicated in almost all aspects of this intricate process [17]. Like other small monomeric GTPases of the Ras superfamily, Rabs are ubiquitously expressed binary molecular switches, cycling between an inactive GDP-bound state in the cytosol and an active GTP-bound state on vesicle membranes [17,18]. The cycle of Rab activation involves the recruitment of a wide array of effector molecules to control vesicular trafficking within the endocytic pathway including but not limited to vesicle budding, motility, tethering and fusion [19,20]. Dysfunction of Rabs or their effectors results in diverse clinical phenotypes affecting nearly all tissues and organ systems [21,22]. Mutations in two of the Rab family proteins, Rab27 and Rab28, have been associated with retinal dystrophies [23,24]. Notably, Rab28 is required for turnover of endocytosed proteins and for lysosomal delivery of protein cargo in Trypanosoma brucei [25]. However, the relationship of Rabs and their effectors to endocytosis has not been explored in the retina.
Studies in Xenopus retina provided the first direct evidence of endocytosis in vertebrate rod photoreceptors to presumably recover and recycle molecular components from the inner segment plasma membrane [26]. In later studies, synaptic vesicle endocytosis was also demonstrated in Salamander cone photoreceptors as a likely mechanism to maintain neurotransmitter release at a high physiological rate [27]. Additionally, maintenance of rhabdomeres (outer segment-like structures) in Drosophila photoreceptors reportedly requires endocytosis [28]. However, we currently have a poor understanding of the endocytic pathway and its relevance in the mammalian retina, especially, in photoreceptors.
Advances in next generation sequencing technology have permitted transcriptome profiling of different tissues and cell types even at a single cell level. Taking advantage of the published transcriptome datasets (https://neicommons.nei.nih.gov/#/analysis), we identified the endocytic regulator Rabgef1 as the only Rab-associated gene showing increasing expression during retinal development. Herein we show that the Rabgef1-/- retina exhibits little visual function at eye opening in mice, with relatively fast photoreceptor degeneration due to compromised biogenesis of outer segment discs and accumulation of autophagosome-like vesicles within the inner segment region. Based on immunostaining and retinal transcriptome analysis, we propose a likely cellular sequence of events including decreased autophagic flux that lead to photoreceptor cell death in the absence of RabGEF1. Our studies provide direct support for the centrality of RabGEF1, and consequently its target Rabs, in endocytic and/or autophagic events during functional maturation and homeostasis of retinal photoreceptors. We suggest that RabGEF1 and related components should be considered as candidates for human retinopathies and/or syndromes that include a photoreceptor degeneration phenotype.
Results
Rabgef1 expression during retinal differentiation
We examined the expression of all Rabs and related effector proteins in transcriptome datasets of developing mouse retina [29,30] from embryonic day 11 (E11) to postnatal day 28 (P28) and identified Rabgef1 as the only Rab-associated gene that showed increasing expression from P6 onwards (S1 Table). RabGEF1 functions during endocytosis as a GEF of Rab5 through formation of an obligatory and tight physical complex with Rabaptin-5 [31–33] (Fig 1A). When activated by the RabGEF1-Rabaptin5 complex, Rab5-GTP interacts with a variety of effector proteins including tethering factors such as Early Endosomal Antigen 1 (EEA1) and SNARE proteins such as Syntaxin13, leading to heterotypic fusion of clathrin-coated vesicles with early endosomes or homotypic fusion of early endosomes with each other [14,34] (Fig 1A). Activation of Rab5 by RabGEF1 promotes initial stages of the endocytic pathway, propelling cargoes along degradation or recycling routes [20]. Expression of Rabgef1 transcripts in the developing mouse retina paralleled the trajectory of rod and cone photoreceptor differentiation [35,36] (Fig 1B). In situ hybridization experiments revealed Rabgef1 mRNA in all retinal cell types, with strong expression noted within the outer nuclear layer (ONL) of photoreceptors (Fig 1C). Immunoblot analysis of mouse retinal extracts demonstrated the peak of RabGEF1 protein expression at P14 (at the time of eye opening), when photoreceptor outer segment formation and synaptogenesis are proceeding rapidly (Fig 1D and S1A Fig).
To elucidate the function of RabGEF1 in the mammalian retina, we examined Rabgef1-/- (knockout, KO) mice [37] through postnatal development and later ages. As predicted, RabGEF1 protein was undetectable in the KO retina by immunoblotting (Fig 1D) and immunohistochemistry (Fig 1E). In contrast, RabGEF1 expression was readily detectable by immunoblotting of control retinas (Rabgef1+/+, Rabgef1+/-) (Fig 1D). RabGEF1 protein was also evident in photoreceptor inner segments and synaptic terminals in the outer plexiform layer (OPL) by immunostaining of control retinas (Fig 1E), though non-specific background staining was also observed in both control and KO samples.
Loss of RabGEF1 results in photoreceptor degeneration
Histology was performed for control and Rabgef1-/- mouse retina from developing (P10) to mature stages (P45). At early stages, retinal development appeared normal in Rabgef1-/- mice and was indistinguishable from littermate controls (Fig 2A and S1B Fig). However, the retina of P21 KO mice showed signs of thinning, and specific cell loss was evident within the ONL. Rapid loss of photoreceptors continued with age, and only 1–2 rows of cells remained in the ONL by P45 (Fig 2A and S1 Fig). While rod outer segments were noticeably shorter by P21 as indicated by rhodopsin immunostaining (S2 Fig). Cones, bipolar, amacrine, horizontal and ganglion cells appeared to be largely unaffected in the KO retina at P21 based on immunostaining of cell-type specific markers (S2 Fig). Notably, S-opsin staining was dramatically reduced at P45 (S2 Fig, right panel). As predicted, immunostaining of ribeye (a marker of photoreceptor synaptic ribbons) was progressively reduced in the OPL, and GFAP reactivity (a marker of activated Müller glia) was elevated in Rabgef1-/- retina due to photoreceptor degeneration (S2 Fig).
We performed electroretinogram (ERG) recordings to test for visual function. Rabgef1-/- retina showed diminished responses to light stimuli compared to littermate controls at different ages (Fig 2B and S3 Fig). The dark-adapted (scotopic) a-waves reflecting rod photoreceptor function, and the corresponding b-waves originating from inner retina neurons, were dramatically reduced as early as P15 in the mutant retina (Fig 2B), demonstrating functional deficits in rod phototransduction and in synaptic transmission to inner retinal neurons despite apparently normal morphology (see Fig 2A). Compared to littermate controls, Rabgef1-/- retina also showed significantly reduced light-adapted (photopic) b-waves, indicating a compromised cone-mediated visual response. By P21, rod responses (scotopic) were barely detectable in KO retina, and cone responses (photopic) were greatly reduced (Fig 2C and S3 Fig). Notably, at least half of the rods remain at this age in the KO retina as indicated by ONL thickness (Fig 2A), suggesting a functional defect in rods beyond the underlying cell loss. In a number of retinal degeneration models, cell loss is accelerated by light exposure. To determine whether the decline in visual function in Rabgef1-/- mice was similarly exacerbated by light, ERGs were recorded from animals reared in the dark from birth. No significant effect of dark rearing was detected on rod or cone photoreceptor function in the KO retina (Fig 2D), and ERG traces were comparable to animals reared under standard cyclic lighting (S3 Fig). Thus, visual function decline in the Rabgef1-/- retina is independent of light exposure.
Outer segment biogenesis is compromised in the Rabgef1-/- retina
Immunohistochemical analysis of P14 Rabgef1-KO retina showed correct localization, yet reduced staining, of key outer segment proteins including rhodopsin, cyclic nucleotide gated channel α and β subunits (Cnga and Cngb) and cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase β (Pde6b) (Fig 3A), suggesting that photoreceptor dysfunction at this early stage (see Fig 2B) cannot be solely attributed to mis-trafficking of phototransduction proteins. Immunoblotting of retinal proteins corroborated the immunohistochemical data and revealed a decrease in many outer segment proteins in Rabgef1-KO samples compared to littermate controls (Fig 3B).
To determine why the Rabgef1-KO retina exhibits a dramatically reduced visual response at early developmental timepoints despite correct localization of phototransduction proteins, we performed ultrastructural analysis by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Around the time of eye opening (P14), we noted fewer, stunted and disorganized outer segments in the Rabgef1-/- retina compared to controls (Fig 4A). Furthermore, at higher magnification, large electron-dense and amorphous aggregates contained within vacuoles with the appearance of autophagic organelles (black arrowheads) were consistently detected in the inner segments of many photoreceptors in P14 KO retinas (Fig 4B). Additional TEM analysis of Rabgef1-/- retinas revealed the presence of these aggregates in a few photoreceptors as early as P10 (S4 Fig), with progressive and rather dramatic increase in both rods and cones by retinal maturity around P22 (Fig 4C and S4 Fig). Overall, these results indicate that the loss of Rabgef1 specifically leads to early cellular defects in outer segment biogenesis, with concomitant accumulation of amorphous aggregates within the inner segments before photoreceptor degeneration is evident by histology.
Loss of RabGEF1 results in reduction of early endosomes
To investigate whether RabGEF1also functions in the endocytic pathway in the mammalian retina, we performed co-immunoprecipitation studies to identify its interacting proteins using P14 mouse retina extracts. As predicted, RabGEF1 was immunoprecipitated from control retinal extracts with anti-RabGEF1 antibody but not with control IgG (Fig 5A). Re-probing of the immunoblot revealed co-immunoprecipitation of Rabaptin-5 with RabGEF1, consistent with their coordinated function in endocytosis. We then performed mass spectrometry analysis of the anti-RabGEF1 and IgG-immunoprecipitated proteins from control and KO retinal lysates. Our analysis confirmed an interaction between RabGEF1 and Rabaptin-5 (also known as Rabep1) in a 2:1 stoichiometry (Fig 5B), similar to previously published data [32,33]. We also observed an interaction of RabGEF1 with the Rabaptin-5 paralog Rabep2. Neither Rabaptin-5 nor Rabep2 were detected by co-immunoprecipitation of control retina extract with rabbit IgG or from Rabgef1-/- retinal lysate with anti-RabGEF1 antibody (Fig 5B). Together, these data suggest that RabGEF1 exerts a conserved endocytic function in the mammalian retina as shown in other somatic cell types.
RabGEF1 is known to be an activator of the Rab5 subfamily. Immunoblot analysis did not show any change in expression of Rab5 in the KO retina (S5A Fig). To evaluate whether Rab5 is functional, we examined control and KO retina by immunostaining for early endosomal antigen 1 (EEA1), a direct effector of activated Rab5-GTP associated with endocytic vesicles during the process of fusion [38]. Interestingly, EEA1+ puncta were present throughout photoreceptor inner segments (white arrows) and in OPL (Fig 5C and S5B Fig) of developing control and Rabgef1-/- retina (P10, P12, P14). However, much less EEA1 immunoreactivity (representing reduced membrane association or fewer endocytic vesicles) was detected in the photoreceptor inner segments of KO retina compared to controls. Quantification revealed a significant reduction in the number of EEA1+ vesicles in Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors compared to littermate controls (Fig 5D and S5B Fig). This reduction in EEA1-positive endosomes is likely not due to reduced expression of the EEA1 protein, as immmunoblotting detected similar levels in control and KO retina extracts (Fig 5E). These results suggest a significant loss of EEA1+ early endocytic vesicles, probably causing perturbation of endocytic fusion in the Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors.
Autophagy is altered in Rabgef1-KO photoreceptors
The endocytic machinery in general [16] and RabGEF1 and Rab5 in particular [39,40] play important roles in modulating autophagy. A reduction in early endosomes and existence of vacuoles with electron-dense aggregates in KO photoreceptors suggested autophagy alterations in the absence of RabGEF1. We therefore performed immunohistochemical staining of P10 to P21 control and KO retinas using an antibody to the autophagy marker, microtubule light-chain 3, isoforms A and B (LC3A/B). We observed the presence of LC3A/B-positive autophagosomes specifically in the photoreceptor layer of the KO retina (white arrows) as early as P12, with progressive increase and wider distribution throughout the cell at later stages (Fig 6A). Lower magnification images of LC3A/B staining revealed that autophagosomes in KO retina were restricted to a subset of photoreceptors (ONL and IS layers) and were undetectable in other retinal cell types (Fig 6B). Immunoblot analysis of retinal lysates also indicated an increase in the lipidated, membrane-bound LC3A/B-II form in the Rabgef1-/- retina (Fig 6C). LC3A/B+ autophagosome structures were not observed in control retina at any developmental stage examined. Moreover, accumulation of LC3A/B+ autophagosomes and/or electron dense structures were not detected in other mouse models of retinal degeneration including the Rhodopsin T17M, Rd1, and Rds mutants (S5C and S5D Fig), suggesting a specific autophagic alteration in Rabgef1-KO retina unrelated to other mechanisms of photoreceptor cell death.
Immunostaining for the autophagy cargo adapter marker p62 (also known as SQSTM1) demonstrated a similar pattern with positive labeling restricted to the photoreceptor layer of KO retina (Fig 6D). High-resolution imaging of p62 staining using the Zeiss LSM880 Airyscan microscope (Fig 6D, right panels) showed a localization pattern reminiscent of the electron-dense structures observed in TEM images (see Fig 4). To determine whether these structures were indeed autophagic vacuoles, post-embedding immunoelectron microscopy was performed with anti-p62 antibody. Indeed, we observed p62 immunogold labeling associated with electron-dense amorphous deposits in the inner segments of KO photoreceptors (Fig 6E). p62 immunostaining was not detected in photoreceptors of control retina by either confocal or electron microscopy. Immunoblot analysis of control and KO retinal protein lysates revealed no appreciable difference in p62 (Fig 6F), probably because p62 accumulation was limited to a subset of photoreceptor cells.
We then isolated vesicular fractions from control and Rabgef1-/- retinas. Mass spectrometry analysis of these fractions identified 1176 proteins in the control and 1085 in the KO, with significant differences between the two fractions (S6A Fig and S2 Table). Quantitative comparison and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis revealed the absence of or a significant decrease in many proteins associated with phototransduction (such as Gnat1/2, Pde6a, Grk1 and Sag), mitochondrial homeostasis (including Atp5l, Atp5h, Dlat, Cisd1), and synaptic transmission (e.g., Syn1, Syn2, SV2a, SV2b, Snap25) in the KO vesicle fraction (S6B and S6C Fig and S2 Table).
Transcriptome profiling identifies early changes in developing Rabgef1-/- retina
To gain insights into early cellular changes resulting from the loss of RabGEF1, we performed comparative analysis of Rabgef1-KO versus control retinal transcriptomes at three key developmental ages: P6, P10 (before degeneration is evident), and P14 (when photoreceptors show ultrastructural and visual function defects but without cell loss). Differential expression (DE) analysis identified global expression changes as a prelude to photoreceptor degeneration, with a total of 2469 significant DE genes that could be categorized to specific cellular pathways including phototransduction, mitochondria, oxidative stress and endocytosis (Fig 7A). We then performed Gene Ontology (GO), KEGG and Reactome pathway analysis of DE genes (Fig 7B). Several genes associated with phototransduction and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation showed consistently lower expression at early stages (P6 and P10) of photoreceptor differentiation in the KO retina (Fig 7C). We note that the expression of these genes increases during normal development of photoreceptors [36]. We also observed altered expression of a number of oxidative stress response genes at the three stages examined (S7 Fig). Interestingly however, autophagy-associated genes were not differentially expressed in the transcriptome analysis (S8 Fig). Nevertheless, higher expression of lysosomal and early endosomal genes in the P14 Rabgef1-KO retina (Fig 7E) indicates an adaptive response to decreased protein recycling and degradation. The transcriptomic analysis of Rabgef1-KO retina thus highlights multiple cellular and developmental processes that are impacted by the absence of RabGEF1 before photoreceptor degeneration is evident after eye opening (P14).
Discussion
Internalization of macromolecules and recycling or turnover of membrane components by endocytosis are critical for diverse cellular functions that maintain homeostasis. Rab5 and its regulators RabGEF1 and Rabaptin-5 are required for the biogenesis of early endosomes [41], which then deliver cargo macromolecules to recycling or degradation pathways [20]. In addition to promoting Rab5 activity as a GEF, RabGEF1 also binds ubiquitin [42] and its recruitment to the early endosome is controlled by ubiquitination [43]. Notably, the function of RabGEF1 has been investigated primarily in cell culture systems [32,42,44]. Only a few studies have been performed in vivo; specifically, the absence of RabGEF1 in mast cells and epidermal keratinocytes was demonstrated to contribute to skin inflammation in Rabgef1-KO mice [37,45]. Here, we implicate, for the first time, a critical function of RabGEF1 during photoreceptor maturation in the developing mammalian retina. The loss of RabGEF1 leads to severe defects in outer segment maintenance and phototransduction likely due to a decrease in protein recycling and membrane turnover caused by reduction in early endosomes marked by the Rab5-GTP effector protein EEA1. Concurrent to and/or followed by these events in developing photoreceptors, we demonstrate microscopically evident accumulation of macromolecular aggregates at P14 (eye opening) likely resulting from altered autophagy, which we propose leads to relatively fast photoreceptor cell death.
Developmentally regulated expression, concordant with photoreceptor morphogenesis [6] and significant loss of visual function in Rabgef1-/- mice as early as eye opening (P14/P15), implied a major contribution of RabGEF1 to functional maturation and survival of retinal photoreceptors. We were intrigued by the photoreceptor-specific impact of RabGEF1 loss despite the ubiquitous nature of its function in endocytosis. Photoreceptor cell death was minimal at P14 and was only becoming evident by P21. Ectopic accumulation of outer segment proteins was not detected in Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors; instead, slower biogenesis of outer segments appeared to result from reduced amount of OS bound proteins that reach their destination. Structural defects and reduced expression of phototransduction proteins can account only in part for disproportionately severe deficits in rod and cone function (both a- and b-wave) at P15 and P21. Dark rearing that slows photoreceptor degeneration in several retinal disease models (e.g., those with dominant rhodopsin mutations or with loss of the visual arrestin) did not have any impact on visual responses of Rabgef1-/- mice. Another possible contributor to visual function defects could be a decrease in endocytosis leading to perturbation of synaptic transmission from photoreceptors to bipolar neurons. Rab5 is essential for synaptic vesicle endocytosis and recycling [46]. A quantifiable and significant reduction in EEA1-positive puncta (without a change in EEA1 protein itself) representing early endosomes in Rabgef1-/-photoreceptor inner segments is consistent with decreased endocytosis upon knockdown of Rab5 isoforms [41]. The almost 3-fold decrease in several synaptic proteins in the vesicle fraction of KO retina (see S2 Table) is likely reflective of reduced endocytosis as well.
Reduced endocytosis, however, cannot satisfactorily explain the relatively fast death of photoreceptors in the absence of RabGEF1. We were intrigued by the accumulation of large amorphous electron-dense material within autophagosome-like structures observed upon ultrastructural analysis of Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors as early as eye opening in P14 retina. We wondered whether RabGEF1 loss leads to dysregulation of autophagy in photoreceptors. Both endocytosis and autophagy involve fusion of membrane vesicles to lysosomes for degradation and utilize many similar components associated with cell signaling and trafficking [47,48]; this convergence has implicated a regulatory crosstalk between these two evolutionarily conserved transport pathways that control cellular homeostasis. Rab5 directly regulates autophagosome formation in the canonical autophagy pathway [39,49]. However, its association with the autophagy marker LC3 is also implicated in endocytic removal of β-amyloid in a mouse Alzheimer’s disease model [50]. Notably, siRNA-mediated silencing of Rabgef1 is shown to result in enhanced autophagy in C. elegans [51] and the involvement of the ubiquitin-binding domain is suggested to be responsible for RabGEF1’s ability to switch back and forth between endocytic and autophagic functions [52]. Our results demonstrating enhanced LC3 immunoreactivity in Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors strongly implicate a direct role of Rab5 and RabGEF1 in maintaining normal autophagic homeostasis [53].
At present, we cannot conclude whether the autophagy phenotype of the Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors reflects increased autophagy initiation or decreased autophagy flux. A distinction between these two possibilities would require pharmacologic manipulations (e.g., bafilomycin A1 treatment) that are only feasible in cell culture systems. Increased autophagy initiation could be a response to the accumulation of internalized proteins that cannot recycle back to the plasma membrane or traffic to lysosomes via late endosomes. This interpretation would be in line with the enhanced autophagy observed upon silencing of Rabgef1 in C. elegans [51]. On the other hand, decreased autophagic flux could result from the involvement of Rab5 and RabGEF1 in autophagosome biogenesis [39,49]. The increased immunostaining of p62-positive aggregates in Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors observed in our studies would be most consistent with this latter possibility, since p62 itself is degraded by autophagy. We note that aggregates of p62 and LC3 visualized by immunofluorescence staining in the Rabgef1-/- retina were detected only in a subset of photoreceptors and that the immunoblot analysis of p62 and LC3 protein levels was performed with total retinal extracts. p62 and LC3 aggregates in Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors reflect undigested autophagosomes, and the total amount of the two proteins might not be dramatically altered in the whole retina. Further autophagic flux experiments will be required to elucidate the underlying defects in the process. In any event, we hypothesize that reduced endocytic trafficking and accumulation of membrane components in autophagic vesicles disrupts normal physiological functions leading to death of photoreceptor cells (Fig 7F). Consistent with this hypothesis, temporal transcriptomic profiling of KO retina reveals early changes in the gene expression associated with phototransduction and ciliary proteins resulting in aberrant photoreceptor maturation. We also uncovered dysregulation of genes associated with mitochondria, which could contribute to enhanced oxidative stress in photoreceptors prior to cell death. Augmented expression of endosomal and lysosomal genes is likely indicative of a photoreceptors’ compensatory response in an attempt to eliminate accumulated protein aggregates. We note that disruption of the autophagy-lysosomal pathway followed by abnormal mitochondrial turnover in rod photoreceptors has been suggested to cause early retinal degeneration in mice carrying a mutation in the Cln6 gene (Cln6nclf) [54].
In conclusion, our studies uncover a direct and critical role of RabGEF1 in the endocytic and autophagic pathways during functional maturation of mammalian photoreceptors and demonstrate that the loss of RabGEF1 leads to photoreceptor developmental defects and relatively fast retinal degeneration likely because of compromised recycling and proteostasis. We suggest that Rabgef1 and other endocytosis/autophagy-associated effector genes should be considered as candidates for syndromic diseases that include photoreceptor dysfunction or degeneration.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
All procedures involving the use of mice were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Eye Institute (ASP #650) and performed in accordance with the Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.
Animals
BALB/cJ mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Germantown, MD, USA). Rabgef1-/- mice have been described previously [37]. Rabgef1+/- males (from Dr. S. Galli, Stanford University) were crossed to wildtype BALB/cJ females to refresh the colony. We used intercrosses of heterozygous mice (KO mice were not viable on BL/6 background) after genotyping using the following: shared primer (6505) 5’- TTA GAG GAG GTT GTG AGC TGCCAT-3’; wildtype primer (6506) 5’- TGC AGC TTA CTC AGG CAT GGA AGA-3’; and mutant primer (6534) 5’-GAC GTG CTA CTT CCA TTT GTC ACG -3’. The PCR was performed as follows: Step 1. 94°C for 60 sec. Step 2. 94°C for 15 sec. Step 3. 66°C for 60 sec. Step 4. 72°C 90 sec. Repeat steps 2, 3, and 4 for 35–40 cycles, depending on concentration of starting DNA. Step 5. 72°C 10 min. Step 6. 4°C. It should be noted that the Rabgef1 PCR reaction required 0.5M Betaine (Sigma) and 3% DMSO by volume, in order to stabilize the DNA within the reaction. The mutant band is 1 kb in size, while the wildtype is 840 bp. Original founders were negative for Rd1 and Rd10 mutant alleles that are sometimes present within inbred mouse strains. Male and female mice were used equally in all experimental procedures and maintained on a normal 12 h light/dark cycle (unless otherwise noted) with unlimited access to food and water. Both heterozygous and wildtype littermates were used as controls.
Electroretinogram (ERG) recordings
The mice were dark-adapted overnight and prepared for recording under dim-red illumination. The pupils were dilated by topical administration of tropicamide (1% wt/vol, Alcon) and phenylephrine (2.5% wt/vol, Alcon). Proparacaine hydrochloride (0.5% wt/vol, Alcon) was applied for topical eye anesthesia. Mice were anesthetized with ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) by I.P. injection of 0.1 mL/10 g body weight of anesthetic solution (1 mL of 100 mg/mL ketamine and 0.1 mL of 100 mg/mL xylazine in 8.9 mL 1X PBS). Body temperature was maintained at 37°C on a heating platform. Gonioscopic Prism solution (2.5% wt/vol, Hypomellose Ophthalmic Demulcent solution, Alcon) was applied to each eye, and gold wire loop electrodes were placed on corneas, with the reference electrode placed in the mouth. Flash ERG recordings were taken simultaneously from both eyes using an Espion E2 Visual Electrophysiological System (Diagnosys). Rod and mixed rod-cone ERG responses were recorded at increasing light intensities over the range of 0.0001–10 cd‧s/m2 under dark adapted conditions. The stimulus interval between flashes varied from 5 s at the lowest stimulus strengths to 60 s at the highest ones. Two to ten responses were averaged depending on flash intensity. The mouse was then light adapted for photopic responses for 2 minutes in the Ganzfeld dome. Recordings were carried out at light intensities over 0.3–100 cd‧s/m2 under a background light that saturates rod function. Twenty to 30 responses were averaged. ERG signals were sampled at 1000 Hz and recorded with a 0.3 Hz low-frequency and 300-Hz high frequency cutoffs. The a-wave amplitude was measured from the baseline to the negative peak, and the b-wave was measured from the a-wave trough to the maximum positive peak. To compare ERG data between control and Rabgef1-/- animals at each intensity, we first averaged the ERG amplitude data for the two eyes of each mouse and then averaged the data for all mice within a single group (e.g., genotype). Statistical values were calculated using Prism Software with one two-tailed unpaired t-test performed per row. P values were computed with more power, assuming that all rows are sampled from populations with the same scatter (SD). Multiple comparisons were corrected for using the Holm-Sidak method to calculate statistical significance. * (0.033), ** (0.002), *** (<0.001).
Histology and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
For standard histology, mice were euthanized, the anterior segment was removed before fixing eyecups in 4% glutaraldehyde in 1X PBS for 30 min. Eyecups were then transferred to 4% PFA in 1X PBS until being embedded in glycol methylacrylate. Sections were cut 5-micron thick, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and imaged using a Zeiss Axio Imager Z1 brightfield microscope. For TEM, eyes were fixed in PBS-buffered glutaraldehyde (2.5% at pH 7.4) and PBS-buffered osmium tetroxide (0.5%) and embedded in epoxy resin. Thin 90 nm sections were collected on 200-mesh copper grids, dried for 24 h, and double stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Sections were viewed and photographed using a JEOL JM-1010 electron microscope.
For TEM immunolabeling, eyes were enucleated, incised at the limbus and fixed by immersion in cold 2% paraformaldehyde in 1X PBS for 1 hour. Anterior segment and lens were dissected. Eye cups were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (30% - 85% ethanol) on ice. Eye cups were transferred to LR White Resin (medium grade) (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield PA) for 1 hr then transferred to fresh LR White resin and infiltrated for 18 hours at 4 C. Eye cups were transferred to embedding molds containing fresh LR White and air was evacuated from molds to facilitate polymerization. The resin was polymerized for 24 hours at 60 C. A Leica UC6 ultramicrotome and diamond knife were used to cut thin sections which were collected on nickel grids. Sections were blocked in 5% normal goat serum diluted in EM ICC buffer (20mM Tris, 135 mM NaCl, 0.1% BSA, 0.05% Tween-20 pH 7.3) and immunolabeled with rabbit anti-P62 antibody (Abcam Cat #109012) at 8.6ug/ml diluted in EM ICC buffer for 2 hr at room temperature. Primary antibody was omitted from negative control samples. Grids were washed repeatedly and incubated in goat anti-rabbit 20nm gold (Abcam Cat # 27237) diluted 1:20 in EM ICC buffer for 1 hr, washed repeated and fixed for 5 min in 2% glutaraldehyde, washed in distilled water and allowed to dry. Grids were stained with 1% uranyl acetate for 18 minutes and Reynold’s lead citrate for 5 minutes. Grids were imaged on either a JEOL 1010 or JEOL 1200 EX II.
Immunoblot and immunoprecipitation
Immunoblotting was performed as described [55] using antibodies listed in S3 Table. Images are representative of at least three biological replicates. Densitometric analysis was performed using either ImageJ or Image Lab (BioRad) by normalizing proteins to β-actin, γ-tubulin, or total protein. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired t-test within the Prism Program.
The Dynabeads (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) protocol was used for immunoprecipitation studies. Briefly, 5μg Rabex5/RabGEF1 antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was covalently conjugated to 1 mg of Dynabeads and incubated overnight with retina extracts at 4°C. After removing the supernatant, beads were washed with cold immunoprecipitation buffer (150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 40 mM Tris-HCL pH 7.4, 1% NP-40, 10% Glycerol with 1X Complete Protease Inhibitors (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) three times for 10 min each time. Beads were then washed with Dynabeads reagent, LWB, 3X for 10 mins minimum each time. Bound proteins were eluted in 20–40 μl of EB (elution buffer) from the Dynabeads kit and subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.
Immunofluorescence analysis
Whole eyes were either frozen immediately in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) solution (Tissue Tek, Sakura, USA) (for fresh-frozen sections) or fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 30–60 min, followed by overnight cryoprotection in 30% sucrose in 1X PBS, and then embedded in OCT. The anterior segment was dissected from fixed eyes prior to embedding. Fresh frozen cryosections were post-fixed for 2–5 min with 4% PFA, and all cryosections were permeabilized and blocked with 5% Donkey Serum in 1X PBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 for at least 30 min at room temperature before incubation with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Primary antibody concentrations and reaction conditions can be found in S3 Table. After antibody incubations, slides were washed for 30–60 min at room temperature with 1X PBS, mounted using Southern Biotech Fluoromount media (Birmingham, AL, USA), and viewed on a confocal laser scanning microscope unless otherwise indicated (Zeiss, Model 700 or 880 with Airyscan, Jena, Germany).
EEA1 (early endosomal antigen 1) quantitation in photoreceptors
Confocal images of EEA1-stained retina sections were collected in 4 slice Z-stacks with an interval of 0.5 μm, thus sampling from 2μM thickness of tissue. Image stacks were converted to grayscale and cropped to the photoreceptor inner/outer segment area where the bulk of the photoreceptor cellular machinery is located. EEA1-positive puncta were counted from individual slices using ImageJ.
In Situ hybridization
In situ hybridization was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions [Advanced Cell Diagnostic Biosystems (ACD), fluorescence protocol; Newark, CA, USA]. Specific probes were designed by ACD against the 3’ and 5’ untranslated regions of Rabgef1 transcript.
Preparation of vesicle fractions from mouse retina
Vesicle fractions enriched for autophagosomes were isolated from retinas of Rabgef1-KO and control mice using density gradient centrifugation, as described [56] with modifications suggested by Dr. S. Azadi. Briefly, 20 retinas of P14-P19 mice were homogenized in 500 μl of cold HEPES buffer (50mM each of HEPES, TES, Tricine, 100 mM NaCl, 10mM KCl, 1mM each of KH2PO4 and Na2SO4, 5mM MgCl2, 1mM CaCl2) pH 7.6 using a motorized pestle. After adding additional 500 μl of cold HEPES buffer, the suspension was passed 10 times through a 20G needle and incubated at 37°C for 3 h with 50 μM Vinblastine. This step blocks the translocation of autophagosomes to lysosomes. The sample was cooled and diluted three times with a hypotonic buffer (10mM HEPES, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) to lyse the cells and centrifuged for 5 min at 1400xg to remove nuclei and cell debris. The supernatant was treated with 0.5 mM of GPN (Glycyl-L-Phenylalanyl 2-naphthylamine) at 37°C for 10 min to disrupt and break the lysosomes. The sample was then centrifuged at 4000xg for 2 min to remove the remaining nuclear debris. The supernatant was loaded on top of a discontinuous Nycodenz gradient (2.9 ml of 22.5% at the bottom/ 6.7 ml of 9.5% in the middle/ 3.1 ml of the supernatant sample on the top) and centrifuged for 1 h at 28,000xg at 4 degrees. Two bands were collected, one at the interface between the sample and 9.5% Nycodez, and the other at the 9.5% and 22.5% interphase. The fractions containing partially purified autophagosomes were analyzed by immunoblotting and subjected to mass spectrometry.
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis
For proteome analysis, immunoprecipitated proteins were reduced, alkylated and trypsin digested as previously described [57]. Desalted tryptic peptides were analyzed on an Orbitrap Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer coupled with a UltiMate 3000-nLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Raw data files were processed with Proteome Discoverer (v2.2, Thermo Fisher Scientific) software, using Mascot v2.5.1 (Matrix Sciences) search node for peptide/protein identification. Target Decoy was used to calculate the false discovery rate (FDR) of peptide spectrum matches, set to a p-value <0.05 [58]. Geneset enrichment analysis with fold change ratio of peptide spectral match counts between KO and WT retina was performed as described in the RNA seq analyses section below.
RNA-seq analyses
Total retinal RNA was used for preparing libraries for RNA-seq, and the data was analyzed using Mus musculus annotations v84 from Ensembl as described [30,59]. Gene abundance were processed with edgeR and limma in R for normalization and differential expression tests between age-matched WT and Rabgef1-KO samples. A standard p-value cut off of 0.1 was used to qualify differentially expressed genes. Genelist enrichment was done with the gProfileR (v0.6.7) [60] package, whereas gene set enrichment analysis was performed using fgsea (v1.8.0) [61]. Reference pathway annotations for geneset enrichment analysis were obtained from ConsensusPathDB [62], GSKB (http://ge-lab.org/gskb/) and manually curated genelists for selected pathways, as described [30]. Additionally, R packages (tidyverse, pheatmap, eulerr and ggrepel) were used for analysis and visualization with custom scripts.
Supporting information
S2 Fig [tif]
Immunohistochemistry of control (Ctrl) and (KO) littermate retinas at P10, P12 and P21 using cell type-specific antibody markers.
S3 Fig [tif]
Raw electroretinogram (ERG) traces from Rabgef1-KO and control animals.
S4 Fig [tif]
Additional replicate transmission electron micrographs of photoreceptors from P10 to P22 showing accumulation of amorphous proteolytic aggregates as development proceeds.
S5 Fig [a]
Characterization of the Rabgef1 retina.
S6 Fig [a]
Altered vesicular cargo composition in enriched fractions of retina.
S7 Fig [tif]
Dysregulation of oxidative stress response genes in the retina.
S8 Fig [tif]
Transcriptional status of autophagy associated genes at different timepoints preceding related degeneration.
S1 Table [fspr]
RNA-expression of Rab family genes in mammalian retina (E11-P28) and isolated flow-sorted photoreceptors (P2-P8).
S2 Table [psm]
Mass spectrometry based proteomic characterization of endosomal vesicular fractions from control and retina (n = 20 pooled P14-P19 retinas per genotype).
S3 Table [xlsx]
Resource table listing all antibodies used within the study.
Zdroje
1. Wright AF, Chakarova CF, Abd El-Aziz MM, Bhattacharya SS. Photoreceptor degeneration: genetic and mechanistic dissection of a complex trait. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(4):273–84. Epub 2010/03/10. doi: 10.1038/nrg2717 20212494.
2. Broadgate S, Yu J, Downes SM, Halford S. Unravelling the genetics of inherited retinal dystrophies: Past, present and future. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017;59:53–96. Epub 2017/04/02. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.03.003 28363849.
3. Verbakel SK, van Huet RAC, Boon CJF, den Hollander AI, Collin RWJ, Klaver CCW, et al. Non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018;66:157–86. Epub 2018/03/30. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.03.005 29597005.
4. Lamb TD, Collin SP, Pugh EN Jr. Evolution of the vertebrate eye: opsins, photoreceptors, retina and eye cup. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(12):960–76. Epub 2007/11/21. doi: 10.1038/nrn2283 18026166; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3143066.
5. May-Simera H, Nagel-Wolfrum K, Wolfrum U. Cilia—The sensory antennae in the eye. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017;60:144–80. Epub 2017/05/16. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.05.001 28504201.
6. Swaroop A, Kim D, Forrest D. Transcriptional regulation of photoreceptor development and homeostasis in the mammalian retina. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11(8):563–76. Epub 2010/07/22. doi: 10.1038/nrn2880 20648062.
7. Brzezinski JA, Reh TA. Photoreceptor cell fate specification in vertebrates. Development. 2015;142(19):3263–73. Epub 2015/10/08. doi: 10.1242/dev.127043 26443631; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4631758.
8. Pearring JN, Salinas RY, Baker SA, Arshavsky VY. Protein sorting, targeting and trafficking in photoreceptor cells. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013;36:24–51. Epub 2013/04/09. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.03.002 23562855; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3759535.
9. Estrada-Cuzcano A, Roepman R, Cremers FP, den Hollander AI, Mans DA. Non-syndromic retinal ciliopathies: translating gene discovery into therapy. Human molecular genetics. 2012;21(R1):R111–24. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds298 22843501.
10. Rachel RA, Li T, Swaroop A. Photoreceptor sensory cilia and ciliopathies: focus on CEP290, RPGR and their interacting proteins. Cilia. 2012;1(1):22. Epub 2013/01/29. doi: 10.1186/2046-2530-1-22 23351659; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3563624.
11. Bujakowska KM, Liu Q, Pierce EA. Photoreceptor Cilia and Retinal Ciliopathies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9(10). Epub 2017/03/16. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028274 28289063.
12. Bachmann-Gagescu R, Neuhauss SC. The photoreceptor cilium and its diseases. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2019;56:22–33. Epub 2019/07/02. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2019.05.004 31260874.
13. Schmid SL, Sorkin A, Zerial M. Endocytosis: Past, present, and future. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(12):a022509. Epub 2014/11/02. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a022509 25359499; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4292149.
14. Jovic M, Sharma M, Rahajeng J, Caplan S. The early endosome: a busy sorting station for proteins at the crossroads. Histol Histopathol. 2010;25(1):99–112. Epub 2009/11/20. doi: 10.14670/HH-25.99 19924646; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2810677.
15. Grant BD, Donaldson JG. Pathways and mechanisms of endocytic recycling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(9):597–608. Epub 2009/08/22. doi: 10.1038/nrm2755 19696797; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3038567.
16. Tooze SA, Abada A, Elazar Z. Endocytosis and autophagy: exploitation or cooperation? Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(5):a018358. Epub 2014/05/03. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018358 24789822; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3996471.
17. Wandinger-Ness A, Zerial M. Rab proteins and the compartmentalization of the endosomal system. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(11):a022616. Epub 2014/10/25. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a022616 25341920; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4413231.
18. Muller MP, Goody RS. Molecular control of Rab activity by GEFs, GAPs and GDI. Small GTPases. 2018;9(1–2):5–21. Epub 2017/01/06. doi: 10.1080/21541248.2016.1276999 28055292; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5902221.
19. Stenmark H. Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(8):513–25. Epub 2009/07/16. doi: 10.1038/nrm2728 19603039.
20. Galvez T, Gilleron J, Zerial M, O'Sullivan GA. SnapShot: Mammalian Rab proteins in endocytic trafficking. Cell. 2012;151(1):234–e2. Epub 2012/10/02. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.013 23021225.
21. Seixas E, Barros M, Seabra MC, Barral DC. Rab and Arf proteins in genetic diseases. Traffic. 2013;14(8):871–85. Epub 2013/04/10. doi: 10.1111/tra.12072 23565987.
22. D'Adamo P, Masetti M, Bianchi V, More L, Mignogna ML, Giannandrea M, et al. RAB GTPases and RAB-interacting proteins and their role in the control of cognitive functions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;46 Pt 2:302–14. Epub 2014/01/15. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.12.009 24412241.
23. Seabra MC, Ho YK, Anant JS. Deficient geranylgeranylation of Ram/Rab27 in choroideremia. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1995;270(41):24420–7. Epub 1995/10/13. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.41.24420 7592656.
24. Roosing S, Rohrschneider K, Beryozkin A, Sharon D, Weisschuh N, Staller J, et al. Mutations in RAB28, Encoding a Farnesylated Small GTPase, Are Associated with Autosomal-Recessive Cone-Rod Dystrophy. American journal of human genetics. 2013;93(1):110–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.05.005 23746546; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3710761.
25. Lumb JH, Leung KF, Dubois KN, Field MC. Rab28 function in trypanosomes: interactions with retromer and ESCRT pathways. Journal of cell science. 2011;124(Pt 22):3771–83. Epub 2011/11/22. doi: 10.1242/jcs.079178 22100919; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3225266.
26. Hollyfield JG, Rayborn ME. Endocytosis in the inner segment of rod photoreceptors: analysis of Xenopus laevis retinas using horseradish peroxidase. Experimental eye research. 1987;45(5):703–19. Epub 1987/11/01. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(87)80119-7 3428395.
27. Van Hook MJ, Thoreson WB. Rapid synaptic vesicle endocytosis in cone photoreceptors of salamander retina. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2012;32(50):18112–23. Epub 2012/12/15. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1764-12.2012 23238726; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3547361.
28. Pinal N, Pichaud F. Dynamin- and Rab5-dependent endocytosis is required to prevent Drosophila photoreceptor degeneration. Journal of cell science. 2011;124(Pt 9):1564–70. Epub 2011/04/14. doi: 10.1242/jcs.082115 21486953; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3078820.
29. Hoshino A, Ratnapriya R, Brooks MJ, Chaitankar V, Wilken MS, Zhang C, et al. Molecular Anatomy of the Developing Human Retina. Developmental cell. 2017;43:763–79. Epub 2017/12/14. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.10.029 29233477.
30. Brooks MJ, Chen HY, Kelley RA, Mondal AK, Nagashima K, De Val N, et al. Improved Retinal Organoid Differentiation by Modulating Signaling Pathways Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome Analyses with Development In Vivo. Stem cell reports. 2019;13(5):891–905. Epub 2019/10/22. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.09.009 31631019; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6895716.
31. Stenmark H, Vitale G, Ullrich O, Zerial M. Rabaptin-5 is a direct effector of the small GTPase Rab5 in endocytic membrane fusion. Cell. 1995;83(3):423–32. Epub 1995/11/03. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90120-5 8521472.
32. Horiuchi H, Lippe R, McBride HM, Rubino M, Woodman P, Stenmark H, et al. A novel Rab5 GDP/GTP exchange factor complexed to Rabaptin-5 links nucleotide exchange to effector recruitment and function. Cell. 1997;90(6):1149–59. Epub 1997/10/10. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80380-3 9323142.
33. Zhang Z, Zhang T, Wang S, Gong Z, Tang C, Chen J, et al. Molecular mechanism for Rabex-5 GEF activation by Rabaptin-5. eLife. 2014;3. Epub 2014/06/25. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02687 24957337; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4102244.
34. Bucci C, Parton RG, Mather IH, Stunnenberg H, Simons K, Hoflack B, et al. The small GTPase rab5 functions as a regulatory factor in the early endocytic pathway. Cell. 1992;70(5):715–28. Epub 1992/09/04. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90306-w 1516130.
35. Carter-Dawson LD, LaVail MM. Rods and cones in the mouse retina. II. Autoradiographic analysis of cell generation using tritiated thymidine. J Comp Neurol. 1979;188(2):263–72. Epub 1979/11/15. doi: 10.1002/cne.901880205 500859.
36. Kim JW, Yang HJ, Brooks MJ, Zelinger L, Karakulah G, Gotoh N, et al. NRL-Regulated Transcriptome Dynamics of Developing Rod Photoreceptors. Cell reports. 2016;17(9):2460–73. Epub 2016/11/24. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.074 27880916; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5131731.
37. Tam SY, Tsai M, Snouwaert JN, Kalesnikoff J, Scherrer D, Nakae S, et al. RabGEF1 is a negative regulator of mast cell activation and skin inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2004;5(8):844–52. Epub 2004/07/06. doi: 10.1038/ni1093 15235600.
38. Simonsen A, Lippe R, Christoforidis S, Gaullier JM, Brech A, Callaghan J, et al. EEA1 links PI(3)K function to Rab5 regulation of endosome fusion. Nature. 1998;394(6692):494–8. Epub 1998/08/11. doi: 10.1038/28879 9697774.
39. Zhou F, Zou S, Chen Y, Lipatova Z, Sun D, Zhu X, et al. A Rab5 GTPase module is important for autophagosome closure. PLoS genetics. 2017;13(9):e1007020. Epub 2017/09/22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007020 28934205; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5626503.
40. Yamano K, Wang C, Sarraf SA, Munch C, Kikuchi R, Noda NN, et al. Endosomal Rab cycles regulate Parkin-mediated mitophagy. eLife. 2018;7. Epub 2018/01/24. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31326 29360040; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5780041.
41. Zeigerer A, Gilleron J, Bogorad RL, Marsico G, Nonaka H, Seifert S, et al. Rab5 is necessary for the biogenesis of the endolysosomal system in vivo. Nature. 2012;485(7399):465–70. Epub 2012/05/25. doi: 10.1038/nature11133 22622570.
42. Mattera R, Tsai YC, Weissman AM, Bonifacino JS. The Rab5 guanine nucleotide exchange factor Rabex-5 binds ubiquitin (Ub) and functions as a Ub ligase through an atypical Ub-interacting motif and a zinc finger domain. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2006;281(10):6874–83. Epub 2006/01/13. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509939200 16407276.
43. Mattera R, Bonifacino JS. Ubiquitin binding and conjugation regulate the recruitment of Rabex-5 to early endosomes. The EMBO journal. 2008;27(19):2484–94. Epub 2008/09/06. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.177 18772883; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2567407.
44. Carney DS, Davies BA, Horazdovsky BF. Vps9 domain-containing proteins: activators of Rab5 GTPases from yeast to neurons. Trends Cell Biol. 2006;16(1):27–35. Epub 2005/12/07. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.11.001 16330212.
45. Marichal T, Gaudenzio N, El Abbas S, Sibilano R, Zurek O, Starkl P, et al. Guanine nucleotide exchange factor RABGEF1 regulates keratinocyte-intrinsic signaling to maintain skin homeostasis. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2016;126(12):4497–515. Epub 2016/11/08. doi: 10.1172/JCI86359 27820702; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5127679.
46. Sudhof TC. The synaptic vesicle cycle. Annual review of neuroscience. 2004;27:509–47. Epub 2004/06/26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131412 15217342.
47. Mahapatra KK, Panigrahi DP, Praharaj PP, Bhol CS, Patra S, Mishra SR, et al. Molecular interplay of autophagy and endocytosis in human health and diseases. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 2019;94(4):1576–90. Epub 2019/04/17. doi: 10.1111/brv.12515 30989802.
48. Birgisdottir AB, Johansen T. Autophagy and endocytosis—interconnections and interdependencies. Journal of cell science. 2020;133(10). Epub 2020/06/06. doi: 10.1242/jcs.228114 32501285.
49. Ravikumar B, Imarisio S, Sarkar S, O'Kane CJ, Rubinsztein DC. Rab5 modulates aggregation and toxicity of mutant huntingtin through macroautophagy in cell and fly models of Huntington disease. Journal of cell science. 2008;121(Pt 10):1649–60. Epub 2008/04/24. doi: 10.1242/jcs.025726 18430781; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2635563.
50. Heckmann BL, Teubner BJW, Tummers B, Boada-Romero E, Harris L, Yang M, et al. LC3-Associated Endocytosis Facilitates beta-Amyloid Clearance and Mitigates Neurodegeneration in Murine Alzheimer's Disease. Cell. 2019;178(3):536–51 e14. Epub 2019/07/02. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.056 31257024; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6689199.
51. Dwivedi M, Sung H, Shen H, Park BJ, Lee S. Disruption of endocytic pathway regulatory genes activates autophagy in C. elegans. Mol Cells. 2011;31(5):477–81. Epub 2011/05/28. doi: 10.1007/s10059-011-1035-1 21618079; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3887608.
52. Szatmari Z, Sass M. The autophagic roles of Rab small GTPases and their upstream regulators: a review. Autophagy. 2014;10(7):1154–66. Epub 2014/06/11. doi: 10.4161/auto.29395 24915298; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4203544.
53. Klionsky DJ, Abdalla FC, Abeliovich H, Abraham RT, Acevedo-Arozena A, Adeli K, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy. 2012;8(4):445–544. Epub 2012/09/12. doi: 10.4161/auto.19496 22966490; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3404883.
54. von Eisenhart-Rothe P, Grubman A, Greferath U, Fothergill LJ, Jobling AI, Phipps JA, et al. Failure of Autophagy-Lysosomal Pathways in Rod Photoreceptors Causes the Early Retinal Degeneration Phenotype Observed in Cln6nclf Mice. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2018;59(12):5082–97. Epub 2018/10/30. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24757 30372735.
55. Campla CK, Mast H, Dong L, Lei J, Halford S, Sekaran S, et al. Targeted deletion of an NRL- and CRX-regulated alternative promoter specifically silences FERM and PDZ domain containing 1 (Frmpd1) in rod photoreceptors. Human molecular genetics. 2019;28(5):804–17. Epub 2018/11/18. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy388 30445545; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6381315.
56. Stromhaug PE, Berg TO, Fengsrud M, Seglen PO. Purification and characterization of autophagosomes from rat hepatocytes. The Biochemical journal. 1998;335 (Pt 2):217–24. Epub 1998/10/08. doi: 10.1042/bj3350217 9761717; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1219772.
57. Stoehr A, Yang Y, Patel S, Evangelista AM, Aponte A, Wang G, et al. Prolyl hydroxylation regulates protein degradation, synthesis, and splicing in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Res. 2016;110(3):346–58. Epub 2016/04/21. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvw081 27095734; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4872881.
58. Elias JE, Gygi SP. Target-decoy search strategy for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;604:55–71. Epub 2009/12/17. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-444-9_5 20013364; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2922680.
59. Roger JE, Hiriyanna A, Gotoh N, Hao H, Cheng DF, Ratnapriya R, et al. OTX2 loss causes rod differentiation defect in CRX-associated congenital blindness. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2014;124(2):631–43. Epub 2014/01/03. doi: 10.1172/JCI72722 24382353; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3904630.
60. Raudvere U, Kolberg L, Kuzmin I, Arak T, Adler P, Peterson H, et al. g:Profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W191–W8. Epub 2019/05/09. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz369 31066453; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6602461.
61. Sergushichev AA, Loboda AA, Jha AK, Vincent EE, Driggers EM, Jones RG, et al. GAM: a web-service for integrated transcriptional and metabolic network analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W194–200. Epub 2016/04/22. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw266 27098040; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4987878.
62. Herwig R, Hardt C, Lienhard M, Kamburov A. Analyzing and interpreting genome data at the network level with ConsensusPathDB. Nat Protoc. 2016;11(10):1889–907. Epub 2016/09/09. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.117 27606777.
63. Akimoto M, Cheng H, Zhu D, Brzezinski JA, Khanna R, Filippova E, et al. Targeting of GFP to newborn rods by Nrl promoter and temporal expression profiling of flow-sorted photoreceptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103(10):3890–5. Epub 2006/03/01. 0508214103 [pii] doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508214103 16505381.
64. Calvo SE, Clauser KR, Mootha VK. MitoCarta2.0: an updated inventory of mammalian mitochondrial proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D1251–7. Epub 2015/10/10. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1003 26450961; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4702768.
65. Walker SA, Ktistakis NT. Autophagosome Biogenesis Machinery. Journal of molecular biology. 2020;432(8):2449–61. Epub 2019/11/11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.10.027 31705882.
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2020 Číslo 12
- Antibiotika na nachlazení nezabírají! Jak můžeme zpomalit šíření rezistence?
- FDA varuje před selfmonitoringem cukru pomocí chytrých hodinek. Jak je to v Česku?
- Prof. Jan Škrha: Metformin je bezpečný, ale je třeba jej bezpečně užívat a léčbu kontrolovat
- Ibuprofen jako alternativa antibiotik při léčbě infekcí močových cest
- Jak a kdy u celiakie začíná reakce na lepek? Možnou odpověď poodkryla čerstvá kanadská studie
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Exploiting codon usage identifies intensity-specific modifiers of Ras/MAPK signaling in vivo
- Common maternal and fetal genetic variants show expected polygenic effects on risk of small- or large-for-gestational-age (SGA or LGA), except in the smallest 3% of babies
- PEA15 loss of function and defective cerebral development in the domestic cat
- Precision medicine in cats—The right biomedical model may not be the mouse!